Re: [lkcd-devel] Re: [kbuild-devel] sorting out the kerntypes mess

2005-02-10 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 11:16:35PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On S?nndag 30 Januar 2005 18:37, Christoph Hellwig wrote: So you expect kerntypes-y := file.o to be present in one or a few places outside arch/ And then in one or a few files within arch/ the arch specific types

Re: [kbuild-devel] sorting out the kerntypes mess

2005-01-30 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 06:34:48PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: First trying to understand exactly what you want. So you expect kerntypes-y := file.o to be present in one or a few places outside arch/ And then in one or a few files within arch/ the arch specific types are brought in with

Re: [kbuild-devel] [PATCH 2.4.25] enable cross-compilation from Mac OS X

2004-02-24 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 02:23:23PM +, Martin Schaffner wrote: -ARCH := $(shell uname -m | sed -e s/i.86/i386/ -e s/sun4u/sparc64/ -e s/arm.*/arm/ -e s/sa110/arm/) +ARCH := $(shell uname -m | sed -e s/i.86/i386/ -e s/sun4u/sparc64/ -e s/arm.*/arm/ -e s/sa110/arm/ -e s/Power\

Re: [kbuild-devel] Needed help for UML kbuild.

2003-12-25 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Dec 24, 2003 at 08:19:23PM +0100, BlaisorBlade wrote: Makefile.build change is just cosmetic(changing the shown tag; I must change it more to fix the filename alignment; but why don't you use a tab for this?). The Makefile.lib, instead, is the core change: objects listed in

Re: [kbuild-devel] Problems with make menuconfig of linux2.6.0-test5

2003-09-15 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 08:56:36PM +0200, Martin Schaffner wrote: Hi, When doing make menuconfig of linux2.6.0-test5, I noted some issues: 1) The configuration item PowerMac DMA sound support under Sound card support in the Sound Menu should be in the Open Sound System Menu, because the

[kbuild-devel] Re: 2.5 kbuild: use of '-z muldefs' for LD?

2003-06-09 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 01:56:59PM +0200, Jaroslav Kysela wrote: one object file for more targets. Example: -- snd-ice1712-objs := ice1712.o delta.o hoontech.o ews.o ak4xxx.o snd-ice1724-objs := ice1724.o amp.o revo.o aureon.o ak4xxx.o # Toplevel Module Dependency

[kbuild-devel] Re: 2.5 kbuild: use of '-z muldefs' for LD?

2003-06-09 Thread Christoph Hellwig
*grr* Can you _please_ stop the stupid practice of Cc'ing members-only lists? Thanks. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features you've

[kbuild-devel] Re: 2.5 kbuild: use of '-z muldefs' for LD?

2003-06-09 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 04:01:41PM +0200, Jaroslav Kysela wrote: But this solution will create a new kernel module. The shared code is really small and having small codes in separated modules is waste of memory in my eyes. Well, if you want separate copies of it you have to make sure the

Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: linux kernel conf 0.8

2002-10-09 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 06:29:03PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: Hi, On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Randy.Dunlap wrote: So I think that you and Roman are close to agreement, when Roman has the library backend ready. Of course someone needs to do a reference implementation with it also, but it

Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: [patch] config language dep_* enhancements

2002-08-20 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 11:48:00PM +0200, Kai Henningsen wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg Banks) wrote on 19.08.02 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]: In http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernelm=101387128818052w=2 David Woodhouse gives an idea of what would be necessary to get a new

Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: State of the new config build system

2001-12-30 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 03:39:02PM -0500, Eric S. Raymond wrote: It may be that the reason our experiences have been different is because we focus on different target languages. But I think my experience is an existence proof that there *is* demand for localization and that meeting it can

Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up

2001-05-18 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 12:04:34PM -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote: Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I don't want to do (a); it conflicts with my design objective of simplifying configuration enough that Aunt Tillie can do it. I won't do that unless I see a strong consensus that it's the only

Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up

2001-05-18 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 01:22:35PM -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote: Michael Meissner [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 06:09:09PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: Aunt Tillie shouldn't try to manually configure a kernel. Ummm, maybe Aunt Tillie wants to learn how to configure

Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up

2001-05-18 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 11:51:28AM -0400, John Cowan wrote: Jes Sorensen wrote: Telling them to install an updated gcc for kernel compilation is a necessary evil, which can easily be done without disturbing the rest of the system. Updating the system's python installation is not a

Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up

2001-05-18 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 12:34:13PM -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote: Alan, it sounds very much like you just said something stupid. This seems sufficiently unlikely that I am shaking my head in disbelief and fingernailing wax out of both ears (and if you think doing both those things at once is