Hi Han,
let's have this discussion public on kde-core-devel and kde-framworks,
so other can contribute.
On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 1:29 PM hanyoung wrote:
>
> Hi Dominik,
>
> Thank you for your time. This is my first time writing a library, I tried my
> best by looking
> at existing KDE frameworks
Hi Han,
just having a quick glance at the code, and I feel like there is a lot of
polishing
missing. I'll give some examples, but this is by no means a complete review,
and I'll not comment on technical aspects at all, since this is not the
domain
of my expertise.
- #pragma once: It's used in
Hi Steve,
Stephen Kelly schrieb am Mo., 30. Dez. 2019, 11:57:
>
> On 30/12/2019 10:55, Christoph Cullmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >>> With my KTextEditor hat on: KF6:TextDocument implies somehow a link
> >>> to QTextDocument or KF6:TextEditor, which both is incorrect, right?
> >>
> >>
Hi,
Stephen Kelly schrieb am So., 29. Dez. 2019, 15:03:
>
> On 28/12/2019 23:30, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> > Why are you proposing to do a step back instead to the old state, which
> > everyone including you considered not that satisfying?
>
> Because it's a temporary situation. We
57 CET schrieb Volker Krause:
> > > > On Sunday, 22 December 2019 09:46:02 CET Dominik Haumann wrote:
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > in any case, maybe the discussed points should go to the KF6
> > > > > workboard?
Hi all,
in any case, maybe the discussed points should go to the KF6 workboard?
https://phabricator.kde.org/project/view/310/
I indeed believe that consistency in the KF5 world is an important feature,
so Friedrich does have a point here. Other framework additions had to adapt
as well (what
Hi Volker,
may I suggest that you also blog about this at some point in time? :-)
I know this is additional work (sorry), but it helps a lot visibility wise.
This blog can then be posted at reddit/r/linux et al...
Best regards
Dominik
On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 1:03 PM Volker Krause wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 3:59 PM Arjen Hiemstra wrote:
> On 06-09-2019 02:49, Aleix Pol wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 10:53 PM Arjen Hiemstra
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 02-09-2019 19:26, Luigi Toscano wrote:
> >> > Arjen Hiemstra ha scritto:
>
[...]
> >> That's actually a good point,
Kevin Ottens schrieb am Do., 28. März 2019, 09:29:
> Hello,
>
> On Thursday, 28 March 2019 09:16:11 CET Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > Please note that the commits in this instance were pushed without
> > review, so restrictions on merge requests wouldn't make a difference
> > in this case
... wasn't there also some python related work by Stefan? Or is that
unrelated?
Greetings
Dominik
Am Mo., 5. Nov. 2018, 16:20 hat Shaheed Haque
geschrieben:
> I'm afraid that there has been no progress as I am buried in "startup"
> mode. I'm not sure when that might change.
>
> On Mon, 5 Nov
Hi everyone,
it just happened to me again, that I want to commit/push a change of
someone else (first-time contributor) with the correct --author="x y
" data.
But Phabricator hides the email address, so I either have to ask via
phabricator messages for the email address, which is time consuming,
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Martin Koller wrote:
>>> On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Martin Koller wrote:
>>> > Should http://commitfilter.kde.org/ still exist ?
>>> > Currently I
=1420501=kdeplasma-addons
- Dominik Haumann
On Feb. 5, 2017, 6:11 p.m., Pascal VITOUX wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.
n any case.
- Dominik Haumann
On Feb. 4, 2017, 12:03 a.m., Pascal VITOUX wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.review
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 2:37 PM, David Faure wrote:
> 15th November 2016. KDE today announces the release of KDE Frameworks 5.28.0.
>
> KDE Frameworks are 70 addon libraries to Qt which provide a wide variety of·
> commonly needed functionality in mature, peer reviewed and well
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Hi, my proposal would be to make KDE Applications 17.08 the last release we
> accept applications based on kdelibs4, that means people have a year until KDE
> Applications 17.12 to port the applications from the list
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Thomas Friedrichsmeier
<thomas.friedrichsme...@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 22:07:57 +0100
> Dominik Haumann <dhaum...@kde.org> wrote:
[...]
>> Therefore, I would like to propose v2015 as required compiler
>> an
Hi all,
I installed Qt 5.6.0 and MSVC 2015, and surprisingly Kate
including all its dependencies compiled out of the box.
I still see QStringLiteral fixes from time to time on the commit
mailing list. Given MSVC 2015 Community Edition is available
just like v2013, and it seems to work I believe
gt; Cheers,
> Emmanuel
>
> [1] https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifications/file-manager-interface/
> [2] https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127004/
>
> 2016-03-19 21:16 GMT+01:00 Dominik Haumann <dhaum...@kde.org>:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> in Kate's tab bar
Hi,
in Kate's tab bar I would like to implement a context menu action
"Open Containing Folder". In KDE, this should open dolphin and
preselect the specific file. On Windows, it should open the Explorer
and do the same.
