On Sunday 31 October 2010 21:39:09 Stefan Majewsky wrote:
Am Sonntag, 31. Oktober 2010, 20:39:30 schrieb John Layt:
I've been away all day and need to catch up on the thread, but just a
heads-up that this has been picked up by the press already and is making
its way around the feeds
On Sunday 31 October 2010 11:33:22 Mark Kretschmann wrote:
Hey all,
after reading the whole thread that started with Chani's mail (why
kdelibs?), I think the noise level has become a bit too much there.
Cornelius had proposed this rather daring idea:
On Monday 01 November 2010 21:25:45 John Layt wrote:
We'd also need to start setting the users envvars on login to the KDE
settings so Gnome apps play nice, but that's a separate issue to be worked
out (or it could be how Qt reads our settings, who knows yet).
Hmmm, the POSIX standard says
On Tuesday 02 November 2010 17:16:43 Chani wrote:
Do we have a wiki page were 'what can be fixed now' and 'what needs
fixing in
KDE5' has been/can be written down? Perhaps a version of
http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/Mobile/PlatformModifications but with
a little more detail?
[Apologies for the cross-post, but I'd like feedback from app developers on
their requirements too, not just core]
Hi,
This weekend the Marble devs are meeting for a sprint, and I'm tagging along
to discuss a few different issues that I'd like peoples feedback and opinions
on.
The big one is
On Thursday 04 November 2010 07:23:38 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
On Wednesday 03 November 2010, John Layt wrote:
* Comes packaged with lots of other services that we don't need, such as
Solid, Phonon and kdepim equivalents.
It is worth to note that QtMobility is very modular, so you get
On Thursday 04 November 2010 18:21:55 John Layt wrote:
I need to investigate what QtMobility does on desktops (Win and Mac too) if
Geoclue isn't available. It looks like the Ovi backend isn't an option due
to the current license. If QtMobility doesn't provide any other backend
on desktop
On Monday 08 November 2010 23:29:13 Stephen Kelly wrote:
It took me a while to figure out that the country must be in lower case.
KLocale de_DE(kwrite, de, DE); // does not work
KLocale de_DE(kwrite, de_DE); // does not work
KLocale de_DE(kwrite, de_DE.UTF-8); // does not work
KLocale
On Wednesday 10 November 2010 14:46:55 Hans Meine wrote:
Op den Dingsdag 09 November 2010 Klock 22:32:52 hett John Layt schreven:
But I can't see any reason why it shouldn't lowercase any given value,
I'll fix that and update the apidox to state it should be lowercase.
Why not give
On Sunday 21 November 2010 00:46:53 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Is there any way i can convince you it's safe enough for KDE 4.6 inclusion?
Albert
+1 from me, if the release team are happy I'm happy, but I see it as more a
bug fix than a new feature anyway.
John.
On Monday 29 November 2010 00:51:29 John Layt wrote:
On Monday 29 November 2010 00:10:59 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
A Dilluns, 29 de novembre de 2010, Christoph Feck va escriure:
Hi,
kdereview contains two new modules, but I did not see the announcement
here. libkmap probably needs
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6014/#review9046
---
Before I get stuck in, three points:
1) Screenshots?
2) API
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6047/
---
Review request for kdelibs.
Summary
---
KLocale can be constructed
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6047/#review9131
---
On 2010-12-05 02:08:07, John Layt wrote
On Tuesday 01 February 2011 17:14:05 Artur de Souza wrote:
Quoting Tom Albers t...@kde.org:
80 kmobiletools
20 kde-embedded
We already have kde-mobile...maybe it's safe to remove these two
mailing lists?
kmobiletools is actually an app for syncing your phone, not part of the
On Tuesday 01 February 2011 13:45:27 George Goldberg wrote:
41 kdelibs-bugs
This is a very useful list for bug triagers - I can volunteer to
moderate it if no-one else is currently doing it.
ditto, if more than 1 or 2 mods are needed.
John.
