Re: [kde-community] user stats for Neon

2016-04-14 Thread Ingo Klöcker
On Thursday 14 April 2016 16:18:30 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > On Donnerstag, 14. April 2016 15:26:10 CEST Mirko Boehm - KDE wrote: > > > On 14 Apr 2016, at 15:16, Jonathan Riddell > > > wrote: > > > relative metric of numbers of installs not absolute numbers. So > > > I added a

Re: [kde-community] user stats for Neon

2016-04-14 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 14 April 2016 at 19:04, Kevin Krammer wrote: > On Thursday, 2016-04-14, 14:36:21, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 04:18:30PM +0200, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > > > Any potentially privacy-sensitive information transfer should be > opt-in, > > > not opt-out. >

Re: [kde-community] user stats for Neon

2016-04-14 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Thursday, 2016-04-14, 14:36:21, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 04:18:30PM +0200, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > > Any potentially privacy-sensitive information transfer should be opt-in, > > not opt-out. > > I'd assume that the vast majority of users will allow it (given that it's

Re: [kde-community] user stats for Neon

2016-04-14 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 14 April 2016 at 17:30, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > On Donnerstag, 14. April 2016 14:36:21 CEST Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 04:18:30PM +0200, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > > > Any potentially privacy-sensitive information transfer should be > opt-in, >

Re: [kde-community] user stats for Neon

2016-04-14 Thread Thomas Pfeiffer
On Donnerstag, 14. April 2016 14:36:21 CEST Jonathan Riddell wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 04:18:30PM +0200, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > > Any potentially privacy-sensitive information transfer should be opt-in, > > not opt-out. > > I'd assume that the vast majority of users will allow it (given

Re: [kde-community] user stats for Neon

2016-04-14 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 04:18:30PM +0200, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > Any potentially privacy-sensitive information transfer should be opt-in, not > opt-out. > I'd assume that the vast majority of users will allow it (given that it's not > personally identifiable and they trust their distro), but

Re: [kde-community] user stats for Neon

2016-04-14 Thread Martin Graesslin
On Thursday, April 14, 2016 2:16:03 PM CEST Jonathan Riddell wrote: > A while ago Albert gave a talk at Akademy about collecting some data > on our users. This got me thinking and with Neon I wanted to see how > many installs we had. Our package install software will check for new > versions

Re: [kde-community] user stats for Neon

2016-04-14 Thread Mirko Boehm - KDE
Hi! > On 14 Apr 2016, at 15:16, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > A while ago Albert gave a talk at Akademy about collecting some data > on our users. This got me thinking and with Neon I wanted to see how > many installs we had. Our package install software will check for new >

Re: [kde-community] user stats for Neon

2016-04-14 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 14 April 2016 at 15:16, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > A while ago Albert gave a talk at Akademy about collecting some data > on our users. This got me thinking and with Neon I wanted to see how > many installs we had. Our package install software will check for new > versions

[kde-community] user stats for Neon

2016-04-14 Thread Jonathan Riddell
A while ago Albert gave a talk at Akademy about collecting some data on our users. This got me thinking and with Neon I wanted to see how many installs we had. Our package install software will check for new versions being available and I could count the IPs of this check but that's very