It seems Qt Creator has some code to do exactly this:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 11:15 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Wednesday 06 January 2016, a les 14:56:48, Martin Koller va escriure:
>> In the section about KApplication -> QApplication, I find:
>>
>> Make sure to:
>> Call QCoreApplication::setApplicationName() and others ...
>>
>>
->modifiers() == Qt::ControlModifier
#ifdef Q_OS_MAC
&& KGlobalSettings::wheelMouseZooms()
#endif
) { // ...
That way we at least do not touch the current 4.x code for Linux (which works
fine, as I understand), and the workaraound is ok for os X...
Would that be ok?
On Sept. 23, 2014, 3:01 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
Qt cannot distiguish because there's nothing to distinguish - the driver
generates synthetic wheel event for the inertia.
You can btw. turn that censored off.
Seems an issue with inertial scrolling on X11 as well
I'll only comment on the application side:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Sergio Martins iamser...@gmail.com wrote:
Btw, what are the c++98/c++11 requirements for applications ? I could only
find
the page for frameworks.
For applications, it's 100% up to the application developer. I'm
On Saturday 01 August 2015 03:09:14 Kevin Kofler wrote:
Christoph Cullmann wrote:
I think one of the problems with our current Bugzilla database is that it
contains a lot of old bugs and wishs.
As the manpower is limited and we sometimes not even keep up with the
incoming new bugs,
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Christoph Cullmann
cullm...@absint.com wrote:
Hi,
I think one of the problems with our current Bugzilla database is that it
contains a lot of old bugs and wishs.
As the manpower is limited and we sometimes not even keep up with the
incoming new bugs,
On Jan. 21, 2015, 10:10 vorm., Dominik Haumann wrote:
processcore/process.h, line 40
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121831/diff/3/?file=343193#file343193line40
Is virtual needed here?
Gregor Mi wrote:
Does it hurt here to have it virtual? I thought, if in doubt 'virtual
On Jan. 21, 2015, 10:10 vorm., Dominik Haumann wrote:
processcore/process.h, line 40
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121831/diff/3/?file=343193#file343193line40
Is virtual needed here?
Gregor Mi wrote:
Does it hurt here to have it virtual? I thought, if in doubt 'virtual
On Wednesday 21 January 2015 22:20:18 Eike Hein wrote:
On 01/21/2015 05:12 AM, Ben Cooksley wrote:
Hi all,
As promised in the earlier thread, i'd like to present the sysadmin
report on the state of the infrastructure surrounding our code.
As someone on the original git infra team,
Apps, Dominik Haumann, Eike Hein, and John
Tapsell.
Repository: libksysguard
Description
---
In process.h there are several public fields. I propose to encapsulate the
private fields with getter methods. I implemented it exemplary for the fields
'login', 'uid' and 'euid
?
Before, we just wrote into the varialbes.
Now, we use the setters, which also sets 'changes |= Process::Gids;'
Is that maybe an issue? I myself don't know the code well enough to see
this here.
- Dominik Haumann
On Jan. 19, 2015, 9:37 nachm., Gregor Mi wrote
On Jan. 14, 2015, 3:28 p.m., Hrvoje Senjan wrote:
ftr, this is a BIC change, so best would be to bump the soversion
Because it modified process.h? Why are the members not hidden behind a
d-pointer then? Is such a BIC change then allowed at all ?
- Dominik
role.
Hm, well yes, it probably doesn't make much sense to copy the text in terms
of 3h 2m ago either. So guess this is fine... Or we could even leave it
empty, i.e. return QString().
- Dominik Haumann
On Jan. 12, 2015, 2:07 p.m., Gregor Mi wrote
On Jan. 10, 2015, 4:29 p.m., Dominik Haumann wrote:
processui/timeutil.h, line 67
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121717/diff/2/?file=337999#file337999line67
No sure, but maybe in some language we need a proper singular / plural
handling here, too?
Same
.
- Dominik Haumann
On Jan. 9, 2015, 10:25 a.m., Gregor Mi wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121717
-fix-it-0
(and a followup here:
http://kate-editor.org/2012/04/06/crash-through-d-bus-calls/ )
The solution is also to use a QPointer, on the dialog itself (and maybe
additionally on the this QObject).
In other words, your fix is probably more than just a short-term workaround ;)
- Dominik
) and the embedded konsole
was shown:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331724
I still get the crash when I apply the proposed patch.
