Em 04-09-2015 17:17, Ben Cooksley escreveu:
>
> From my perspective at least, we will be migrating at the very least
> off of projects.kde.org (Chiliproject / Redmine). Considering the
> level of integration, it is extremely likely we'll be moving off of
> reviewboard.kde.org (Reviewboard) and
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 4:34 AM, Filipe Saraiva wrote:
> Em 04-09-2015 17:17, Ben Cooksley escreveu:
>>
>> From my perspective at least, we will be migrating at the very least
>> off of projects.kde.org (Chiliproject / Redmine). Considering the
>> level of integration, it is
Hi all,
Based on the responses now, i'm going to confirm Phabricator as our
tool of choice going forward.
I'll be sending a mail out to those who have been involved with it
thus far / who have volunteered to help so we can get moving forward
with implementing this.
Thanks,
Ben
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As it has been over a week now with no objections, i'll be considering
> this officially decided that we'll be moving forward with Phabricator
> if nobody objects in the next 24 hours.
> Because a number of
Hi,
On 5 September 2015 at 01:47, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> From my perspective at least, we will be migrating at the very least
> off of projects.kde.org (Chiliproject / Redmine). Considering the
> level of integration, it is extremely likely we'll be moving off of
>
> I'm concerned that with Differential, one will have to do a lot more
> than just sign up for an Identity and upload a diff to get started.
You can go to differential and click on the 'Create Diff' button.
One benefit is that it is much faster than in RB where you need to
wait for a huge list
Em 05-09-2015 15:35, Ben Cooksley escreveu:
> On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 1:30 AM, Filipe Saraiva wrote:
>>
>> I would like to ask you if Kanboard is going to be dropped for some
>> boards not related with some software, for example, the boards for KDE
>> e.V. activities or KDE Brazil.
Hi all,
As it has been over a week now with no objections, i'll be considering
this officially decided that we'll be moving forward with Phabricator
if nobody objects in the next 24 hours.
Because a number of policy matters need to be decided, it would be
nice if a small group of people would
I don't object and volunteer to help as I am able to create such a
plan for how we will implement Phabricator.
thanks,
Jeremy
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As it has been over a week now with no objections, i'll be considering
> this
> that we'll be moving forward with Phabricator
Can we confirm what parts we're moving forwards with right now
i.e out of projects.kde.org reviewboard, bugzilla, etc.
>Because a number of policy matters need to be decided, it would be
nice if a small group of people would work with sysadmin to
On Sat, 5 Sep 2015, Ben Cooksley wrote:
On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 8:01 AM, David Edmundson
wrote:
that we'll be moving forward with Phabricator
Can we confirm what parts we're moving forwards with right now
i.e out of projects.kde.org reviewboard, bugzilla, etc.
On Wednesday, August 26, 2015 20:57:25 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
+1
(I am using it as if it was official)
Same here. The Plasma team is in the process of migrating to phaaab!
already.
--
sebas
http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
On Thursday, August 27, 2015 16:00:56 David Edmundson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org wrote:
On Wednesday, August 26, 2015 20:57:25 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
+1
(I am using it as if it was official)
Same here. The Plasma team is in the process of
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org wrote:
On Wednesday, August 26, 2015 20:57:25 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
+1
(I am using it as if it was official)
Same here. The Plasma team is in the process of migrating to
phaaab!
already.
To clarify, the mobile
+1! Yay!
On 27 Aug 2015, at 17:00, David Edmundson da...@davidedmundson.co.uk wrote:
Same here. The Plasma team is in the process of migrating to phaaab!
already.
To clarify, the mobile only stuff is currently in there for trial.
The rest is pending.
--
Mirko Boehm |
+1
(I am using it as if it was official)
On 26 August 2015 at 20:05, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote:
Hello all,
So we've been evaluating different options to modernize our tooling, and for
some reason it looks like we're still waiting on some external pressure to
pick one. I'll then try to
16 matches
Mail list logo