On Monday 14 July 2014 21.01.41 Torgny Nyblom wrote:
Sure. First thing tomorrow.
baloo is now respun.
commit 918ec9d265c315bed4313963c3be58fd748fe26a
sha256: c7467bf518dc23e319b581dbc1dff84cd8d0b03516a1d25bde0aa0cd7bbad043
/Regards
Torgny
/Cheers
Torgny
div Original message
coordination release-t...@kde.org,kdelibs
kde-core-devel@kde.org,torgny nyblom nyb...@kde.org /divdivSubject: Re:
4.13.3 tarballs are available for packagers /divdiv
/divEl Diumenge, 13 de juliol de 2014, a les 23:52:21, Vishesh Handa va
escriure:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa
On Saturday 23 November 2013 17.58.31 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Hi,
for very happy personal reasons (since Tuesday, named David :-) ) I'll have
significantly less time for KDE in the future.
From one who know what it's like, your life will never be the same :)
Congratulations!!
/Torgny
Hi,
What is the policy of depending on unreleased libraries? And is that written
down somewhere?
Reason I'm asking is this commit
http://build.kde.org/view/FAILED/job/libkdcraw_master/83/changes#detail1
It introduces a dependency to libraw 0.16 witch is not released.
/Regards
Torgny
On Friday 26 July 2013 23.53.07 Michael Pyne wrote:
On Fri, July 26, 2013 21:11:21 Torgny Nyblom wrote:
On Thursday 25 July 2013 18.24.50 Michael Pyne wrote:
The 'logical module groups' might play a role in the release process
after
a release is done, but shouldn't have any further
On Thursday 25 July 2013 18.24.50 Michael Pyne wrote:
On Thu, July 25, 2013 22:44:47 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dimecres, 24 de juliol de 2013, a les 23:05:55, Michael Pyne va
escriure:
On Fri, July 19, 2013 00:21:21 you wrote:
After more live discussion with Sebas and Marco plus Aaron
(Missed k-c-d)
On Monday 18 June 2012 19.08.33 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dilluns, 18 de juny de 2012, a les 06:36:33, Martin Gräßlin va escriure:
On Monday 18 June 2012 00:26:13 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
My concerns:
* Need more people to do the tarball packaging/releasing (since if you
://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103148/diff/diff
Testing
---
Builds ok
Thanks,
Torgny Nyblom
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 21.11.03 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 20:12:39 Torgny Nyblom wrote:
[...]
But you also said that the screensaver without locking was going away in
4.9. This is what I'm against.
As Thomas wrote you will always be able to run any animations you
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 20.54.42 Thomas Lübking wrote:
Am Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:02:32 +0200
schrieb Torgny Nyblom nyb...@kde.org:
Screensaver is bling only
No, screensaver hacks are bling only, a screensaver is a
software relic.
(Semantics)
The key aspect is when and why is there eye
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 15.55.15 you wrote:
Am Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:33:39 +0200
schrieb Torgny Nyblom nyb...@kde.org:
Does this mean that I will be focred to use a screensaver with
password unlock? If so why is that not a vaild usecase? It's what I
use at home all the time.
Why
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 19.52.36 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 18:02:32 Torgny Nyblom wrote:
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 15.55.15 you wrote:
Am Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:33:39 +0200
schrieb Torgny Nyblom nyb...@kde.org:
Does this mean that I will be focred to use
.
Also please do not remove the possibility to change how a certain state should
look like. So far I've always changed the on battery profile.
/Regards
Torgny Nyblom
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
of creating NEW profiles will be removed. Profile switching
upon battery events will still be retained and will be looking exactly as
it looks today.
Ok, so the possibility of changing settings of the preset profiles will stay?
--
/Regards
Torgny Nyblom
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On Thursday 08 September 2011 20.37.59 Jeremy Whiting wrote:
Hello all,
Sorry for the cross post, but this concerns many and I want to make
sure everyone is aware.
[...]
Thus I propose we agree to use KDE/X.Y for official kde release branches
going forward. In one week (Sep 15th) perform
On Friday 16 September 2011 15.09.49 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
[...]
Please update the stable i18n branch settings in projects.kde.org
Done, sorry for forgetting that.
