will be well.
In regards to Haralds script, it is fully functional now and appears to work
very well.
Original Message
On Nov 16, 2018, 4:37 AM, Luigi Toscano wrote:
> Andrew Crouthamel ha scritto:
>> I've been spending a lot of time browsing, searching, and filtering
, whether I want to or
not. Switching to a forum system puts the power in the users hands, to decide
what to receive.
This would be a good opportunity to update our infrastructure we use for
community discussion, and standardize on a smaller, more modern set of systems.
Andrew Crouthamel
FYI boud, I finally got around to making the changes we agreed to a few weeks
ago: https://phabricator.kde.org/D16474
Hopefully that helps.
Andrew Crouthamel
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, October 23, 2018 4:49 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On maandag 8 oktober 2018 21:10
That's great to hear, the performance aspect is certainly one that is
constantly echoed in Reddit and other social media.
Andrew Crouthamel
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, October 15, 2018 12:09 PM, Kai Uwe Broulik
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> on Saturday Myriam and I attended
one doesn't want to fill out everything, they don't have to. I've seen
plenty of people deleting some of the template or not filling out some fields.
Andrew Crouthamel
Why not just something generic:
SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS
Windows:
MacOS:
Linux/KDE Plasma:
(available in About System)
KDE Plasma Version:
KDE Frameworks Version:
Qt Version:
Andrew Crouthamel
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, October 4, 2018 12:13 PM, Nate Graham wrote:
>
Yeah I never really understood the purpose of that. Just set it to reported
status then or confirmed. Whatever it was before.
Original Message
On Sep 30, 2018, 12:42 PM, Nate Graham wrote:
> On 09/30/2018 10:39 AM, David Jarvie wrote:
>> I think that REPORTED is an ideal term
I like OPENED as well.
Original Message
On Sep 29, 2018, 6:17 PM, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 9:44 AM Valorie Zimmerman
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 1:48 AM Luigi Toscano
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Kai Uwe Broulik ha scritto:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > > Here
re information about our bug triaging procedures please read the
wiki located here:
https://community.kde.org/Guidelines_and_HOWTOs/Bug_triaging
Thank you for helping us make KDE software even better for everyone!
Andrew Crouthamel
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, September 18, 201
No problem, I can make that part of the procedure until we figure out an
automated method. After two weeks, send out a reminder, then two weeks later
close if no activity.
Andrew Crouthamel
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, September 17, 2018 3:10 PM, Michael Reeves
wrote:
>
At worst case, we could edit bug/create/user-message.html.tmpl which is the
text that shows at the top of the bug creation page.
Andrew Crouthamel
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, September 17, 2018 2:38 PM, Scott Harvey wrote:
> Can Bugzilla be configured to add boilerpl
?
Andrew Crouthamel
ms).
Regarding closing wishlist items with, I believe RESOLVED > LATER is a good
choice, it appears others are already doing that.
Here is my follow-up change recommendation based on feedback and research:
UNCONFIRMED -> REPORTED
WONTFIX -> INTENTIONAL
INVALID -> NOTABUG
Andrew C
Does anyone else have comments on status names? The name itself or yay/nay on
renames?
Here are some updated proposed names based on feedback and thesaurus searching:
UNCONFIRMED -> REPORTED or OPEN
WONTFIX -> ASDESIGNED or INTENTIONAL
INVALID -> NOTABUG or ERRONEOUS
Andrew C
? I know that isn't perfect, but was the best we could come up with
so far.
Andrew Crouthamel
Original Message
On Sep 5, 2018, 12:03 AM, Nate Graham wrote:
> On 09/04/2018 10:01 PM, Christoph Feck wrote:
>> I still oppose to name a status NEW (again). It only attr
feedback previously provided in the past two years.
Feedback? Comments? Consensus?
Thanks!
Andrew Crouthamel
Ok great, thanks for clearing that up. I'll make sure to add that information
to the Bug Triaging wiki page.
Sent from ProtonMail mobile
Original Message
On Sep 4, 2018, 2:46 AM, David Edmundson wrote:
> It's not a mistake. From the thread where permissions are relaxed:
>
Hi everyone,
I am currently a standard user in Bugzilla, and noticed that I am unable to
edit any of the Importance fields anywhere. I asked Nate about this and he told
me he believes this is a mistake, as last he could recall, standard users
should be able to change the second Importance
18 matches
Mail list logo
