On Monday, February 13, 2012 17:51:23 Shaun Reich wrote:
hate to chime in as well, but i think replacing the Windows shell
should definitely be something that's looked at. imho it makes a lot
of sense. face it, the Windows shell sucks.
how many windows users realistically change the shell,
On Tuesday 14 February 2012, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Monday, February 13, 2012 17:51:23 Shaun Reich wrote:
hate to chime in as well, but i think replacing the Windows shell
should definitely be something that's looked at. imho it makes a lot
of sense. face it, the Windows shell sucks.
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Martin Gräßlin mgraess...@kde.org wrote:
On Tuesday 14 February 2012 19:12:58 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Tuesday 14 February 2012, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Monday, February 13, 2012 17:51:23 Shaun Reich wrote:
hate to chime in as well, but i think
On Saturday 11 February 2012 20:00:01 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
kded... for what things is this needed when running only a single
application ?
The main reason currently is so that it watches desktop files and keeps
ksycoca up-to-date.
The other uses of KDED are on-demand (kssl, timezones,
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.orgwrote:
Pau had the idea to write a fake libdbus for Windows, which internally
doesn't
talk to a dbus daemon, but which uses the Windows messaging service.
On Linux DBUS is no problem. On Mac ? I don't know. Probably better
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Andre Heinecke aheine...@intevation.dewrote:
The perception that dbus is a problem on Windows is outdated. Dbus was a
huge
problem on windows but currently the situation is pretty good, we reall
have
no known issues with it. We can run multiple instances
On Saturday, February 11, 2012 20:00:01 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
It is cool to be able to replace the Windows shell... but does it make sense
fwiw, it's always been my opinion that it does not make sense to do this.
it doesn't solve a real problem on the windows platform, and as such does not
On Saturday 11 February 2012, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Hi,
KDE is based on Qt, and Qt is very cross platform.
While there are Windows and also OSX builds of KDE4, they are not
really successful.
I mean, it's not like everybody is running amarok today under
Windows, or kate, or kdevelop,
On Monday 13 February 2012 22:57:56 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Saturday, February 11, 2012 20:00:01 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
It is cool to be able to replace the Windows shell... but does it
make sense
fwiw, it's always been my opinion that it does not make sense to do
this.
it doesn't
hate to chime in as well, but i think replacing the Windows shell
should definitely be something that's looked at. imho it makes a lot
of sense. face it, the Windows shell sucks.
why are we replacing their apps and adding our own (dolphin kicking
explorer's butt)?
because the default ones are
2012/2/13 Ingo Klöcker kloec...@kde.org
Are there more important reasons than it scares Windows users? Windows
does already run so many services on its own. Why do a few more
processes matter? Why do the users care anyway? IMNSHO, they should stop
looking at their task manager or process
11 matches
Mail list logo
