affecting the code.
I could push my latest changes which allows to easily use a cmake
switch to generate updated ontology classes.
This would combine both solutions, as long as it is fine to add such
generated classes into the repo.
Cheers,
Joerg
--
Vishesh Handa
where possible.
Not sure you want links to the code... but right now there isn't much more
(like per-framework web space and general information...)
--
David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr
Working on KDE, in particular KDE Frameworks 5
--
Vishesh Handa
://projects.kde.org/projects/kdesupport/strigi/libstreamanalyzer
--
Anders
--
Vishesh Handa
, and then commit to master?
- Vishesh Handa
On May 23, 2012, 3:25 p.m., Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102523
2.8?
It will :)
-Todd
--
Vishesh Handa
On May 27, 2012, 1:53 p.m., Vishesh Handa wrote:
nepomuk/kcm/statuswidget.cpp, line 185
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102523/diff/2/?file=65254#file65254line185
Commit these icon changes in a separate patch. (No need to open a
review request)
ping? Any updates
which is the kdelibs one. I just pasted the wrong hash.
--
Vishesh Handa
to be generated.
Will
--
Vishesh Handa
days
without a
crash, without problems.
We do as suggested over here.
Is it possible, to release soprano-2.7.6.1 or so, that ships with
Soprano::Socket? This would make it possible for distributions to ship a
working kde-4.8.4 with only stable software.
--
Vishesh Handa
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk wrote:
On 2012-06-12, Vishesh Handa m...@vhanda.in wrote:
--bcaec554d60626569204c246cba9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Yeah. So Nepomuk is the cause of the problems -
Here our our options -
1. I revert
://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102523/#comment11225
Commit these icon changes in a separate patch. (No need to open a review
request)
- Vishesh Handa
On May 23, 2012, 3:25 p.m., Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
---
This is an automatically
On May 27, 2012, 1:53 p.m., Vishesh Handa wrote:
Pretty cool!
Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
I will delay pushing this as there are currently some things not working
quite out (see
https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kde-runtime/repository/revisions
. by installing D-Bus introspection XML files, that should
be
fine.
Cheers,
Kevin
On 05/17/2012 09:19 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2012-05-17, Vishesh Handa m...@vhanda.in wrote:
@Packagers: We will not be maintaining binary compatibility in
nepomuk-core. At least not for KDE 4.10. We still
as it is there in nepomuk-core.
If you have the time to port some of the stuff to Nepomuk2 it would be
nice, otherwise I'll take care of all of it tomorrow.
Good Night
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Vishesh Handa m...@vhanda.in wrote:
Does anyone have suggestions on where nepomuk-kde-kio and
nepomuk-kde
=summary
[3]
http://quickgit.kde.org/index.php?p=scratch%2Ftrueg%2Fnepomuk-kde-config.gita=summary
[4] http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-develm=133598550318533w=2
--
Vishesh Handa
Forgot to add the correct kde-packagers email.
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Vishesh Handa m...@vhanda.in wrote:
Hey
I just thought everyone should know what's going on with Nepomuk.
As per 4.9, we are going to have 3 repositories -
* nepomuk-core [1]
* nepomuk-kde-kio [2]
* nepomuk
/Sune
On 05/17/2012 09:19 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2012-05-17, Vishesh Handa m...@vhanda.in wrote:
@Packagers: We will not be maintaining binary compatibility in
nepomuk-core. At least not for KDE 4.10. We still need to break a lot
of
things.
NACK.
this is a completely no go
namespace NepomukCore;
Sorry for being a bit vague, I'm writing from my phone.
Cheerio,
IvanOn 7.5.12. 14.49 Vishesh Handa wrote:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Sebastian Trüg tr...@kde.org wrote:
On 05/07/2012 02:35 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:54 PM
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Sebastian Trüg tr...@kde.org wrote:
On 05/16/2012 08:23 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
What about kdelibs/nepomuk/utils/* and the other ui stuff?
Or since those are just APIs they can wait.
I say let's postpone them, they are still in kdelibs.
The facets
PM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Sebastian Trüg tr...@kde.org
mailto:tr...@kde.org wrote:
On 05/16/2012 08:23 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
What about kdelibs/nepomuk/utils/* and the other ui stuff?
