Re: Who relies on Soprano::Model::statement[s]Added|Removed signals?

2011-10-05 Thread Volker Krause
On Friday 30 September 2011 13:36:22 Sebastian Trüg wrote: Hi lists, with frameworks in the building and Nepomuk probably going that direction already for 4.8 I would like to clean up a bit. One of these cleanup tasks targets the Soprano::Model statement signals. So far these were the only

Re: Who relies on Soprano::Model::statement[s]Added|Removed signals?

2011-10-05 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Wednesday 05 October 2011 Oct, Volker Krause wrote: On Friday 30 September 2011 13:36:22 Sebastian Trüg wrote: Hi lists, with frameworks in the building and Nepomuk probably going that direction already for 4.8 I would like to clean up a bit. One of these cleanup tasks targets the

Re: Who relies on Soprano::Model::statement[s]Added|Removed signals?

2011-09-30 Thread Alex Merry
On 30/09/11 12:36, Sebastian Trüg wrote: I would like to anyone using the old API to change to the new ResourceWatcher as soon as possible because I would like to disable the old signals soon. They simply entail to many problems and clutter the API. You might want to contact developers using

Re: Who relies on Soprano::Model::statement[s]Added|Removed signals?

2011-09-30 Thread Sebastian Trüg
of course this is for the frameworks thingi. On 09/30/2011 07:09 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote: On 2011-09-30, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote: A Divendres, 30 de setembre de 2011, Sebastian Trüg vàreu escriure: Hi lists, with frameworks in the building and Nepomuk probably going that

Re: Re: Who relies on Soprano::Model::statement[s]Added|Removed signals?

2011-09-30 Thread Albert Astals Cid
A Divendres, 30 de setembre de 2011, Sebastian Trüg vàreu escriure: of course this is for the frameworks thingi. Oh, sorry for the misinterpretation. Albert On 09/30/2011 07:09 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote: On 2011-09-30, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote: A Divendres, 30 de setembre de