---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112451/#review39357
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Luigi Toscano
On Sept. 4, 2013, 1:55
Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Diumenge, 29 de setembre de 2013, a les 12:14:49, David Faure va escriure:
On Monday 23 September 2013 20:23:13 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
So we don't have a man page anymore? Debian will be happy :D
Also we're losing the i18n-zation side of the man page, which the
for some files (especially the
css) at this point, right? Otherwise, ship it from me.
- Luigi Toscano
On Jan. 15, 2014, 2:08 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https
that they
are not used at all everywhere.
- Luigi Toscano
On Jan. 15, 2014, 2:08 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114971
://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/
---
(Updated Jan. 18, 2014, 1:16 p.m.)
Review request for Documentation, KDE Frameworks and Luigi Toscano.
Repository: kdoctools
Description
---
Part of the overall task
. I don't
see those options to be defined into Frameworks, which means that
{kde|kf}5options should be removed; are some of them provided by Qt directly?
If not, also qt5config should disappear. Can someone from the
kde-frameworks-devel list shed some light on this?
- Luigi Toscano
On Jan. 17
On Jan. 19, 2014, 12:39 a.m., Luigi Toscano wrote:
The patch looks ago, I have two remarks:
- I think that kde5options should be kf5options (as it happened with
kde4-config - kf5-config)
- I'm not sure if the content of those manpages still applies. The special
options described
wrote:
Well, most projects will start off depending on KDE4Support anyway, and
if you don't use it I think you should just get an error about the macro not
being found.
Luigi Toscano wrote:
My thoughts:
- is the dependency on KDE4Support the first thing a ported application
On Tuesday 21 of January 2014 16:42:42 Kevin Ottens wrote:
* tosky found out that the validity of the qtoptions and kdeoptions man
pages is in need of review;
* he's also working with the doc team toward a switch to docbook 4.2;
Quick patch: to docbook 4.5 (our documentation is based on 4.2
and the not-iterator
hack) unrelated?
- Luigi Toscano
On Jan. 21, 2014, 10:26 p.m., Alexander Richardson wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115202
On Jan. 21, 2014, 10:29 p.m., Luigi Toscano wrote:
Jut to be sure, are the two changes (optional KDocTools and the
not-iterator hack) unrelated?
Alexander Richardson wrote:
two separate commits, however kdoctools is broken on windows so I made it
optional to allow building
On Jan. 21, 2014, 10:29 p.m., Luigi Toscano wrote:
Jut to be sure, are the two changes (optional KDocTools and the
not-iterator hack) unrelated?
Alexander Richardson wrote:
two separate commits, however kdoctools is broken on windows so I made it
optional to allow building
by redefining only
docbookl10nhelper_EXE into the WIN32 block?
Could you please add the kdewin group as reviewers so that they can check if it
works with gcc too?
- Luigi Toscano
On Jan. 22, 2014, 1:26 a.m., Alexander Richardson wrote
On Jan. 22, 2014, 11:32 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
Well, but frameworks are not only for frameworks. They're all ported
because I ported them.
OTOH, there will be non-ported applications, that's why we provide this
warning.
Luigi Toscano wrote:
You ported
://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115213/
---
(Updated Jan. 22, 2014, 7:01 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Luigi Toscano.
Repository: kdoctools
Description
---
As discussed in Review Request 115077
Diffs
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115213/#review48004
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Luigi Toscano
On Jan. 22, 2014, 7:01
with me (other opinions are
welcome of course!)
- Luigi Toscano
On Jan. 22, 2014, 9:28 p.m., David Narváez wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115237
with me (other opinions are
welcome of course!)
- Luigi Toscano
On Jan. 22, 2014, 9:29 p.m., David Narváez wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115239
On Jan. 23, 2014, 9:28 a.m., David Faure wrote:
Oh, OK, didn't know this was broken on MSVC. Worth a Qt fix or at least
bugreport?