/Torgny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 08:15:50 +0200, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Monday, August 22, 2011 11:33:49 Jeremy Whiting wrote:
Was this decided upon at some point? I got conflicting stories
fromsysadmin
and other developers. Yesterday after migrating kdeaccessibilityto
git I
was asked by a sysadmin to
On Friday 19 August 2011 20.54.21 Harald Sitter wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Lukas Appelhans l.appelh...@gmx.de wrote:
I guess there were no efforts yet from the kdemultimedia team to make the
move.
I did not realize we had to take care of the move seems a bit
inconvenient.
On Monday 15 August 2011 23.31.26 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
[...]
-
8) Testing
-
We shortly discussed testing, continuous builds and nightly builds.
I hope Volker (or somebody) can write a better summary.
On Tuesday 16 August 2011 19.48.39 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
[...]
There are currently several parties interested in running builds/test.
There is you working on Jenkins, Volker is working on setting up virtual
machines so users can do builds in a seti@home style, and Marcus is trying
to see
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101575/#review5719
---
Any progress?
- Torgny
On June 10, 2011, 9:18 p.m., John
On Wednesday 08 June 2011 19.03.01 Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
As you already know, we have discussed the git workflow for KDE at the
Platform 11 sprint, and have come up with a recommendation. Please find the
full text here: http://community.kde.org/KDE_Core/Platform_11/Git_Workflow
Local
On Tuesday 10 May 2011 10.04.34 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
we have already been putting together plans, including documenting them
feature by feature in iceScrum
For those of us who this is the first time we hear about icsscrum where is it,
who can use it and for what?
/Regards
Torgny
On Thursday, May 12, 2011 14:38:57 Torgny Nyblom wrote:
On Tuesday 10 May 2011 10.04.34 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
[...]
Shaun gave the location; it's still experimental for us, though. We're
using
it for the next three months of plasma development, with a focus on Plasma
Active issues
On Tuesday 26 April 2011 15.52.18 John Layt wrote:
Hi,
Did anything come out from discussions on feature branch naming in git?
With GSoC starting soon we'll be getting a lot of new feature branches and
it would be nice if they were consistantly named to make them easy to find
and manage.
On Thursday 21 April 2011 21.25.13 Ian Monroe wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 06:56, Stefan Majewsky
stefan.majew...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
what is the technical procedure for moving libtagaro.git to kdereview?
I think sysadmins need be informed, and hope that those are reading
On Monday 31 January 2011 10.30.50 Ian Monroe wrote:
[...]
*We need to have a unified branch naming scheme. Basically we need to
come up with what we want the branches to be named, and then ask the
sysadmin team to rename them for us.
In use I think the 'KDE/' prefix is a bad idea, since
On Sunday 30 January 2011 14.38.17 Tom Albers wrote:
- Original Message -
On 1/30/2011 1:17 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
in the runtime repository, the pics directory doesn't seem
available, but
the main CMakelist.txt still looks for it.
kde-runtime is currently set read-only
On Friday 28 January 2011 00.06.21 Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
John Tapsell wrote:
2011/1/27 Nicolás Alvarez nicolas.alva...@gmail.com:
Please, help review the repositories before migration! Unlike KDE
software, here we won't have point releases to fix bugs later :)
I have quite a few
On Friday 28 January 2011 11.05.43 Johannes Sixt wrote:
Am 1/28/2011 10:31, schrieb Torgny Nyblom:
On Friday 28 January 2011 00.06.21 Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
John Tapsell wrote:
2011/1/27 Nicolás Alvarez nicolas.alva...@gmail.com:
Please, help review the repositories before migration
On Friday 28 January 2011 16.13.31 Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
Ian Monroe wrote:
For up to one week if someone finds a major problem in the history a
re-push will be considered. After that we'll just live with it.
...but far better would be for any problem to be found now. Please
note that
On Friday 21 January 2011 22.44.49 Ben Cooksley wrote:
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote:
On Thursday, January 20, 2011, Ben Cooksley wrote:
Correct, it is Gerrit which is a more git based alternative to
Reviewboard. http://code.google.com/p/gerrit/
On Sat, 1 Jan 2011 21:25:23 + (UTC)
Tom Albers t...@kde.org wrote:
[...]
40 kdelibs-bugs
28 plasma-bugs
If no one who actually use these lists step up I can try and take them.
/Torgny
33 matches
Mail list logo