On Wednesday 02 February 2011 09:19:29 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 01:37:26PM -0800, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
* adapting http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/SVN_Commit_Policy
i'd suggest a look at http://qt.gitorious.org/qt/pages/CommitPolicy, in
particular point 8 of the
On Wednesday 02 February 2011 07:27:01 Dawit A wrote:
Ahh... I see. It is push everything upto that commit, not just push
that commit. Ouch! That is almost as much a hassle as the convoluted
method I am following now. Do not commit anything that is not ready to
be pushed into my own local
On Saturday 12 February 2011 18:53:11 Tom Albers wrote:
Hi,
Is there an agenda for the meeting, or some documentation? If everyone gets
a chance to explain their preferred git workflow and we are going to be a
discussion afterwards and pick one, I bet this is a meeting that will take
On Tuesday 15 February 2011 17:51:35 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
hi all
so after the meeting on Sunday, here is where we are in terms of a draft
workflow. more complete meeting minutes can be seen here:
http://titanpad.com/SnJwFW2iXL
Actually, even more complete minutes, outstanding
On Tuesday 15 February 2011 18:32:29 John Layt wrote:
Actually, even more complete minutes, outstanding issues and action points
can be found at http://community.kde.org/20110213_GitWorkflowAgenda
Following up on my action points for the commit template and config settings.
I've attached
On Wednesday 16 February 2011 12:58:48 John Layt wrote:
I want to make a start on some of the Git recipe and reference
documentation as things occur to me, and was thinking a central
http://techbase.kde.org/Development/Git hub page leading off to the various
tutorial, policy, recipe, sysadmin
On Wednesday 09 March 2011 21:26:26 Wolfgang Rohdewald wrote:
git checkout --track origin/KDE/4.6
git cherry-pick fd16288
When cherry-picking for a back port or forward port, please use the -x option
so that the original commit number is included in the message. This makes it
easier to
On Thursday 10 March 2011 16:11:15 Tom Albers wrote:
- Original Message -
On March 1, 2011, Tom Albers wrote:
Hi,
New month, new list:
Moderation queue top list:
I keep empty the moderation queue on the kde-print and kde-print-devel
lists
but, as I already stated
Hi,
I'll be attending the OpenPrinting Summit [1] to discuss how to complete the
Common Printing Dialog [2] and integrate it into KDE and Qt. I'm looking for
any feedback people may have about the CPD, and any questions you want me to
ask while I'm there.
The CPD is a common print dialog
On Wednesday 16 Mar 2011 23:27:04 Christoph Feck wrote:
Many thanks, John, for never giving up with improved printing in KDE!
Thanks, I may not be the most effective hacker around, but I am persistent :-)
Just to be clear, I'm not saying we will go with the CPD, that's not a
decision I can
On Thursday 17 Mar 2011 06:29:16 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
For what I got out of it, colord seems to be, like so many generic
libraries be focussed on gnome/gtk-first
Aye, there are a lot of those system libraries coming out from Red Hat / Gnome
that give no thought to KDE integration, or even
On Thursday 17 Mar 2011 06:30:50 Kai-Uwe Behrmann wrote:
Am 17.03.11, 00:27 +0100 schrieb Christoph Feck:
Kai-Uwe Behrmann (maintainer of KDE color management applications) can
help you here. Grab him on http://www.oyranos.org/ and make sure he
attends the meeting ;)
It would be really
On Thursday 17 Mar 2011 15:42:23 Kai-Uwe Behrmann wrote:
well, I'd hate to see/implement/support integration code for every
different CMS :-)
At least Oyranos targets verbaly at cross platform, if thats of relevance
for osX and Windows.
The Oyranos library API is basic C. ArgyllCMS
On Thursday 17 Mar 2011 22:40:32 Christoph Feck wrote:
Do you need it in 4.6.2? I can apply to trunk, but I won't touch branches
until my git foo matures :)
Not too much git-foo required to back or forward port as we can't really merge
in kdelibs yet, so we just cherry-pick the commit we need:
Hi,
I was wondering if we need to define a New Dependencies policy, or at least
some guidelines to remind people what to think about when choosing or creating
new dependencies?
Something like:
* All new dependencies must be advised to the kde-build and kde-packager lists
* Any changes to KDE
Hi,
We still have some outstanding issues from the Git Workflow meeting a while
back (see http://community.kde.org/20110213_GitWorkflowAgenda) which I'd like
to see updated.
* Workflow
eean, steveire and PovAddict were to draw up alternative workflow proposals,
steveire has drawn up one at
On Sunday 20 Mar 2011 15:02:49 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Sunday 20 March 2011, Parker Coates wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:09, Andreas Hartmetz wrote:
On Sunday 20 March 2011 14:38:40 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Can you please be careful and do not create incorrectly 4.6 branches
Hi,
Some very good points, some definately belong in the dialog, others belong in
CUPS itself, but I'll take them all with me as everyone will be at the summit.