Thiago reported it: see
http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-buildsystemm=139042097719628w=2 and
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,76311
- Luigi
an
opinion from kdewin group
- Luigi Toscano
On Jan. 22, 2014, 3:12 p.m., Alexander Richardson wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115209
place, we can always
rediscuss (and redefine this variable to use the generic one). I don't think it
will happen but let's see :)
- Luigi Toscano
On Feb. 3, 2014, 8:26 a.m., David Narváez wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e
---
Documentation of higher level frameworks (kio) and applications (kate, konsole)
compiles.
Thanks,
Luigi Toscano
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
/xslt.cpp 79578ed
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115597/diff/
Testing
---
Documentation of higher level frameworks (kio) and applications (kate, konsole)
compiles.
Thanks,
Luigi Toscano
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde
.
I have no idea about Windows and I don't have the resources to test it, but I
hope this will be checked.
- Luigi Toscano
On Feb. 12, 2014, 9:46 p.m., Harald Fernengel wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply
:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115708/
---
(Updated Feb. 12, 2014, 9:46 p.m.)
Review request for Documentation, KDE Frameworks and Luigi Toscano.
Repository: kdoctools
Description
it!
src/xslt.cpp
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115209/#comment34978
As you are here, can you please change this to const QString result = ... ?
- Luigi Toscano
On Feb. 13, 2014, 7:56 p.m., Alexander Richardson wrote
is really needed.
The origin of that code traces back to this commit (with a reference
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=293610):
http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=kdelibs.gita=commith=38b5e7f937b5d2c291c5b20a0c8648632084dde5
- Luigi Toscano
On Feb. 14, 2014, 12:29 a.m., Alexander Richardson wrote
---
DOCBOOK_XML_CURRDTD is not used, so remove its definition (leftover of kdelibs
splitting).
Diffs
-
src/ioslaves/help/config-help.h.cmake f2fe22c
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115853/diff/
Testing
---
kio compiles and installs.
Thanks,
Luigi Toscano
/115853/#review50115
---
On Feb. 17, 2014, 10:03 p.m., Luigi Toscano wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115853
find-modules/FindDocBookXML4.cmake PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115876/diff/
Testing
---
Compiles (some changes are needed in KDocTools, I will add them to another
review).
Thanks,
Luigi Toscano
___
Kde-frameworks
-kdoctools.h.cmake f2fe22c
src/CMakeLists.txt 241d56f
src/customization/dtd/kdex.dtd.cmake c643d9b
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115879/diff/
Testing
---
Compiles, the relevant files (like customization/dtd/kdex.dtd) are generated
Thanks,
Luigi Toscano
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115876/#review50181
---
On Feb. 18, 2014, 10:52 p.m., Luigi Toscano wrote
would like to make
sure that the needed files (4.2) are really there, so I would like to call
FindDocBookXML4 for that.
- Luigi Toscano
On Feb. 19, 2014, 12:47 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail
in CMakeLists.txt mean that
they are going to exported?
- Luigi Toscano
On Feb. 19, 2014, 12:47 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115896
On Feb. 19, 2014, 12:52 p.m., Luigi Toscano wrote:
Uhm, well, not sure about the non-usage in kde4support: I would like to
make sure that the needed files (4.2) are really there, so I would like to
call FindDocBookXML4 for that.
Alex Merry wrote:
Oh, I see, it's going to look
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115818/#review50252
---
On Feb. 16, 2014, 8:16 p.m., Luigi Toscano wrote
/
---
(Updated Feb. 19, 2014, 7:45 p.m.)
Review request for Documentation, KDE Frameworks and Luigi Toscano.
Repository: kdoctools
Description
---
Fix projects using KDocTools on windows.
If ${CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX}/${DATA_INSTALL_DIR} contained /../ elements
file(RELATIVE_PATH
On Feb. 19, 2014, 12:52 p.m., Luigi Toscano wrote:
Uhm, well, not sure about the non-usage in kde4support: I would like to
make sure that the needed files (4.2) are really there, so I would like to
call FindDocBookXML4 for that.
