---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122394/
---
(Updated Feb. 3, 2015, 12:21 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On Tuesday, 3 February 2015 12:37:30 CEST, Martin Sandsmark wrote:
So everyone with a KDE account will be able to push to any KDE project,
bypassing Gerrit?
Yes.
--
Trojitá, a fast Qt IMAP e-mail client -- http://trojita.flaska.net/
full trace with debug output
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2015/02/03/67a59590-84a4-4d30-88aa-332d9f068a2c__Solid-20150203.log
Thanks,
René J.V. Bertin
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 12:02:40PM +0100, Martin Sandsmark wrote:
Yes, but as I said this doesn't really solve it at all. As I said, for long
discussions it still adds a lot of space and noise into the code, which makes
following the flow of the code extremely hard to do (at least for me
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 02:01:22PM +0100, Jan Kundrát wrote:
Due to the nature of build jobs which constitute a pretty bursty
load, renting VMs sounds like a cost-effective approach for our
scale. I do not expect that it would make financial sense for us to
procure enough physical HW to cover
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:08:49AM +0100, Jan Kundrát wrote:
Gerrit will act as a primary repository host. This will be completely
transparent to the users. Developers who do not want to change their
workflow will witness no user-visible changes. All existing clones will
work, and developers
14 messages in 90 minutes on a topic we are discussing for weeks now. Please
realise that that is why people do not engage on this mailing list. It is not
the choice of tools.
Thanks,
Mirko.
On 03 Feb 2015, at 12:23, Martin Sandsmark martin.sandsm...@kde.org wrote:
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122403/
---
Review request for KDE Software on Mac OS X, KDE Runtime, Phonon, and
/MacPorts with kdelibs 4.14.4 (git/master), kde4-runtime
(git/master) and kde4-workspace (git/master).
File Attachments
full trace with debug output
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2015/02/03/67a59590-84a4-4d30-88aa-332d9f068a2c__Solid-20150203.log
-84a4-4d30-88aa-332d9f068a2c__Solid-20150203.log
Thanks,
René J.V. Bertin
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 12:40:01PM +0100, Mirko Boehm wrote:
14 messages in 90 minutes on a topic we are discussing for weeks now.
Please realise that that is why people do not engage on this mailing list.
It is not the choice of tools.
Sorry for being late to the discussion, but I haven't
On Лют. 3, 2015, 7:08 до полудня, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
components/CMakeLists.txt, line 2
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122320/diff/3/?file=346480#file346480line2
that seems unrelated change.
sorry, i forgot to remove it -- i had to comment it because i had compile
errors
full trace with debug output
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2015/02/03/67a59590-84a4-4d30-88aa-332d9f068a2c__Solid-20150203.log
Thanks,
René J.V. Bertin
On Лют. 3, 2015, 7:08 до полудня, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
startkde/kcminit/CMakeLists.txt, line 16
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122320/diff/3/?file=346481#file346481line16
you find optional, but link required. OSX devs won't be happy with that
change ;-)
you need
Hello,
First of all, thank you Boud for the wise words.
On Tuesday 03 February 2015 11:17:59 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
On Mon, 2 Feb 2015, Milian Wolff wrote:
Sigh, I find it highly sad to read this over and over again.
Well, this whole discussion makes me extremely sad. What people have to
On Tuesday, 3 February 2015 11:36:37 CEST, Martin Sandsmark wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:44:22PM -0200, Thiago Macieira wrote:
Many of your complaints about usability (threading, replies,
etc.) are solved
or at least partially addressed in the new Gerrit UI, which
versions like 2.7
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 06:49:28PM +0100, Eike Hein wrote:
I disagree - having the comment in a floating popup instead
of breaking up source code makes it easier to read the code
for me.
I just want to back up this point.
As mentioned already, we've been using Gerrit at work for quite a while
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 01:16:05PM +0100, Jan Kundrát wrote:
Your mail suggested that they apparently do not care about improving
their UI, because if they did, they would have solved everything
already. I disagree with that, and provide evidence which supports
the idea that Gerrit upstream in
On Tuesday, 3 February 2015 11:48:30 CEST, Martin Sandsmark wrote:
As mentioned already, we've been using Gerrit at work for quite a while now,
and having the code broken up by comments (sometimes many lines in case of a
discussion) makes it extremely hard to actually follow the flow of the
On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 10:49:58AM -0200, Thiago Macieira wrote:
They would have if they still had major problems with the usability of the
tool. It probably just so happens that all the backers are used to the
interface, however bad it might be, and don't feel the need to sponsor such a
On Tuesday, 3 February 2015 11:53:30 CEST, Martin Sandsmark wrote:
I think the point was more that what Gerrit has fixed were simple UI
glitches, not radical improvements that change the existing design to make
it easier for less experienced or casual users (or even experienced users,
but that's
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 11:55:58AM +0100, Jan Kundrát wrote:
I believe that this is fixed in the new change UI:
We use 2.7, which I assume has the new UI.
- The diff viewer shows comments minimized/collapsed and in a way
which consumes less space.
Yes, but as I said this doesn't really solve
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 11:46:10AM +0100, Jan Kundrát wrote:
Yes, the one we're testing in KDE is reasonably recent. It lives at
https://gerrit.vesnicky.cesnet.cz/ , and it uses the new change
screen by default.
Thanks!
And now I see that the source/line from the comments is already a link.
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 11:58:50AM +0100, Jan Kundrát wrote:
As they completely revamped the change screen UI in 2.8, I do not
think that this point is true, either.
It doesn't really seem revamped, mostly just fixing all the glitches, not
really changes in the basic assumptions about how it
On Mon, 2 Feb 2015, Milian Wolff wrote:
Sigh, I find it highly sad to read this over and over again.
Well, this whole discussion makes me extremely sad. What people have to
learn is that _arguments_ only go so far. People can feel they're
double-plus extra-super right, and still at one
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:44:22PM -0200, Thiago Macieira wrote:
Many of your complaints about usability (threading, replies, etc.) are solved
or at least partially addressed in the new Gerrit UI, which versions like 2.7
have. It might not be the default on the installation, so check the
El Dimarts, 3 de febrer de 2015, a les 00:49:17, Martin Klapetek va escriure:
Hi,
so we decided with KDE Telepathy to join the big guys and become
part of KDE Applications 15.04. So I'd like to request a move of
KDE Telepathy repos[1] to kdenetwork/. This is also a mail to Urs
Wolfer asking
A Terça, 3 de Fevereiro de 2015 01:07:55 Albert Astals Cid escreveu:
El Dissabte, 31 de gener de 2015, a les 00:51:30, Ben Cooksley va escriure:
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 12:07 AM, Kevin Krammer kram...@kde.org wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Kevin,
I've just seen a question on using Oxygen icons
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 11:50 PM, Mathieu Tarral
mathieu.tar...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed an issue with the plasmate component, which is build
when you include kf5-workspace-build-include.
It has a build dependency on KDevPlatform, but this component is only
selected in
29 matches
Mail list logo
