Re: The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-07 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:03 AM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote: El Dijous, 3 de maig de 2012, a les 00:32:37, Vishesh Handa va escriure: Hey everyone! snip The second solution is - * nepomuk-core installs the headers in nepomuk2 * the library already has a different name, so

Re: The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-07 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:01 AM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote: El Dimecres, 2 de maig de 2012, a les 12:14:00, Ivan Cukic va escriure: The first solution - * Remove nepomuk from kdelibs and kde-runtime +1 This is what has been done with kactivities. Instead of having it in

Re: The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-07 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2012-05-07, Vishesh Handa m...@vhanda.in wrote: Right. We could maintain BC and SC by not touching the kdelibs nepomuk, and just making nepomuk-core a dependency of kdelibs. But that would result in both nepomuk-core and kdelibs installing the same headers. what happens if both libraries

Re: The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-07 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk wrote: On 2012-05-07, Vishesh Handa m...@vhanda.in wrote: Right. We could maintain BC and SC by not touching the kdelibs nepomuk, and just making nepomuk-core a dependency of kdelibs. But that would result in both

Re: Pairs going to KDE Edu

2012-05-07 Thread Aleix Pol
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 2:08 AM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote: El Dimarts, 1 de maig de 2012, a les 22:16:44, Aleix Pol va escriure: On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Aleix Pol aleix...@kde.org wrote: On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Yuri Chornoivan yurc...@ukr.net wrote: написане

Re: The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-07 Thread David Faure
On Monday 07 May 2012 13:06:15 Vishesh Handa wrote: On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk wrote: On 2012-05-07, Vishesh Handa m...@vhanda.in wrote: Right. We could maintain BC and SC by not touching the kdelibs nepomuk, and just making nepomuk-core a

Re: Review Request: Avoid using QDialog::exec in kpasswdserver to address long standing issue

2012-05-07 Thread David Faure
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104817/#review13526 --- Smart pointers without a purpose, just make reading the code

Re: The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-07 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Sebastian Trüg tr...@kde.org wrote: On 05/07/2012 12:09 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: So, we're down to 3 options - *1.* nepomuk-core become a dependency of kdelibs. Kdelibs is not touched. *Problem:* Overlapping headers and possible mysterious crashes if

Re: The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-07 Thread Sebastian Trüg
On 05/07/2012 02:35 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Sebastian Trüg tr...@kde.org mailto:tr...@kde.org wrote: On 05/07/2012 12:09 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: So, we're down to 3 options - *1.* nepomuk-core become a dependency of kdelibs.

Re: The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-07 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Sebastian Trüg tr...@kde.org wrote: On 05/07/2012 02:35 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Sebastian Trüg tr...@kde.org mailto:tr...@kde.org wrote: On 05/07/2012 12:09 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: So, we're down to 3

Re: The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-07 Thread Sebastian Trüg
On 05/07/2012 03:47 PM, ivan.cu...@gmail.com wrote: Maybe there could be something like qt has - BEGIN_NEPOMUK_NAMESPACE... So that if the same needs to be done in the future, we could just change the macro value. That would be much more work since each cpp file has the namespaces in the

Re: The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-07 Thread ivan . cukic
Maybe there could be something like qt has - BEGIN_NEPOMUK_NAMESPACE... So that if the same needs to be done in the future, we could just change the macro value. I don't know, thinking that Nepomuk2 namespace is looking rather ugly :) The dirtiest solution library-wise would be to have

Re: Review Request: KMessageWidget: Adapt height to text changes

2012-05-07 Thread Aurélien Gâteau
On May 2, 2011, 5:49 p.m., Aurélien Gâteau wrote: Thanks for the patch Mattias! This is indeed an annoying bug but your fix does not work when the widget is resized. heightForWidth() needs to be implemented I think. Matthias Fuchs wrote: The problem is that resizing takes no

Package Dependcies List on Techbase

2012-05-07 Thread Allen Winter
Howdy, I started putting the list of package dependences (arranged by module) onto Techbase. http://techbase.kde.org/Getting_Started/Build/Requirements The tables on the subpages there are generated by a perl program I wrote. That program reads the CMakeLists.txt files inside a module and

Re: The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-07 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dilluns, 7 de maig de 2012, a les 11:48:00, Vishesh Handa va escriure: On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:03 AM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote: El Dijous, 3 de maig de 2012, a les 00:32:37, Vishesh Handa va escriure: Hey everyone! snip The second solution is - *

Re: The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-07 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote: El Dilluns, 7 de maig de 2012, a les 11:48:00, Vishesh Handa va escriure: On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:03 AM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote: El Dijous, 3 de maig de 2012, a les 00:32:37, Vishesh Handa va escriure:

Re: The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-07 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk wrote: On 2012-05-07, Vishesh Handa m...@vhanda.in wrote: I'm not okay with applications having to stick with the old faulty APIs I'm not okay with a api or abi break in kdelibs. Of course. But that is not what is happening.

Re: The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-07 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Monday, 2012-05-07, Vishesh Handa wrote: On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote: So you mean yes, they can, they do now and can still do it, even if using the old APIs are suboptimal. Right? I'm sorry. What? I think what Albert is asking is

Re: The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-07 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Kevin Krammer kram...@kde.org wrote: On Monday, 2012-05-07, Vishesh Handa wrote: On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote: So you mean yes, they can, they do now and can still do it, even if using the old APIs are

Re: The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-07 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dilluns, 7 de maig de 2012, a les 22:09:01, Vishesh Handa va escriure: On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote: El Dilluns, 7 de maig de 2012, a les 11:48:00, Vishesh Handa va escriure: On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:03 AM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:

Re: The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-07 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:57 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote: There's some problem of communication here. Let me try to explain myself better. As far as I understand: * Dolphin uses the old api at the moment and works fine Yup. * When the change you propose (adding new apis),

Re: The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-07 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Monday 07 May 2012, Vishesh Handa wrote: ... So, we're down to 3 options - *1.* nepomuk-core become a dependency of kdelibs. Kdelibs is not touched. *Problem:* Overlapping headers and possible mysterious crashes if both libraries are loaded. *2.* nepomuk-core installs headers under

Re: TechBase git policies, infrastructure documentation, please

2012-05-07 Thread Stephen Kelly
Alexander Neundorf wrote: It would be just *great* if you could put this on techbase.kde.org :-) I'd suggest you just copy it into wherever you would look for it. Mostly it's not kde specific anyway. It's just about knowing how to use git. Thanks, Steve.