Alex Merry wrote:
Oh, I see, it's going to look
-
src/meinproc.cpp 86e83ae
src/xslt.h 6fd2dae
src/xslt.cpp 70e0d6a
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115818/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Luigi Toscano
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https
On Feb. 19, 2014, 12:52 p.m., Luigi Toscano wrote:
Uhm, well, not sure about the non-usage in kde4support: I would like to
make sure that the needed files (4.2) are really there, so I would like to
call FindDocBookXML4 for that.
Alex Merry wrote:
Oh, I see, it's going to look
, the change looks fine and it's
windows only. There is enough time to fix it before the final release.
- Luigi Toscano
On Feb. 19, 2014, 7:45 p.m., Alexander Richardson wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit
Hi all,
these are the steps of plan for bumping the default DocBook XML version to 4.5
while keeping the compatibility on the old 4.2-based when kde4support is used:
1) commit rename/changes of FindDocBookXML (RR 115876 and 115879);
2) kde4support: copy files FindDocBookXML, catalog.xml,
On Feb. 21, 2014, 7:47 p.m., Luigi Toscano wrote:
The files have been moved to kdoctools, should I open a new review against
the kdoctools component or can I get a shipit here? :)
Alex Merry wrote:
I thought I'd already made this reply, but let's try again... (maybe I
did
On Feb. 21, 2014, 7:47 p.m., Luigi Toscano wrote:
The files have been moved to kdoctools, should I open a new review against
the kdoctools component or can I get a shipit here? :)
Alex Merry wrote:
I thought I'd already made this reply, but let's try again... (maybe I
did
customization/dtd/kdex.dtd) are generated
Thanks,
Luigi Toscano
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
).
Thanks,
Luigi Toscano
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
is generated.
Thanks,
Luigi Toscano
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
/#review50436
---
On Feb. 22, 2014, 6:19 p.m., Luigi Toscano wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115879
?
- Luigi Toscano
On Feb. 19, 2014, 11:45 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115897/
---
(Updated
/customization/dtd/kdex.dtd.cmake c643d9b
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115956/diff/
Testing
---
Compiles, documentation is generated.
Thanks,
Luigi Toscano
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org
On Feb. 22, 2014, 6:29 p.m., Luigi Toscano wrote:
As this was already committed, can this RR be closed?
Alex Merry wrote:
Actually, I never committed this one, since I never got a ship it. I
added the files to kdoctools, but never removed them from e-c-m.
Is a shipit really needed
/kdex.dtd.cmake c643d9b
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115956/diff/
Testing
---
Compiles, documentation is generated.
Thanks,
Luigi Toscano
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo
Alex Merry wrote:
I screwed up the history import of the FindDocBook*.cmake files from
e-c-m into KDocTools, so Luigi asked me to do it again. This involves
removing those files, then merging in a more sensible history (that
isn't curtailed like the other one was).
This can be found at
the final
release), but please do *not* commit this until the changes described in
KDocTools history import thread (kde-frameworks-devel) are pushed.
- Luigi Toscano
On Feb. 25, 2014, 1:02 a.m., T.C. Hollingsworth wrote
.
Thanks,
Luigi Toscano
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
.
Thanks,
Luigi Toscano
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
to kdoctools, it's time to remove
them from ecm.
- Luigi Toscano
On Feb. 19, 2014, 11:45 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115897
Martin Klapetek wrote:
Hey,
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:32 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
Will the KDE Software Compilation still be a thing in the KF5 era,
complete with its own versioned releases? If that's the case, we'll
probably just want to change KDE to KDE SC in the
PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116069/diff/
Testing
---
Compilation of kde4support (with RR116068), then compilation of konsole.
Thanks,
Luigi Toscano
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https
/116068/diff/
Testing
---
Compilation (including the other RR)
Thanks,
Luigi Toscano
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116069/diff/
Testing
---
Compilation of kde4support (with RR116068), then compilation of konsole.
Thanks,
Luigi Toscano
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116037/#review51163
---
Ship it!
This review can go in :)
- Luigi Toscano
On Feb
(including the other RR)
Thanks,
Luigi Toscano
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
/catalog4.xml PRE-CREATION
src/customization/dtd/kdex.dtd.cmake PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116069/diff/
Testing
---
Compilation of kde4support (with RR116068), then compilation of konsole.
