Re: [kde-community] Qt Community partner

2014-01-17 Thread Claudia Rauch
On 15 January 2014 22:57, Jaroslaw Staniek stan...@kde.org wrote: On 18 September 2013 15:43, Claudia Rauch ra...@kde.org wrote: On 18 September 2013 15:24, Jaroslaw Staniek stan...@kde.org wrote: Hi Claudia, Attached re-worked HTML that's relevant to Calligra. Some of that is a simple

Re: [kde-community] Plasmoids and Apps - was - Re: Applications in KDE Generation 5

2014-01-17 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Thursday, January 16, 2014 22:54:43 Albert Astals Cid wrote: So basically there's no difference between a plasmoid and a non-plasmoid? There are differences; I would never do Krita as a plasmoid, e.g. Or, for that matter, Okular. The Plasmoid design pattern lends itself to self-contained,

Re: [kde-community] KDE Essential Applications - was - Re: Applications in KDE Generation 5

2014-01-17 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Thursday, January 16, 2014 22:24:09 Marco Martin wrote: they are both desiderable, but they seems quite in contrast each other. I'm sure I'm hitting a false dichotomy there, but not seeing a clear solution. does anybody does? there are (at least) two ways to approach the “integrated

Re: [kde-community] Plasmoids and Apps - was - Re: Applications in KDE Generation 5

2014-01-17 Thread Marco Martin
On Friday 17 January 2014, Sebastian Kügler wrote: That's pretty much what plasma-windowed does (modulo some setup of KDeclarative, etc.). Disadvantage of a binary-per-app would be that it requires compiling, with a generic app shell loader thing (like plasma- windowed), you can write whole

Re: [kde-community] Plasmoids and Apps - was - Re: Applications in KDE Generation 5

2014-01-17 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Thursday, January 16, 2014 22:05:08 Albert Astals Cid wrote: * Sorry for being rude ... * Sorry if being being rude and wrong made you feel insulted. It was not my intention at all. thanks for writing this, it is meaningful. i would echo what marco said about sorry for being wrong,

Re: [kde-community] KDE Essential Applications - was - Re: Applications in KDE Generation 5

2014-01-17 Thread Adriaan de Groot
On Thursday 16 January 2014 22:24:09 Marco Martin wrote: they are both desiderable, but they seems quite in contrast each other. I'm sure I'm hitting a false dichotomy there, but not seeing a clear solution. does anybody does? There shouldn't be a dichotomy. It's a matter of defining and then

Re: [kde-community] KDE Essential Applications - was - Re: Applications in KDE Generation 5

2014-01-17 Thread Luigi Toscano
Adriaan de Groot wrote: Note also that we *have* some kinds of metapackages already defined. Thery're on our website, at http://www.kde.org/applications/ . You'll note that the list of applications in graphics doesn't coincide with the repositories, and does include digiKam, because

Re: [kde-community] Proper KDE SDK - was - Re: Applications in KDE Generation 5

2014-01-17 Thread Pau Garcia i Quiles
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Ben Cooksley bcooks...@kde.org wrote: Where can I find the CI scripts? If someone could give me access to Jenkins and give me a little introduction to what's already in place for CI, I can probably help with automating the SDK generation so that it's

Re: [kde-community] Proper KDE SDK - was - Re: Applications in KDE Generation 5

2014-01-17 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Pau Garcia i Quiles pgqui...@elpauer.org wrote: On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Ben Cooksley bcooks...@kde.org wrote: Where can I find the CI scripts? If someone could give me access to Jenkins and give me a little introduction to what's already in