Re: [kde-community] Why were there no talks about Ubuntu Mobile at Akademy?

2013-08-16 Thread Jos Poortvliet
On Friday 16 August 2013 18:51:37 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Friday, August 16, 2013 10:49:26 Jos Poortvliet wrote: > > - Our marketing efforts of "KDE is people" has backfired, Canonical now > > thinks KDE = Aaron and Aaron = KDE ;-) > > That’s an incorrect conclusion, I fear. Canonical’s viewpoi

Re: [kde-community] Why were there no talks about Ubuntu Mobile at Akademy?

2013-08-16 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Friday, August 16, 2013 10:49:26 Jos Poortvliet wrote: > - Our marketing efforts of "KDE is people" has backfired, Canonical now > thinks KDE = Aaron and Aaron = KDE ;-) That’s an incorrect conclusion, I fear. Canonical’s viewpoint that I somehow steer all of KDE as some sort of benevolent dic

Re: [kde-community] Why were there no talks about Ubuntu Mobile at Akademy?

2013-08-16 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Friday, August 16, 2013 07:42:54 Carl Symons wrote: > The weird part of this discussion for me is how Canonical became the > victim, how Jos's comment were intended to "bash Canonical at every > turn". Having watched many Canonical employees interact with people over the last several months on

Re: [kde-community] Why were there no talks about Ubuntu Mobile at Akademy?

2013-08-16 Thread Carl Symons
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Michael Zanetti wrote: > On Friday 16 August 2013 10:12:29 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: >> On Friday, August 16, 2013 01:49:56 you wrote: >> > Anyways, the question is why Canonical didn't have any talks about Ubuntu >> > Touch. I personally found it a bit weird and would

Re: [kde-community] Why were there no talks about Ubuntu Mobile at Akademy?

2013-08-16 Thread Michael Zanetti
On Friday 16 August 2013 10:12:29 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Friday, August 16, 2013 01:49:56 you wrote: > > Anyways, the question is why Canonical didn't have any talks about Ubuntu > > Touch. I personally found it a bit weird and wouldn't have expected that > > this years akademy was so much abou

Re: [kde-community] Why were there no talks about Ubuntu Mobile at Akademy?

2013-08-16 Thread Jos Poortvliet
On Thursday 15 August 2013 13:37:56 Jos Poortvliet wrote: > Heya, > > See the subject - I don't understand why, if Ubuntu wants people to > develop apps for their Qt/QML based Phone OS (and perhaps, later, > desktop), they were not at Akademy? Not as sponsors, not with a booth, > not with talks an

Re: [kde-community] contacts

2013-08-16 Thread Michael Pyne
On Thu, August 15, 2013 13:50:24 Jos Poortvliet wrote: > Friedrich noted on another list that http://kde.org/contact/ is rather > outdated. It would indeed make sense to start that page noting that: > - public community discussions take place on kde-community@kde.org > - KDE developers can be reach

Re: [kde-community] Why were there no talks about Ubuntu Mobile at Akademy?

2013-08-16 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Friday, August 16, 2013 01:49:56 you wrote: > Anyways, the question is why Canonical didn't have any talks about Ubuntu > Touch. I personally found it a bit weird and wouldn't have expected that > this years akademy was so much about mobile phone platforms *not* related > to KDE. Actually I woul