- My biggest wish for a printing dialog is that the preview exactly matches
the output. All current print dialogs that I know on
On Sunday 20 Mar 2011 16:50:22 todd rme wrote:
In general it would be nice to see screenshots of the available
options and how they are laid out.
-Todd
I'd post some but for two problems. 1) It segfaults on my machine right now,
some Qt issue 2) The ui interaction is really not close to
On Sunday 20 Mar 2011 17:48:09 Christoph Bartoschek wrote:
Hi,
do you refer to the dialog I see for one of our printers? Which options do
you want to see? The General tab?
By the way, is there any reason to prevent resizing of the dialog?
I've disabled this and made 3 screenshots
On Monday 21 Mar 2011 14:19:09 Ian Monroe wrote:
Ben did add this block to his hook. Hooray. :)
Yay, thanks Ben! Mental note to buy Ben yet another beer at Akademy.
I'm thinking I should just go ahead and rename KDE/4.6 to 4.6 etc.
Do we know what the consequences are? Does this damage the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100920/#review2106
---
My thoughts are if the anonymous tickbox is first focus it
On March 22, 2011, 6:23 p.m., John Layt wrote:
My thoughts are if the anonymous tickbox is first focus it should be above
the username/password fields and the username/password fields should be
disabled if anonymous is selected. But that may look a little weird with
the text
On March 22, 2011, 6:23 p.m., John Layt wrote:
My thoughts are if the anonymous tickbox is first focus it should be above
the username/password fields and the username/password fields should be
disabled if anonymous is selected. But that may look a little weird with
the text
On Saturday 16 Apr 2011 20:32:59 Hans Linkels wrote:
Hello,
Since 2010-10-10 the country Netherlands Antilles doesn't exist anymore.
Instead it became two countries (Curacao and St Martin) and a couple of
Dutch municipalities which belong to the Netherlands but have their own
ccTLD (.BQ).
Hi,
Did anything come out from discussions on feature branch naming in git? With
GSoC starting soon we'll be getting a lot of new feature branches and it would
be nice if they were consistantly named to make them easy to find and manage.
See
On Tuesday 26 Apr 2011 16:18:22 Harald Sitter wrote:
On Tuesday 26 April 2011 15:52:18 John Layt wrote:
I'd prefer to see the gsoc branches under a common prefix in the main
project repo rather than as personal branches or repos:
origin/gsoc2011/subproject/branchname
e.g
On Tuesday 26 Apr 2011 17:37:47 Torgny Nyblom wrote:
Why this long name with multiple namespaces, the branches should be deleted
once merged so we won't have a collection of old soc branches around for
long?
/Regards
Torgny
Well it's based on the original naming proposal to try keep things
On Wednesday 27 Apr 2011 19:59:05 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
I mean, I can help with simple things.
If we agree that the following pages should be gone
http://techbase.kde.org/Development/Tutorials/Git
http://techbase.kde.org/Development/Tutorials/Git/Pushing
Hi,
I'm implementing support for US week numbers, but there's conflicting
information on the great interweb tubes as to what the standard is.
Some sources say the US Standard is Week 1 is from Jan 1 to the first Saturday
of the year (which may be less than 7 days) then each following week
On Wednesday 04 May 2011 23:07:38 Keith Rusler wrote:
A new week starts every Sunday. So yeah, week one starts on the first
Sunday of the year, regardly of wherever January 1st
starts on. Btw, we aren't called USians, but Americans ;).
So consensus seems to be Week 1 starts on the first
On Friday 06 May 2011 03:48:30 Gary Greene wrote:
On 5 May 2011, at 12:24 AM, John Layt wrote:
So consensus seems to be Week 1 starts on the first Sunday, the question
then is what week number do the days before that receive, Week 0 or Week
52/53 of the previous year?
Normally, that's
On Monday 09 May 2011 14:03:47 Ivan Čukić wrote:
Another topic for Platform 11 - Moving stuff from libkonq to kdelibs?
It has a quite significant number of users.
Cheerio
Exactly what I was about to suggest! I've added it to
http://community.kde.org/KDE_Core/Platform_11#Topics, feel free
On Monday 09 May 2011 17:03:18 Olivier Goffart wrote:
With Qt5 around the corner[1], I think it is time to start thinking about
KDE5
TBH, we'd be fools to release a KDE 5.0 based on Qt 5.0 shortly after it's
release. The sensible approach is to wait for Qt 5.1 and release KDE 5.0
after that.
