Re: [kbuild-devel] Needed help for UML kbuild.

2004-01-08 Thread Jeff Dike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > some modules(i.e. hostaudio) are built from a "userspace" (needing the > special treatment) file and a "kernel" (to be compiled as usual) > file. How will kbuild link them together? > I have three workarounds: > - split the module into 2 separate ones, with the kernel o

Re: [kbuild-devel] Needed help for UML kbuild.

2004-01-08 Thread BlaisorBlade
Alle 21:21, martedì 6 gennaio 2004, hai scritto: > > I'm posting this as reminder... however the UML naintainer said that the > > special treatment (which remains the same) must happens for a different > > file set, i.e. all the files below one folder. > > Thanks - and it was needed. > I have shift

Re: [kbuild-devel] Needed help for UML kbuild.

2003-12-28 Thread BlaisorBlade
Alle 11:45, giovedì 25 dicembre 2003, Christoph Hellwig ha scritto: > Please don't use shouting names.. Ok. Then user-objs; or if this could be used somewhere else, uml-user-objs. > > The list always contains, in the arch/um subfolders, all objects whose > > name matches %_user.o(as it has alway

Re: [kbuild-devel] Needed help for UML kbuild.

2003-12-25 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Dec 24, 2003 at 08:19:23PM +0100, BlaisorBlade wrote: > Makefile.build change is just cosmetic(changing the shown tag; I must change > it more to fix the filename alignment; but why don't you use a tab for > this?). The Makefile.lib, instead, is the core change: objects listed in > UML_U

[kbuild-devel] Needed help for UML kbuild.

2003-12-24 Thread BlaisorBlade
I'm a UML(User mode linux, the arch/um folder in 2.5/2.6) developer, and I need some support to update its build system to the 2.6 changes. The problem is that since that port of Linux runs as a normal process and emulates a whole box, some of its source files must be compiled against user-spac