Hi!
Nate Graham writes:
> To be honest, I haven’t found Sentry to be that useful in its current
> implementation. The primary issue is that it represents a second source of
> truth
> for where crash reports live. As a result, developers who already struggle to
> notice Bugzilla-based crash
To be honest, I haven't found Sentry to be that useful in its current
implementation. The primary issue is that it represents a second source
of truth for where crash reports live. As a result, developers who
already struggle to notice Bugzilla-based crash reports have to look in
a second
Hey,
We've had almost a year, albeit in a super limited capacity for git
builds, with sentry (https://errors-eval.kde.org) and we should
probably render a final verdict on the evaluation.
Did you like it?
What could be improved?
Should we move ahead with a more permanent setup?
The overall game
