---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104983/
---
(Updated May 22, 2012, 7:14 p.m.)
Review request for kdelibs.
Changes
Hi!
This issue has been fixed some time ago.
Thanks for the hint! :)
Matthias
2012/5/23 Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org:
El Dilluns, 21 de maig de 2012, a les 18:31:25, Daniel Nicoletti va escriure:
Hi,
Apper is on playground probably since 2008,
it's widely used nowadays so it doesn't
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104982/#review14079
---
Ship it!
I'm ok with the change, but it seems this area is
Hi,
Here's a braindump of the ones I know.
On Tuesday, May 22, 2012 09:48:49 Myriam Schweingruber wrote:
akademy-sponsoring
Private since financial data / sponsoring is being discussed.
akademy-talks
Discussions among the programme committee are traditionally private among that
committee.
On April 26, 2012, 5:09 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
If i understand you correctly you are suggesting to create a bug (option
that does nothing)?
Doesn't make much sense.
Dawit Alemayehu wrote:
Huh ? I do not follow. By option that does nothing you mean this change
by
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104973/#review14082
---
Does this have unit tests? Would make sense to add a new one
On May 23, 2012, 1:06 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Does this have unit tests? Would make sense to add a new one forcing this
behaviour? What about docs? Should any doc be fixed/improved mentioning the
behaviour?
There is no test at the moment for the RunnerManager class. Docs does
On April 26, 2012, 5:09 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
If i understand you correctly you are suggesting to create a bug (option
that does nothing)?
Doesn't make much sense.
Dawit Alemayehu wrote:
Huh ? I do not follow. By option that does nothing you mean this change
by
On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 16:07:48 Myriam Schweingruber wrote:
So IMHO these lists should be visible in the mailiman/listinfo, with a
description. There already is a lot of criticism about hidden mailing
lists with unknown agendas among the KDE community, a minimum of
transparency about what
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org wrote:
On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 16:07:48 Myriam Schweingruber wrote:
So IMHO these lists should be visible in the mailiman/listinfo, with a
description. There already is a lot of criticism about hidden mailing
lists with unknown
El Dimecres, 23 de maig de 2012, a les 13:58:27, Matthias Klumpp va escriure:
Hi!
This issue has been fixed some time ago.
I can't find where the apper catalog loaded in AppSetup, can you point me to
it?
Cheers,
Albert
Thanks for the hint! :)
Matthias
2012/5/23 Albert Astals Cid
Am Montag, 21. Mai 2012, 23:31:25 schrieb Daniel Nicoletti:
Hi,
Apper is on playground probably since 2008,
it's widely used nowadays so it doesn't make
sense to keep it there anymore.
So please review the code, make suggestions and such...
Right now the code is at (I've asked kde
On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 17:39:52 Myriam Schweingruber wrote:
I am a moderator for several mailing lists, some of these for the fsfe
and those have most likely an equal amount of spam traffic than KDE
lists. Worse even for the 3 mailing lists I moderate in the *ubuntu
space, it sometimes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102523/
---
(Updated May 23, 2012, 3:25 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Runtime and
14 matches
Mail list logo
