[kbuild-devel] Re: architectures with their own config PCMCIA

2004-08-16 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 09:37:30PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, Roman Zippel wrote: On Sat, 14 Aug 2004, Adrian Bunk wrote: This is less a problem, as here it's clear that you want a boolean result, but something like FOO=n is really a string compare and FOO

[kbuild-devel] Re: architectures with their own config PCMCIA

2004-08-16 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 01:01:35AM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: Hi, Hi Roman, On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: What about normal numbers? I don't think requiring quotes everywhere for this is a good idea. And numbers (both decimal and hex) can easily be distinguished

[kbuild-devel] Re: architectures with their own config PCMCIA

2004-08-12 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 10:17:25PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 08:12:56PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: ... On Samstag, 7. August 2004 19:25, Adrian Bunk wrote: Is there eny reason for such options that are never visible nor enabled, or could they be removed?

[kbuild-devel] Re: architectures with their own config PCMCIA

2004-08-12 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 11:40:32PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: Roman, a related Q. Why not error out, or at least warn when encountering an unknow symbol in a 'depends on' statement? ... That doesn't sound like a good idea, consider e.g.: config BAGETLANCE tristate Baget AMD LANCE

[kbuild-devel] Re: architectures with their own config PCMCIA

2004-08-12 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 02:18:48 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote: | On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 11:45:21PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: | | Hi, | | Hi Roman, | | On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Adrian Bunk wrote: | | Roman, is it intentional that PCMCIA!=n is true if there's no PCMCIA | option, or is it simply a