On Wednesday, June 6, 2012 20:32:49 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Someone from plasma?
summary: no hard requirement to jump to Qt 4.8 from plasma at this time ...
Qt 4.8 brings a number of speed improvements and general goodness which
certainly helps the various Plasma workspaces, but i do not
Are there any further objections to moving these forward into extragear?
No objections, just a question: How much of this works on Windows ?
Unsure about the call UI, but I presume the logger could at least ?
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
Are there any further objections to moving these forward into extragear?
This is probably not the best way:
https://projects.kde.org/projects/kdereview/ktp-call-ui/repository/revisions/master/entry/libktpcall/CMakeLists.txt#L25
No objections, just a question: How much of this works on Windows ?
Unsure about the call UI, but I presume the logger could at least ?
Last time I tried, I had issues with python3 that the KDE Windows
project had been using. I have mentioned that to George. It would be
nice in the future (so
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105155/
---
(Updated June 7, 2012, 2:44 p.m.)
Review request for kdelibs and Konsole.
El Dijous, 7 de juny de 2012, a les 09:27:22, Aaron J. Seigo va escriure:
On Wednesday, June 6, 2012 20:32:49 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Someone from plasma?
summary: no hard requirement to jump to Qt 4.8 from plasma at this time ...
Qt 4.8 brings a number of speed improvements and general