On Jan. 7, 2014, 5:44 a.m., Àlex Fiestas wrote:
Hey hugo, is this in somehow now that oxygen uses KStyle again?
Hi Alex,
yes this has been removed from Oxygen::pixelMetric
and moved to kstyle::pixelMetric.
However it has the same issue:
case PM_ToolBarIconSize:
return
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114841/#review46960
---
how does that behave with the normal locker (that is no
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114889/#review46964
---
This code was originally like this (more or less), but
On 06/01/14 06:52, Kevin Ottens wrote:
I used to say that the maintenance model of kdelibs was David Faure by
default. It's great to have someone like David around, but at the same time
it's delusional and dangerous to think that he'll always be able to save the
day. This model has to stop
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114889/#review46971
---
src/core/global.cpp
Le mardi 7 janvier 2014 11:36:34 Alex Merry a écrit :
On 06/01/14 06:52, Kevin Ottens wrote:
I used to say that the maintenance model of kdelibs was David Faure by
default. It's great to have someone like David around, but at the same
time it's delusional and dangerous to think that he'll
On Jan. 7, 2014, 8:51 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
how does that behave with the normal locker (that is no screensaver)?
None is not blank - the patch is correct.
If a cursor is specified, it is displayed regardless of what window the pointer
is in. If None is specified, the normal cursor
Hello everyone,
This is the minutes of the Week 48 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on
#kde-devel at 4pm Paris time.
Were present: afiestas, agateau, alexmerry, apol, d_ed, mck182, mgraesslin,
Riddell, sandsmark, sebas, svuorela and myself.
Announcement:
* Happy new year!
* TP1 is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114889/
---
(Updated Jan. 7, 2014, 4:24 p.m.)
Review request for kdelibs.
Changes
On Tuesday 07 January 2014 07:22:01 Kevin Ottens wrote:
On Tuesday 07 January 2014 00:45:19 Christoph Feck wrote:
On Monday 06 January 2014 23:54:46 Kevin Ottens wrote:
On Monday 06 January 2014 22:26:27 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
IMO something like proposing the maintainers and approving
Hello,
As a reminder the maintainers list is available there:
http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/List
People willing to maintain a framework should put their name in the
corresponding column.
On Tuesday 07 January 2014 16:53:30 Kevin Ottens wrote:
* agateau plans to work on kapidox, [...]
On 6 January 2014 07:52, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote:
I urge everyone, and in particular people volunteering to maintain a
framework, to do a pass of review of our code base and APIs to modernize them
when appropriate. It is a very big task, and in no way can be coordinated in
the way
Hello,
I am also looking to maintain a project, if there is something where i can
help. I would try to join the meeting.
Regards,
Siddharth Sharma
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote:
Hello everyone,
This is the minutes of the Week 48 KF5 meeting. As usual
On 07/01/14 16:28, Kevin Ottens wrote:
* alexmerry [...] plans to adopt kimageformats and kmediaplayer;
Alex: Both KImageFormats and KMediaPlayer are your if you adjust the wiki
page
accordingly.
I've also taken KDesignerPlugin; as far as I'm aware, I'm the only
person to have done
On 07/01/14 17:10, John Layt wrote:
I've put myself down (rather obviously) for KPrintUtils. Most of the
dialog code from there has been merged into Qt5.2, or is planned for
Qt 5.3, so needs deleting. I'm also wondering if we still need our
own KPrintPreview dialog, there was a reason in 4.0
El Dimarts, 7 de gener de 2014, a les 17:28:29, Kevin Ottens va escriure:
Hello,
As a reminder the maintainers list is available there:
http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/List
Can I suggest changing Unmaintained to looking for a maintainer?
It looks pretty bad that we released a the
Hello,
On Tuesday 07 January 2014 18:10:10 John Layt wrote:
On 6 January 2014 07:52, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote:
I urge everyone, and in particular people volunteering to maintain a
framework, to do a pass of review of our code base and APIs to modernize
them when appropriate. It is
El Dimarts, 7 de gener de 2014, a les 18:24:41, Alex Merry va escriure:
On 07/01/14 17:10, John Layt wrote:
I've put myself down (rather obviously) for KPrintUtils. Most of the
dialog code from there has been merged into Qt5.2, or is planned for
Qt 5.3, so needs deleting. I'm also
On Jan. 7, 2014, 9:51 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
how does that behave with the normal locker (that is no screensaver)?
Thomas Lübking wrote:
None is not blank - the patch is correct.
If a cursor is specified, it is displayed regardless of what window the
pointer is in.
On 7 January 2014 19:55, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Dimarts, 7 de gener de 2014, a les 18:24:41, Alex Merry va escriure:
On 07/01/14 17:10, John Layt wrote:
I've put myself down (rather obviously) for KPrintUtils. Most of the
dialog code from there has been merged into Qt5.2,
El Dimarts, 7 de gener de 2014, a les 23:10:11, John Layt va escriure:
On 7 January 2014 19:55, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Dimarts, 7 de gener de 2014, a les 18:24:41, Alex Merry va escriure:
On 07/01/14 17:10, John Layt wrote:
I've put myself down (rather obviously) for
On 7 January 2014 19:49, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote:
Most of the
dialog code from there has been merged into Qt5.2, or is planned for
Qt 5.3, so needs deleting. I'm also wondering if we still need our
own KPrintPreview dialog, there was a reason in 4.0 but I can't
remember why now and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114907/
---
Review request for kdelibs and Jeremy Whiting.
Repository: kdelibs
On 07/01/14 22:30, John Layt wrote:
Running through the print dialog features, I'm don't think there is
anything left to be upstreamed. There's a couple of very minor CUPS
features in the dialog that I don't think anyone uses (mirror page,
page border, page label) that I don't really want in
On Tuesday 07 January 2014 23:30:28 John Layt wrote:
On 7 January 2014 19:49, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote:
Most of the
dialog code from there has been merged into Qt5.2, or is planned for
Qt 5.3, so needs deleting. I'm also wondering if we still need our
own KPrintPreview dialog,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114907/#review47019
---
kdeui/fonts/kfontutils.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114841/#review47020
---
Ship it!
If you have the possibility (build setup) please
27 matches
Mail list logo
