El Divendres, 6 de gener de 2012, a les 01:09:40, Albert Astals Cid va
escriure:
El Dijous, 5 de gener de 2012, a les 21:59:10, Lamarque V. Souza va
escriure:
Em Thursday 05 January 2012, Albert Astals Cid escreveu:
El Dijous, 5 de gener de 2012, a les 21:35:18, Lamarque V. Souza va
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 21.55.36 Lamarque V. Souza wrote:
My question is: since you know how to send patches to Qt's
repository wouldn't be better just send my patch upstream (it is
here https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=182672)
Contributing to Qt is a simple matter; after a
El Dimecres, 4 de gener de 2012, a les 21:55:36, Lamarque V. Souza va
escriure:
Em Wednesday 04 January 2012, Albert Astals Cid escreveu:
El Dimecres, 4 de gener de 2012, a les 23:40:26, David Faure va escriure:
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 18:51:44 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dimecres,
El Dijous, 5 de gener de 2012, a les 00:56:38, David Faure va escriure:
On Thursday 05 January 2012 00:17:33 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
khotkeys is already a kded module, so there won't be no more processes
waking up now than before by adding a new kded module.
Ah, OK.
kglobalaccel
El Dijous, 5 de gener de 2012, a les 01:36:08, Christoph Feck va escriure:
On Thursday 05 January 2012 00:17:33 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dimecres, 4 de gener de 2012, a les 23:40:26, David Faure va
escriure:
kglobalaccel seems quite suitable indeed, no?
It would, if Qt had a key
Em Thursday 05 January 2012, Albert Astals Cid escreveu:
El Dimecres, 4 de gener de 2012, a les 21:55:36, Lamarque V. Souza va
escriure:
Em Wednesday 04 January 2012, Albert Astals Cid escreveu:
El Dimecres, 4 de gener de 2012, a les 23:40:26, David Faure va
escriure:
On Wednesday 04
Em Thursday 05 January 2012, Thomas Zander escreveu:
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 21.55.36 Lamarque V. Souza wrote:
My question is: since you know how to send patches to Qt's
repository wouldn't be better just send my patch upstream (it is
here
El Dijous, 5 de gener de 2012, a les 21:35:18, Lamarque V. Souza va escriure:
Em Thursday 05 January 2012, Albert Astals Cid escreveu:
El Dimecres, 4 de gener de 2012, a les 21:55:36, Lamarque V. Souza va
escriure:
Em Wednesday 04 January 2012, Albert Astals Cid escreveu:
El
Em Thursday 05 January 2012, Albert Astals Cid escreveu:
El Dijous, 5 de gener de 2012, a les 21:35:18, Lamarque V. Souza va
escriure:
Em Thursday 05 January 2012, Albert Astals Cid escreveu:
El Dimecres, 4 de gener de 2012, a les 21:55:36, Lamarque V. Souza va
escriure:
Em
El Dijous, 5 de gener de 2012, a les 21:59:10, Lamarque V. Souza va escriure:
Em Thursday 05 January 2012, Albert Astals Cid escreveu:
El Dijous, 5 de gener de 2012, a les 21:35:18, Lamarque V. Souza va
escriure:
Em Thursday 05 January 2012, Albert Astals Cid escreveu:
El Dimecres, 4
Em Thursday 05 January 2012, Albert Astals Cid escreveu:
El Dijous, 5 de gener de 2012, a les 21:59:10, Lamarque V. Souza va
escriure:
Em Thursday 05 January 2012, Albert Astals Cid escreveu:
El Dijous, 5 de gener de 2012, a les 21:35:18, Lamarque V. Souza va
escriure:
Em Thursday
El Dimecres, 4 de gener de 2012, a les 01:53:13, Christoph Feck va escriure:
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 00:28:11 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
My little kded daemon that listens to XF86XK_TouchpadToggle and
enables disables the touchpad accordingly has been moved to
kdereview.
My plan is
Am 04.01.2012, 18:51 Uhr, schrieb Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org:
I don't really see any point in doing that, nothing can be shared
between them
and the existing ktouchpadenabler so instead of one simple codebase (166
lines
with 20 of headers) you end up adding more complexity to existing
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 18:51:44 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dimecres, 4 de gener de 2012, a les 01:53:13, Christoph Feck va escriure:
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 00:28:11 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
My little kded daemon that listens to XF86XK_TouchpadToggle and
enables disables the
El Dimecres, 4 de gener de 2012, a les 20:15:27, Thomas Lübking va escriure:
Am 04.01.2012, 18:51 Uhr, schrieb Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org:
I don't really see any point in doing that, nothing can be shared
between them
and the existing ktouchpadenabler so instead of one simple codebase
El Dimecres, 4 de gener de 2012, a les 23:40:26, David Faure va escriure:
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 18:51:44 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dimecres, 4 de gener de 2012, a les 01:53:13, Christoph Feck va
escriure:
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 00:28:11 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
My little
On Thursday 05 January 2012 00:17:33 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
khotkeys is already a kded module, so there won't be no more processes
waking up now than before by adding a new kded module.
Ah, OK.
kglobalaccel seems quite suitable indeed, no?
It would, if Qt had a key for
Em Wednesday 04 January 2012, Albert Astals Cid escreveu:
El Dimecres, 4 de gener de 2012, a les 23:40:26, David Faure va escriure:
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 18:51:44 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dimecres, 4 de gener de 2012, a les 01:53:13, Christoph Feck va
escriure:
On Wednesday
On Thursday 05 January 2012 00:17:33 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dimecres, 4 de gener de 2012, a les 23:40:26, David Faure va
escriure:
kglobalaccel seems quite suitable indeed, no?
It would, if Qt had a key for XF86XK_TouchpadToggle
[...]
Albert
Bummer, you are right, didn't think of
On Thursday, January 05, 2012 12:17:33 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dimecres, 4 de gener de 2012, a les 23:40:26, David Faure va escriure:
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 18:51:44 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dimecres, 4 de gener de 2012, a les 01:53:13, Christoph Feck va
escriure:
On
My little kded daemon that listens to XF86XK_TouchpadToggle and enables
disables the touchpad accordingly has been moved to kdereview.
My plan is moving it to extragear, not really sure if -base or -utils.
The code doesn't have a kcm or any kind of configuration since it is designed
to just
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 00:28:11 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
My little kded daemon that listens to XF86XK_TouchpadToggle and
enables disables the touchpad accordingly has been moved to
kdereview.
My plan is moving it to extragear, not really sure if -base or
-utils.
The code doesn't
22 matches
Mail list logo