On Thursday 29 January 2015 22:02:15 Thomas Lübking wrote:
On Donnerstag, 29. Januar 2015 12:54:25 CET, Jan Kundrát wrote:
On Thursday, 29 January 2015 12:49:17 CEST, Christoph Feck wrote:
If it even allows to edit a change request from a different
person online, then I *want that*. I find
On Thursday 29 January 2015 00:10:02 Jan Kundrát wrote:
It will be even easier -- the upcoming Gerrit 2.11 contains an
online editor, so the workflow will be open file, edit it, push a
button for making a change request.
If it even allows to edit a change request from a different person
On Thursday, 29 January 2015 12:49:17 CEST, Christoph Feck wrote:
If it even allows to edit a change request from a different person
online, then I *want that*. I find it much more time consuming and
demotivating to nitpick small style/whitespace changes, than to simply
edit them out.
Yes,
On Donnerstag, 29. Januar 2015 12:54:25 CET, Jan Kundrát wrote:
On Thursday, 29 January 2015 12:49:17 CEST, Christoph Feck wrote:
If it even allows to edit a change request from a different
person online, then I *want that*. I find it much more time
consuming and demotivating to nitpick small
On Monday, 26 January 2015 18:11:34 CEST, Thomas Lübking wrote:
Eg. I can very well see that somebody concerned w/ i18n would
like to lookup code via cgit (or similar - no flames here,
please ;-), download a single file, fix a so far untranslated
string, diff -pru it with the original and
On Montag, 26. Januar 2015 01:38:54 CET, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Thomas Lübking wrote:
If you had followed the discussion or at least looked at that feature
matrix Milian started and that you liked to high-handedly deem as rubbish,
you'd have noticed that webfrontends to upload patches (like
Thomas Lübking wrote:
If you had followed the discussion or at least looked at that feature
matrix Milian started and that you liked to high-handedly deem as rubbish,
you'd have noticed that webfrontends to upload patches (like suggested
https://tools.wmflabs.org/gerrit-patch-uploader/) are
Sorry, not fast enough away from the Ctrl key.
On Freitag, 23. Januar 2015 15:21:34 CEST, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
Gerrit is just a kind of reviewboard with a git integration, phabricator is a
whole integrated development platform.
And, apart from detail-by-detail comparisons, gerrit
On Friday, 23 January 2015 15:21:34 CEST, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
There is no way an artist who has a nice patch for Krita is
ever going to be able to inducted into becoming a Krita
developer if they have to follow
instructions like this:
https://techbase.kde.org/Development/Gerrit
Hi
On Freitag, 23. Januar 2015 15:21:34 CEST, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
Gerrit is just a kind of reviewboard with a git integration,
phabricator is a whole integrated development platform.
And, apart from detail-by-detail comparisons, gerrit would be
an exceedingly bad choice for a community like
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Milian Wolff wrote:
Hey all,
I started this page just now:
https://community.kde.org/Sysadmin/FutureInfrastructure
It's pretty limited, so far. I hope everyone could help out and extend it and
fill it with the information and verify that each contestant is displayed in a
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Milian Wolff m...@milianw.de wrote:
Hey all,
I started this page just now:
https://community.kde.org/Sysadmin/FutureInfrastructure
It's pretty limited, so far. I hope everyone could help out and extend it
and
fill it with the information and verify that
Hm... That matrix needs a heck of a lot of work before it's worth its
while. It basically perpetuates the illusion that phabricator and gerrit
are the same thing, which isn't correct.
Gerrit is basically a reviewboard with a git integration, phabricator is a
whole integrated development
Hey all,
I started this page just now:
https://community.kde.org/Sysadmin/FutureInfrastructure
It's pretty limited, so far. I hope everyone could help out and extend it and
fill it with the information and verify that each contestant is displayed in a
fair light. Please add links, comments
14 matches
Mail list logo
