Serializing possibly resource-intensive tasks such as meinproc

2010-01-07 Thread Lubos Lunak
Hello, I would like to commit the attached kdelibs/icecream patches, in order to avoid running into pathetic OOM situations on Linux. In short, run (or rather don't) 'make -j30' e.g. in kdebase/runtime/doc. As we have a nice icecream build farm here, I normally do such parallel builds,

Re: Serializing possibly resource-intensive tasks such as meinproc

2010-01-07 Thread Allan Sandfeld Jensen
Hi Lubak This is an excelent idea (I've tried convincing Dirk to do something similar for years). But why are you detecting icecream and adding in cmake? Wouldn't it be better to simple add a meinproc link during icecream installation like it is done for cc and c++? Regards `Allan

KDE/kdelibs/cmake/modules

2010-01-07 Thread Alexander Neundorf
SVN commit 1071192 by neundorf: we require CMake 2.6.2 or KDE, nothing else has been announced, discussed or even suggested Alex CCMAIL: kde-buildsystem@kde.org CCMAIL: muel...@kde.org M +1 -1 FindKDE4Internal.cmake --- trunk/KDE/kdelibs/cmake/modules/FindKDE4Internal.cmake

Re: KDE/kdelibs/cmake/modules

2010-01-07 Thread Mike Arthur
On 7 Jan 2010, at 17:53, Alexander Neundorf wrote: we require CMake 2.6.2 or KDE, nothing else has been announced, discussed or even suggested I suggest 2.8! ;) -- Cheers, Mike Arthur http://mikearthur.co.uk ___ Kde-buildsystem mailing list

Re: KDE/kdelibs/cmake/modules

2010-01-07 Thread Raphael Kubo da Costa
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.org wrote: SVN commit 1071192 by neundorf: we require CMake 2.6.2 or KDE, nothing else has been announced, discussed or even suggested Alex CCMAIL: kde-buildsystem@kde.org CCMAIL: muel...@kde.org  M  +1 -1      

Re: KDE/kdelibs/cmake/modules

2010-01-07 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Thursday 07 January 2010, Dirk Mueller wrote: SVN commit 1071123 by mueller: we need 2.6.3 for the shared-desktop-ontologies detection What ?? You cannot simply do that without discussing or announcing this anywhere. I'll revert. SDI is just a simple file, this surely can't be the reason

Re: KDE/kdelibs/cmake/modules

2010-01-07 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Thursday 07 January 2010, Mike Arthur wrote: On 7 Jan 2010, at 17:53, Alexander Neundorf wrote: we require CMake 2.6.2 or KDE, nothing else has been announced, discussed or even suggested I suggest 2.8! ;) Maybe, but only if necessary and people should have time to update beforee it

Re: KDE/kdelibs/cmake/modules

2010-01-07 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Thursday 07 January 2010, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.org wrote: SVN commit 1071192 by neundorf: we require CMake 2.6.2 or KDE, nothing else has been announced, discussed or even suggested Alex CCMAIL:

policy proposal : runtime only checks be non-fatal

2010-01-07 Thread Rex Dieter
There are an increasing number of cmake checks in core kde modules (as well as others), for items needed only at runtime (not buildtime). That is all well and good, but these often are not optional checks, which as a packager, I very much object to. Is there any sort of best-practice or policy

Re: policy proposal : runtime only checks be non-fatal

2010-01-07 Thread Allen Winter
On Thursday 07 January 2010 1:33:40 pm Rex Dieter wrote: There are an increasing number of cmake checks in core kde modules (as well as others), for items needed only at runtime (not buildtime). That is all well and good, but these often are not optional checks, which as a packager, I very

Re: policy proposal : runtime only checks be non-fatal

2010-01-07 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Thursday 07 January 2010, Rex Dieter wrote: There are an increasing number of cmake checks in core kde modules (as well as others), for items needed only at runtime (not buildtime). That is all well and good, but these often are not optional checks, which as a packager, I very much object

Re: Serializing possibly resource-intensive tasks such as meinproc

2010-01-07 Thread Lubos Lunak
On Thursday 07 of January 2010, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: Hi Lubak This is an excelent idea (I've tried convincing Dirk to do something similar for years). But why are you detecting icecream and adding in cmake? Wouldn't it be better to simple add a meinproc link during icecream

Re: Serializing possibly resource-intensive tasks such as meinproc

2010-01-07 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 04:20:39PM +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote: I would like to commit the attached kdelibs/icecream patches, in order to avoid running into pathetic OOM situations on Linux. i'll comment on the icecream patch when i find the time. ping me on irc if i don't. but i find the kde

Re: KDE/kdelibs/cmake/modules

2010-01-07 Thread Dirk Mueller
On Thursday 07 January 2010, Alexander Neundorf wrote: we need 2.6.3 for the shared-desktop-ontologies detection What ?? Sorry, I assumed this is not a big issue, given that we depend on kdebindings in kdebase/workspace which only builds against a recent SVN snapshot of the python sip