- Dominik Haumann
On June 18, 2014, 5:50 p.m., Jeremy Whiting wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e
:236
- Dominik Haumann
On June 18, 2014, 7:24 p.m., Jeremy Whiting wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118816
On Monday, December 16, 2013 00:29:45 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Hi, looking at http://techbase.kde.org/Development/Review_Board I wonder how
any of our newbies has ever been able to push a patch to reviewboard if
we're suggesting to use that amazing number of hard things to do.
Does anyone
On Tuesday 05 November 2013 17:13:01 Milian Wolff wrote:
On Tuesday 05 November 2013 17:04:47 Kevin Ottens wrote:
snip
* sandsmark cleaned up KTextEditorSpellingInterface;
I think this was discussed before, but I forgot it again :(
The KTextEditor stuff, will it stay in KDELibs for
On Tuesday 05 November 2013 17:20:27 Dominik Haumann wrote:
On Tuesday 05 November 2013 17:13:01 Milian Wolff wrote:
On Tuesday 05 November 2013 17:04:47 Kevin Ottens wrote:
snip
* sandsmark cleaned up KTextEditorSpellingInterface;
I think this was discussed before, but I forgot
., Dominik Haumann wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111000/
---
(Updated June 13, 2013, 5:10 p.m.)
Review
On May 7, 2013, 12:50 p.m., Dominik Haumann wrote:
The patch itself is fine and most likely does not introduce regressions in
terms of misbehavior.
Still, is never showing an icon the way to go? Another way to work around
this by default would be an additional function called
of this
is, however, that this leads to inconsistent ui's.
It this is needed, this patch works against this, though.
- Dominik Haumann
On May 6, 2013, 8:59 p.m., Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit
On May 7, 2013, 12:50 p.m., Dominik Haumann wrote:
The patch itself is fine and most likely does not introduce regressions in
terms of misbehavior.
Still, is never showing an icon the way to go? Another way to work around
this by default would be an additional function called
On May 7, 2013, 12:50 p.m., Dominik Haumann wrote:
The patch itself is fine and most likely does not introduce regressions in
terms of misbehavior.
Still, is never showing an icon the way to go? Another way to work around
this by default would be an additional function called
On Sunday, 24. March 2013 16:25:20 Christoph Cullmann wrote:
On Thursday 21 March 2013 19:02:13 David Faure wrote:
I'm afraid it's one or the other:
* safe code, always a working file available, but hardlinks get
splitted up
* possibility to corrupt the existing file, but a backup
Hi David,
since you pushed QSaveFile to Qt5.1, can you comment on this?
Thanks!
Dominik
On Sunday, March 10, 2013 16:03:06 Dominik Haumann wrote:
Hi k-c-d / kwrite-devel,
Kate uses KSaveFile in KDE 4.10 to avoid data loss during save operations.
According to [1] KSaveFile
Hi k-c-d / kwrite-devel,
Kate uses KSaveFile in KDE 4.10 to avoid data loss during save operations.
According to [1] KSaveFile will be deprecated in favor of QSaveFile with
kf5/Qt5.1.
Unfortunately, using KSaveFile introduces quite some regressions in Kate:
1. KSaveFile: Kate/kwrite makes a
On Tuesday, February 12, 2013 00:56:05 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Someone pointed me to
http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=kate.gita=commitdiffh=3adf3cc5473c533f382ae8a48
1e452289a56bab3hp=5addc104e5c181c25a3f16d596602d2755db2128
I have not had time to look at it but fix plugin loading in KDE SC
On Saturday, December 22, 2012 10:44:22 AM Chusslove Illich wrote:
I have written up the headers and Doxygen pages for the Ki18n framework as
it should finally look like, available here:
http://nedohodnik.net/misc/ki18n-kf5-01/html/index.html
that we have in Kate.
Your patch simply uses the best height in two places now, instead of just one.
I've tested it and it works as expected, so I'd say ship it :-)
- Dominik Haumann
On Nov. 15, 2012, 12:47 p.m., Aurélien Gâteau wrote
? :)
- Dominik Haumann
On Nov. 15, 2012, 6:40 a.m., David Edmundson wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107332
kdelibs build. It's very much appreciated, if
someone else can test this.
Thanks,
Dominik Haumann
this.
Thanks,
Dominik Haumann
patch.
- Dominik
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107023/#review20809
---
On Oct. 24, 2012, 5:56 p.m., Dominik Haumann
:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107023/#review20817
---
On Oct. 24, 2012, 9:27 p.m., Dominik Haumann wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http
-project.org/#change,32359
Many thanks to Kent Hansen for fixing this bug!
Right, thanks for taking care of this + keeping us up to date.
