On Sunday 03 July 2011 03:31:07 Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
On 6/26/11, Ingo Klöcker kloec...@kde.org wrote:
On Tuesday 07 June 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
A Tuesday, June 07, 2011, Kevin Ottens va escriure:
On Tuesday 7 June 2011 01:26:17 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
A Tuesday, June 07,
On 6/26/11, Ingo Klöcker kloec...@kde.org wrote:
On Tuesday 07 June 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
A Tuesday, June 07, 2011, Kevin Ottens va escriure:
On Tuesday 7 June 2011 01:26:17 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
A Tuesday, June 07, 2011, Kevin Ottens va escriure:
Well, obviously a Tier 1
On Monday, June 27, 2011 22:18:08 Ingo Klöcker wrote:
Localization is not only about user visible texts, It is also about
kconfig having per language keys, it is about kstandarddirs::locate
being able to find localized icons, etc.
I hear you, but by the definition of Tier 1 none of this
On Tuesday 28 Jun 2011 17:27:35 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Monday, June 27, 2011 22:18:08 Ingo Klöcker wrote:
Localization is not only about user visible texts, It is also about
kconfig having per language keys, it is about kstandarddirs::locate
being able to find localized icons, etc.
On Sunday 26 June 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
A Sunday, June 26, 2011, Ingo Klöcker va escriure:
On Tuesday 07 June 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
A Tuesday, June 07, 2011, Kevin Ottens va escriure:
On Tuesday 7 June 2011 01:26:17 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
A Tuesday, June 07,
On Tuesday 07 June 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
A Tuesday, June 07, 2011, Kevin Ottens va escriure:
On Tuesday 7 June 2011 01:26:17 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
A Tuesday, June 07, 2011, Kevin Ottens va escriure:
Well, obviously a Tier 1 framework would have to use tr()
instead of
A Sunday, June 26, 2011, Ingo Klöcker va escriure:
On Tuesday 07 June 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
A Tuesday, June 07, 2011, Kevin Ottens va escriure:
On Tuesday 7 June 2011 01:26:17 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
A Tuesday, June 07, 2011, Kevin Ottens va escriure:
Well, obviously a
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
A Tuesday, June 07, 2011, John Layt va escriure:
We discussed translation briefly at Platform 11 and Qt moving to or
supporting .po is something we really want to push for at QCS. I really
hope we have some people
On Tuesday 07 Jun 2011 18:57:22 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
A Tuesday, June 07, 2011, John Layt va escriure:
We discussed translation briefly at Platform 11 and Qt moving to or
supporting .po is something we really want to push for at QCS. I really
hope we have some people knowledgable about
On Wednesday 08 Jun 2011 19:48:30 Mark wrote:
Just a comment that might be of interest to some (just found this link):
http://code.google.com/p/simple-gettext/
It also has a Qt wrapper..
Interesting, but not very active, GPL3 so not something that could be used in
library code, and lacking
A Wednesday, June 08, 2011, John Layt va escriure:
On Wednesday 08 Jun 2011 19:48:30 Mark wrote:
Just a comment that might be of interest to some (just found this link):
http://code.google.com/p/simple-gettext/
It also has a Qt wrapper..
Interesting, but not very active, GPL3 so not
A Tuesday, June 07, 2011, Kevin Ottens va escriure:
On Tuesday 7 June 2011 01:26:17 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
A Tuesday, June 07, 2011, Kevin Ottens va escriure:
Well, obviously a Tier 1 framework would have to use tr() instead of
i18n() for its translation needs.
Are we still going
On Tuesday, June 7, 2011 08:39:58 Inge Wallin wrote:
So a well defined API that applications could use, and a well isolated way
to include a set of implementations would be nice. We are dealing with
the best way to make this happen is to create a concrete plan and propose it.
for
On Tuesday 07 June 2011 08:46:54 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
This means that if you want Tier 1 frameworks to be translatable you need
either to teach Qt to understand gettext files natively or to make Tier 1
frameworks use pure based Qt/Linguist solutions which does not fit either in
what
On 07.06.11 11:51:29, Manuel Sput Nickschas wrote:
On Tuesday 07 June 2011 08:46:54 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
This means that if you want Tier 1 frameworks to be translatable you need
either to teach Qt to understand gettext files natively or to make Tier 1
frameworks use pure based
On Tuesday 07 Jun 2011 00:38:58 Kevin Ottens wrote:
Right, however there's also a plan ATM to get the settings between KLocale
and QLocale shared. John is working on that right now, so it depends a bit
on the outcome, in any cases the situation is likely to improve on that
particular point.
On Tuesday 07 Jun 2011 10:51:29 Manuel Sput Nickschas wrote:
On Tuesday 07 June 2011 08:46:54 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
This means that if you want Tier 1 frameworks to be translatable you need
either to teach Qt to understand gettext files natively or to make Tier 1
frameworks use pure
A Tuesday, June 07, 2011, John Layt va escriure:
We discussed translation briefly at Platform 11 and Qt moving to or
supporting .po is something we really want to push for at QCS. I really
hope we have some people knowledgable about translation at QCS able to
argue the point, otherwise please
Hello lists,
disclaimer
As, Sebas pointed out we've been meeting here to work on plans to improve our
frameworks offering leading to the decision of leaving the current kdelibs
model behind and prepare for a more modular suite named KDE Frameworks. If
you didn't read his email yet, please do
On Tuesday 7 June 2011 00:17:23 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
A Monday, June 06, 2011, Kevin Ottens va escriure:
Hello lists,
Throughout this example we will refer to the following graph:
http://files.kde.org/ervin/platform11/kde-frameworks-dependencies-plan.pd
f
Shall i read from this
On Tuesday 7 June 2011 01:26:17 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
A Tuesday, June 07, 2011, Kevin Ottens va escriure:
Well, obviously a Tier 1 framework would have to use tr() instead of
i18n() for its translation needs.
Are we still going to use .po or you plan on us moving to Qt translation
21 matches
Mail list logo