On Tuesday 10 May 2011 23:39:37 Dawit A wrote:
I will
try to inform the translators by marking my commits with GUI: and
also sending a message about the changes to the appropriate list.
Once the soft freeze arrives you must first get permission from the kde-i18n-
doc mailing list _before_ you
On Sunday 15 May 2011 16:54:31 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
I thought the ability to have better workflows with git was one of the
motivations for the move to git.
Why aren't these better workflows documented or recommended anywhere ?
There's a suggested workflow for kde-workspace at
On Wednesday 18 May 2011 12:06:18 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
i don't want to start this discussion here on this mailing list as i doubt
it will result in anything useful, given the constraints on bandwidth and
opportunity to easily diverge into a thousand sub-topics. let's ensure
this gets
Hi,
KCalendarSystem is a public class with many virtual methods which are
reimplemented in derived classes such as KCalendarSystemGregorian. The
derived classes are not exported or part of the api, only KCalendarSystem is
exposed, but the derived classes are created and returned in a static
On 6 June 2011 23:36, Scott Kitterman k...@kitterman.com wrote:
I get we need to modularize for a number of important reasons, but I don't
see
the companion story for how this all gets released as something coherent
and
functional.
Where's that part of the story?
Scott K
From Sebas'
On Tuesday 07 Jun 2011 00:38:58 Kevin Ottens wrote:
Right, however there's also a plan ATM to get the settings between KLocale
and QLocale shared. John is working on that right now, so it depends a bit
on the outcome, in any cases the situation is likely to improve on that
particular point.
On Tuesday 07 Jun 2011 10:51:29 Manuel Sput Nickschas wrote:
On Tuesday 07 June 2011 08:46:54 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
This means that if you want Tier 1 frameworks to be translatable you need
either to teach Qt to understand gettext files natively or to make Tier 1
frameworks use pure
On Tuesday 07 Jun 2011 18:57:22 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
A Tuesday, June 07, 2011, John Layt va escriure:
We discussed translation briefly at Platform 11 and Qt moving to or
supporting .po is something we really want to push for at QCS. I really
hope we have some people knowledgable about
On Wednesday 08 Jun 2011 19:48:30 Mark wrote:
Just a comment that might be of interest to some (just found this link):
http://code.google.com/p/simple-gettext/
It also has a Qt wrapper..
Interesting, but not very active, GPL3 so not something that could be used in
library code, and lacking
On Thursday 09 Jun 2011 15:31:42 John Layt wrote:
We would like to co-ordinate our efforts at QtCS to ensure the best
possible outcome for KDE and Qt. To help this we would like all KDE
community members attending to list their name on the KDE at QtCS wiki
page [2]. Please indicate if you
On Thursday 09 Jun 2011 17:34:57 Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
On Thursday 09 June 2011 Torgny Nyblom wrote:
This part I fully agree with, however later in the example section it
seems like rebasing should be done prior to review. Is the examples
correct?
The examples need some reality
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101575/
---
Review request for kdelibs, KDEPIM, KPhotoAlbum, Skrooge, Zanshin, Kevin
On Thursday 09 Jun 2011 15:31:42 John Layt wrote:
We would like to co-ordinate our efforts at QtCS to ensure the best
possible outcome for KDE and Qt. To help this we would like all KDE
community members attending to list their name on the KDE at QtCS wiki
page.
Q - 3 and counting
On Monday 13 Jun 2011 18:02:14 John Layt wrote:
The wiki now has 20 names on it (with some obvious ommissions), about 10 of
whom can attend dinner or drinks Wednesday evening, so we will try book
somewhere and confirm it here and on the wiki. RMS is apparently giving a
talk somewhere
On Tuesday 28 Jun 2011 17:27:35 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Monday, June 27, 2011 22:18:08 Ingo Klöcker wrote:
Localization is not only about user visible texts, It is also about
kconfig having per language keys, it is about kstandarddirs::locate
being able to find localized icons, etc.
Hi,
OpenPrinting (a Linux Foundation project) has been working for a number of
years to implement the Common Print Dialog [1], a shared print dialog design
and implementation for all Linux desktops. They have now secured some
government funding to complete a Qt version of the dialog in
On Wednesday 29 Jun 2011 14:56:27 Markus Slopianka wrote:
I thought GNOME/GTK already rejected Common Print Dialog, therefore
rendering it effectively dead. (Nothing Common if only KDE adopts it.)
