---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106101/#review23685
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106101/#review18495
---
Ship it!
Ah, thanks for the extra info. Makes sense.
-
On Tuesday 04 September 2012, Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
On Aug. 20, 2012, 4:37 p.m., Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
Doesn't the same change also apply to the other find_package() calls
there?
Allen Winter wrote:
Yes, I'm also curious about why these 2 are so much more irritating
On Aug. 20, 2012, 4:37 p.m., Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
Doesn't the same change also apply to the other find_package() calls there?
Allen Winter wrote:
Yes, I'm also curious about why these 2 are so much more irritating than
any other find_packages()
Aleix, can you
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106101/
---
Review request for Build System and KDEPIM.
Description
---
in case
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106101/#review17759
---
Doesn't the same change also apply to the other find_package()
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106101/#review17773
---
I don't really care, but I wouldn't add the quiet.
The output
On Aug. 20, 2012, 4:37 p.m., Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
Doesn't the same change also apply to the other find_package() calls there?
Yes, I'm also curious about why these 2 are so much more irritating than any
other find_packages()
Aleix, can you paste the annoying parts? Maybe we can
