Re: [kde-community] Retiring applications - was - Re: Applications in KDE Generation 5

2014-01-20 Thread Harald Sitter
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:37 AM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote: El Dimecres, 15 de gener de 2014, a les 21:47:17, John Layt va escriure: Hi, * A number of our apps and utilities really have had their day and need retiring, e.g. KsCD, Kppp, KFloppy. There's no point keeping

Re: [kde-community] Plasmoids and Apps - was - Re: Applications in KDE Generation 5

2014-01-20 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Sunday, January 19, 2014 23:42:58 Martin Sandsmark wrote: On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 11:55:13AM +0100, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: this is not really related at all, and i hesitate to engage in the topic here due to loss of topical focus. It was merely to illustrate a point, that switching to

Re: [kde-community] Plasmoids and Apps - was - Re: Applications in KDE Generation 5

2014-01-20 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Monday, January 20, 2014 18:29:16 Martin Sandsmark wrote: On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:10:06AM +0100, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: namely duplication of effort and inconsistency due to multiple implementations of what is from a use case perspective the same thing. This would be all well and good

Re: [kde-community] Plasmoids and Apps - was - Re: Applications in KDE Generation 5

2014-01-20 Thread Martin Sandsmark
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 06:42:14PM +0100, Martin Klapetek wrote: Just for the record, we now have almost 1-to-1 visual consistency of QtQuickControls with Oxygen style and classic QWidgets with Oxygen style. Couple patches are still pending. I think the amount of work that has gone into Oxygen

Re: [kde-community] Plasmoids and Apps - was - Re: Applications in KDE Generation 5

2014-01-20 Thread Martin Sandsmark
I first wrote a long reply talking crap about UX and regressions, but I re-read it and thought about kittens instead, so I deleted it. On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 07:05:24PM +0100, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: Agreed, or at the very least has parity. This is all I really want. Don't remove kcalc until the

Re: [kde-community] QtCurve

2014-01-20 Thread Yichao Yu
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote: Hello, Note there's the incubator now for existing projects willing to join: http://community.kde.org/Incubator I have seen the email of the restarted Incubator project before but I thought it was mainly for start up

Re: [kde-community] QtCurve

2014-01-20 Thread Eike Hein
On Monday 20 January 2014 17:13:47 Yichao Yu wrote: QtCurve (although being not very polished) is already stable and have made several releases that are packaged by a number of distributions. Is there anything I am missing here? I think Kevin just wanted to point out there's an additional wiki