Last I heard Gnome had expressed reservations about its appearance breaking
their HIG and so they
Hi,
This is the second email in the series of three looking at KLocale in
Frameworks 5. This email covers Date/Time, so I have also cc'ed the PIM
mailing list for their input.
As with QLocale, the lack of features in QDateTime has forced KDE to create
our own solutions such as KDateTime,
Hi,
This is the third email in the series of three looking at KLocale in
Frameworks 5. This email covers Translation. This is a repost of a mail to
the Qt5 list with added context for KDE.
This email is a summary of the session on Translation held at the Qt
Contributors summit. The session
On Thursday 30 Jun 2011 23:42:42 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
A Thursday, June 30, 2011, John Layt va escriure:
Hi,
At QtCS we had a follow-up session from Platform 11 to discuss what
technical changes we'd like to see in Qt5.
The legal aspects of copying code from KDE was discussed
FYI.
This is something we should try get people to, not just for the desktop stream
but also to build relationships with the stacks that we often seem to have so
little influence with.
John.
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Call for desktop/graphics/mobile tracks for Linux
On Tuesday 19 July 2011 16:01:06 Stefan Majewsky wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:22 PM, David nonot...@gmail.com wrote:
(rational: There is no kde-jobs list yet.)
@sysadmin: Could you create one?
Greetings
Stefan
Given the very low volume I don't think that is necessary, a qt-jobs
On Wednesday 27 Jul 2011 14:40:11 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
i'm VERY interested in what you are hoping and planning for from your own
attendance at BDS. please share those goals so that we can all arrive more
mentally prepared for what is in store.
1) Catch up on everything I'm behind on due to
On Sunday 31 Jul 2011 02:01:57 Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
Alex Fiestas wrote:
· Draft a plan for colord integration (next thing after krandr is fixed)
That better be optional at runtime :) There aren't that many people who
care about color profiles (but we really need the functionality for
On Thursday 28 Jul 2011 15:25:38 Laszlo Papp wrote:
...
* KJob - Qt-Addon for 5.1
Is the lack of manpower the reason or something else it is not planned
against 5.0 ? I have made some simple modifications in our project
where it is now KDE dependency free.
Partly manpower, but mainly
On Tuesday 16 Aug 2011 15:55:57 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 03:40:22PM +0200, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
A Dimarts, 16 d'agost de 2011, Oswald Buddenhagen vàreu escriure:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:59:18AM +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote:
In my opinion, kdeinit should
On Friday 19 Aug 2011 19:54:21 Harald Sitter wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Lukas Appelhans l.appelh...@gmx.de wrote:
I guess there were no efforts yet from the kdemultimedia team to make the
move.
I did not realize we had to take care of the move seems a bit
inconvenient.
On Saturday 20 Aug 2011 13:11:32 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 12:20:55PM +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote:
It needs a global spec too, since global shortcut grabbing with X11 libs
only is sorely lacking. I think the solution we made for KDE 4 is
actually quite good. Anyone
On Saturday 20 Aug 2011 10:14:20 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 08:00:19PM +0100, John Layt wrote:
I've certainly seen him state that he doesn't care about KDE, that we are
irrelevent to anything he does, and he sees no reason to collaborate on
anything with us
On Tuesday 06 Sep 2011 23:14:03 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
A Dimarts, 6 de setembre de 2011, Stephen Kelly vàreu escriure:
I want to know what people expect in terms of source
compatibility and what people are willing to accept. At the moment I
don't know those things.
To be honest,
., John Layt wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101575/
---
(Updated June 10, 2011, 9:18 p.m.)
Review
, perhaps section or category
or something similar would be better. Thanks for doing this! John.
