[kbuild-devel] kbuild-devel is dead? [Was: Suggestion for addition to the root Makefile]

2003-03-01 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 02:59:06PM -0600, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: BTW I think this list is nearly dead. Agree. One reason for this is that a couple of times when new stuff has been ready for inclusion, Linus complained that it was developed in a 'closed forum' - and he wants public

[kbuild-devel] Suggestion for addition to the root Makefile

2003-03-01 Thread Peter Enderborg
WIth this little patch is easy to switch gcc version. The the users can add its own preferences. On my system I have 3 versions of gcc. And guess Im not alone. diff Makefile Makefile.org 49,50c49,50 HOSTCC:= $(firstword $(CC) gcc) HOSTCXX := $(firstword $(CXX) g++) --- HOSTCC

[kbuild-devel] Re: kbuild-devel is dead? [Was: Suggestion for addition to the root Makefile]

2003-03-01 Thread Michael Elizabeth Chastain
Agree. One reason for this is that a couple of times when new stuff has been ready for inclusion, Linus complained that it was developed in a 'closed forum' - and he wants public review on lkml for non-trivial stuff. If Linus said that kbuild-devel is (was) a 'closed forum', then Linus was