Or since those are just APIs they can wait
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Sebastian Trüg tr...@kde.org wrote:
On 05/16/2012 09:16 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Sebastian Trüg tr...@kde.org
mailto:tr...@kde.org wrote:
Pushed my stuff to branch feature/nepomuk2Includes.
Feel free
The old APIs will continue to work exactly the way they work right now.
--
Vishesh Handa
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:03 AM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Dijous, 3 de maig de 2012, a les 00:32:37, Vishesh Handa va escriure:
Hey everyone!
snip
The second solution is -
* nepomuk-core installs the headers in nepomuk2
* the library already has a different name, so
://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdelibs/nepomuk-core
[2]
http://trueg.wordpress.com/2011/06/08/nepomuk-2-0-and-the-data-management-
se rvice/
--
Vishesh Handa
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk wrote:
On 2012-05-07, Vishesh Handa m...@vhanda.in wrote:
Right.
We could maintain BC and SC by not touching the kdelibs nepomuk, and just
making nepomuk-core a dependency of kdelibs. But that would result in
both
nepomuk
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Sebastian Trüg tr...@kde.org wrote:
On 05/07/2012 12:09 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
So, we're down to 3 options -
*1.* nepomuk-core become a dependency of kdelibs. Kdelibs is not touched.
*Problem:* Overlapping headers and possible mysterious crashes
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Sebastian Trüg tr...@kde.org wrote:
On 05/07/2012 02:35 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Sebastian Trüg tr...@kde.org
mailto:tr...@kde.org wrote:
On 05/07/2012 12:09 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
So, we're down to 3
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Dilluns, 7 de maig de 2012, a les 11:48:00, Vishesh Handa va escriure:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:03 AM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Dijous, 3 de maig de 2012, a les 00:32:37, Vishesh Handa va
escriure
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk wrote:
On 2012-05-07, Vishesh Handa m...@vhanda.in wrote:
I'm not okay with applications having to stick with the old faulty APIs
I'm not okay with a api or abi break in kdelibs.
Of course. But that is not what is happening
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Kevin Krammer kram...@kde.org wrote:
On Monday, 2012-05-07, Vishesh Handa wrote:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
So you mean yes, they can, they do now and can still do it, even if
using
the
old APIs
now.
Cheers,
Albert
--
Vishesh Handa
I just noticed that this discussion is no longer cced to kcd.
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Christian Mollekopf chrig...@fastmail.fmwrote:
On Thu, May 3, 2012, at 02:22 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:09 AM, Christian Mollekopf chrig...@fastmail.fm
wrote
/nepomuk-core
[2]
http://trueg.wordpress.com/2011/06/08/nepomuk-2-0-and-the-data-management-service/
--
Vishesh Handa
for unfinished jobs
Please advise.
Thanks
David
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Anne-Marie Mahfouf
annemarie.mahf...@free.fr wrote:
On 03/04/2012 09:41 AM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 10:23 PM, David Boosalis david.boosa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thank you
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:42 PM, Vishesh Handa m...@vhanda.in wrote:
You need to update SDO, and then update kdelibs.
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 6:20 AM, David Boosalis
david.boosa...@gmail.comwrote:
Sorry if this is the wrong group to ask this question, please refer me
to the right group
You need to update SDO, and then update kdelibs.
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 6:20 AM, David Boosalis david.boosa...@gmail.comwrote:
Sorry if this is the wrong group to ask this question, please refer me to
the right group if you know.
The issue is kde-runtime from master. I've been getting the
to me, but
then I'm one the people who designed it! :)
Regards
--
Vishesh Handa
and the new stuff from
libnepomuk2 and the only thing we need to ensure is that the 4.7 libs
still work with the services from nepomuk-core. Applications are then
advised to already depend on nepomuk-core instead of kdelibs.
Opinions?
Cheers,
Sebastian
--
Vishesh Handa
.
Cheers,
Sebastian
[1]
http://community.kde.org/Projects/Nepomuk/Irc_meeting_nepomuk_frameworks
___
Nepomuk mailing list
nepo...@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
--
Vishesh Handa
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102523/#review6254
---
Seems fine to me. I just need to apply the patch to see how it
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102283/
---
(Updated Aug. 10, 2011, 2:15 p.m.)
Review request for kdelibs, Nepomuk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102283/
---
(Updated Aug. 10, 2011, 3:22 p.m.)
Review request for kdelibs, Nepomuk
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/
--
Vishesh Handa
101 - 143 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