- John Layt
On Oct. 23, 2011, 10:36 a.m., David Edmundson wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http
On Oct. 23, 2011, 5:49 p.m., John Layt wrote:
Hi Dave, as maintainer of the Locale KCM I'm happy for this to go in, but
we do need to make the command line option consistent for all the KCM's. I
suggest checking with Ben Cooksley who is overall maintainer of System
Settings
On 22 Feb 2012 11:29, Boudewijn Rempt b...@valdyas.org wrote:
On Wednesday 22 February 2012 Feb, Nuno Pinheiro wrote:
A Quarta, 22 de Fevereiro de 2012 10:46:53 Richard Hughes você escreveu:
First, I apologise about the cross posting. Please drop any list which
isn't relevant in your
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104198/#review11343
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- John Layt
On March 8, 2012, 11:04 p.m
On Wednesday 14 Mar 2012 21:00:32 Lydia Pintscher wrote:
Heya folks,
Is anyone taking care of KDE's presence at the next Qt Contributors'
Summit? http://wiki.qt-project.org/Events/Qt_Contributors_Summit If
not it'd be really great if someone could step up. We should show up
again. I don't
On Wednesday 14 Mar 2012 15:54:54 Matthias Klumpp wrote:
Hi!
Colord - just to mention that - is also not a GNOME project, it's a
FreeDesktop project. (Doesn't mean it's standard, but does mean that
it's not GNOME) So everyone is free to contribute to it, and the
maintainer is interested in
On Wednesday 14 Mar 2012 04:36:12 Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
Request:
After working on KolorManager and Oyranos in the past months for the last
Oyranos-0.4.0 release, we feel the stack is ready to review for inclusion
into KDE.
KolorManager resides currently in Playground/Graphics:
On Saturday 10 Mar 2012 01:15:03 Mark wrote:
Hi,
Disclaimer: This is just an idea. I don't have plans to make this and i
sadly lack the time to even implement it. However, someone might be
interested to mentor this and someone else might be interested to do this
as a GSoC project. Provided
On Sunday 29 Apr 2012 13:11:19 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to look how our current branching, committing etc. git polices are.
So I went to techbase.kde.org - Development - git.
Nothing at all about git policies:
http://techbase.kde.org/Development/Git#KDE_Git_Policies
Ah,
On Saturday 26 May 2012 00:47:04 Dan Vratil wrote:
Hi,
LibKGoogle is a new optional dependency of kdepim-runtime. It's used by the
new Akonadi Google resources.
It's now in kdereview [0] and I'd like to move it to extragear, so I'm
asking for a review on the library.
Thanks
Dan
On 6 June 2012 02:19, Dawit A ada...@kde.org wrote:
It is a simple matter to put a #ifdef around the code that does not compile
with Qt 4.7. I wish this issue was raised when the code was up for review
for more than a month or the Qt documentation mentioned something about
those functions only
Hi,
We have the Qt Contributors Summit coming next week and I thought we might
want to try co-ordinate our efforts there like we did last year.
I've created a new page at http://community.kde.org/KDE_at_QCS/QCS_2012 for
KDE attendees to put down their details and any issues they want to see
Hi,
I just want to give some rough notes on a couple of the sessions I
attended at QtCS and my impressions on some of the discussions. See
the Qt development mailing list for more detailed minutes from most
sessions.
Locale:
---
Minutes posted to list.
* ICU will become the Locale backend
On 27 October 2012 17:58, Rolf Eike Beer k...@opensource.sf-tec.de wrote:
Am Samstag, 27. Oktober 2012, 11:00:42 schrieb Martin Klapetek:
Hi,
I'd like to move libkfacebook, the foundation for akonadi-facebook
resource, into extragear. It's been in use for a while, lots of distro ship
it
On 30 Oct 2012 11:23, David Jarvie djar...@kde.org wrote:
On Tue, October 30, 2012 11:16 am, David Faure wrote:
On Sunday 28 October 2012 09:16:56 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Ok, thanks.
Is this documented somewhere ?
No (I described it in an email some time ago, but it's not on any
Hi,
A couple of months ago I attended the Linux Color Management Hackfest mainly
to find out how to color manage printing, but also to get a wider overview,
and to figure out the colord versus Oyranos situation. I've been sitting on
this email for a bit as it's probably going to be
mailing list first.
- John Layt
On April 1, 2013, 5:47 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109814
[Apologies for cross-posting, please reply to kde-core-devel]
Hi,
At QtCS Torsten and I attended the QtLocation session to discuss the
future of the module. QtLocation was originally part of QtMobility
for Qt4 and was planned to be part of QtEssentials in Qt5, but it was
dropped from Qt5.0 due
Hi,
Qt Dev Days Europe is coming up on October 7-9 and once again this
year KDE e.V. is partnering with Digia, KDAB and ICS in the running of
the event. In particular KDE is once again helping organise a Qt
Contributors Day on Monday October 7th. We have been allocated a room
for the day to
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