Greetings,
Dominik
On Thursday 24 May 2012 10:59:21 Dominik Haumann wrote:
Hi Milian,
CC: kde-core-devel, as this is really a tough issue
On Thursday, 12. July 2012 18:13:22 David Faure wrote:
On Thursday 05 July 2012 15:39:33 Dominik Haumann wrote:
Here, startPos is a Cursor, but we cannot see its values.
It would help tremendously sometimes to know the line/column values. So
having startPos=(4, 2) instead of startPos
Hi,
in Kate, we have a (virtual) Cursor class:
class Cursor
{
// public functions
private:
int m_line;
int m_column
};
Unfortunately, in backtraces by Dr. Konqi we only get:
#11 0x7f1c85128b2a in KateLayoutCache::updateViewCache (this=0x54db630,
startPos=...,
On Thursday, July 05, 2012 03:56:16 PM Andreas Pakulat wrote:
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Dominik Haumann dhaum...@kde.org wrote:
Is there any way to provide this feature to get better backtraces by
default in Dr. Konqi?
It might work with gdb's pretty-printers, but dr. konqi needs
Hi,
On Sunday, July 01, 2012 09:21:08 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Diumenge, 1 de juliol de 2012, a les 08:02:28, Boudewijn Rempt
I'm not concerned that users cannot access the help when they are
off-line. That's a vanishingly rare situation these days
I disagree, as a matter of fact, I
Hi everyone,
so let's sum up and get back to arguments.
1. Versioning for our KDE SC Releases
It was mentioned that a wiki automatically provides versioning. However, what
is completely not covered, yet, is the fact that we have different KDE SC
releases. There is not 'branching' support for
On Friday, 25. May 2012 21:42:50 Stephen Kelly wrote:
Christoph Cullmann wrote:
Still, a fix for QtScript would be the nicest solution or a port to the
new engine provided in Qt5, as I understood, there QtScript is anyway
deprecated in favour of the V8 based new variant?
Nope. QtScript
On Thursday, May 24, 2012 12:57:14 David Faure wrote:
On Thursday 24 May 2012 10:59:21 Dominik Haumann wrote:
they said they will probably not spent the considerable amount of time
in updating the archaic jsc checkout used in QtScript.
What about the solution of updating the JSC
On Friday, May 25, 2012 11:14:17 Dominik Haumann wrote:
So it's probably non-trivial to create this patch (haven't looked into
it, though), a dead end as it's Qt4, and unclear, whether such a patch
would be accepted at all in the Qt 4.x line, given that the focus is
on Qt5 now.
And it's
On Friday, May 25, 2012 11:55:08 Christoph Cullmann wrote:
On Friday, May 25, 2012 11:14:17 Dominik Haumann wrote:
And it's unclear, whether a jsc update would fix the issue, btw :-)
Still, a fix for QtScript would be the nicest solution or a port to the
Right, maybe an increase
On Friday, 25. May 2012 12:32:07 Martin Sandsmark wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:03:43PM +0200, Dominik Haumann wrote:
Right, maybe an increase of the allowed memory would work, or similar
changes...
Isn't the problem that the pointer size it uses is too small?
As you see, I didn't
Hi Milian,
CC: kde-core-devel, as this is really a tough issue...
there are other applications like Kile that heavily use QtScript for scripting
as well, so porting away KatePart from QtScript may solve the issue for
KDevelop, the real problem lies (as you say) within QtScript, not Kate. The
On Friday, 6. April 2012 12:53:02 Stephen Kelly wrote:
Hi there,
I'm trying to figure out why KPushButton has a feature of a 'delayed' menu.
Why would applications need that? What problems does it solve? Can the
problem be solved in Qt?
I think so.
The usage of setDelayedMenu is very
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102490/#review6174
---
dolphin/src/views/dolphinview.cpp
On Aug. 30, 2011, 4:55 p.m., Dominik Haumann wrote:
dolphin/src/views/dolphinview.cpp, line 691
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102490/diff/1/?file=33274#file33274line691
Just a maybe:
if event-delta() is 8, numDegrees rounds to 0 due to the int
conversion. Same
On July 2, 2011, 9:49 p.m., Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
hmm. but now things are still done twice in a kde session, no?
what was wrong with the suggestion to notify qt that it should update
stuff?
Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
createApplicationPalette() is indeed called twice when running
On Saturday, 16. April 2011, David Faure wrote:
On Friday 15 April 2011, Vladimir Koković wrote:
HI,
Please, return removed Konqueror feature bug (embedded advanced text
editor) in KDE 4.6 !!!
Wrong list, and wrong request.
We didn't remove such a feature. If it doesn't appear
74 matches
Mail list logo