Thanks,
Luigi Toscano
___
Kde
, my knowledge in this area is
not so much but you convinced me, and we have some time for going back in case
of issues.
- Luigi Toscano
On Feb. 27, 2014, 3:21 p.m., Kevin Funk wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail
/
---
(Updated Feb. 25, 2014, 1:02 a.m.)
Review request for Documentation, KDE Frameworks, Luigi Toscano, Burkhard
Lück, and Yuri Chornoivan.
Repository: kdoctools
Description
---
-kde; is no longer semantically identified as an acronym
David Faure wrote:
On Saturday 01 March 2014 12:49:02 Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
If I am not mistaken, KJSEmbed depends on KDocTools because it uses
kdoctools_create_manpage. Would it be an option to generate the man page
without KDocTools. It's a bit sad to bump it from tier 2 to tier 3 just
: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116069/diff/
Testing
---
Compilation of kde4support (with RR116068), then compilation of konsole.
Thanks,
Luigi Toscano
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org
Hi all,
the version of DocBookXML used by our documentation has been changed in
Frameworks; our custom DTD is now based on 4.5 instead of 4.2. The change
should be *almost* painless, because the new version is backward compatibile.
Only the DTD needs to be changed.
Exception: if your application
) with -o /something/with/a/.dotdir/myfile.txt (the
directory must exist), no error anymore and the file is generated.
Thanks,
Luigi Toscano
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde
:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116604/#review52091
---
On March 5, 2014, 1:06 a.m., Luigi Toscano wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116604/diff/
Testing
---
Run meinproc5 (and 4) with -o /something/with/a/.dotdir/myfile.txt (the
directory must exist), no error anymore and the file is generated.
Thanks,
Luigi Toscano
___
Kde
://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116650/#comment37094
It is needed indeed...
- Luigi Toscano
On March 7, 2014, 3:05 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116650
documentation still uses the old DTD (oktate)
compiles correctly.
Thanks,
Luigi Toscano
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
/kio_help.cpp 85b7975
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116681/diff/
Testing
---
kioclient cat help:/kioslave/ftp (from frameworks branch of kde-runtime) now
works.
Thanks,
Luigi Toscano
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde
other parts of code which use QStandardPaths should be
checked.
Diffs
-
src/ioslaves/help/kio_help.cpp 85b7975
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116681/diff/
Testing
---
kioclient cat help:/kioslave/ftp (from frameworks branch of kde-runtime) now
works.
Thanks,
Luigi
/documentationnotfound/index.docbook PRE-CREATION
src/ioslaves/help/kio_help.cpp d693442
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116685/diff/
Testing
---
kioclient cat help:/foobar shows the content of documentationnotfound instead
of There is no documentation available for /foobar.
Thanks,
Luigi
of There is no documentation available for /foobar.
Thanks,
Luigi Toscano
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
/116650/#comment37141
Does it work on Windows?
- Luigi Toscano
On March 10, 2014, 5:17 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116650
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116650/#review52690
---
Ship it!
Perfect, thanks!
- Luigi Toscano
On March 11
the content of documentationnotfound instead
of There is no documentation available for /foobar.
Thanks,
Luigi Toscano
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
the content of documentationnotfound instead
of There is no documentation available for /foobar.
Thanks,
Luigi Toscano
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
; as a suggestion, I would
explicitly mention that this is for environments where each module is
installed using a different prefix as I wrote in the related commit (for
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116670/).
- Luigi Toscano
On March 13, 2014, 12:59 p.m., Aurélien Gâteau wrote
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116785/#review52892
---
Ship it!
Discussed on IRC
- Luigi Toscano
On March 13
/#comment37240
Please save the value of tss before the call, otherwise it will be always
empty
- Luigi Toscano
On March 13, 2014, 5:39 p.m., Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit
/#comment37262
(spotted by Pino, thanks) could you please wrap the definition of the body
of DIE using the 'do {} while(0)' syntax?
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/257418/do-while-0-what-is-it-good-for
After that, feel free to commit and thanks again!
- Luigi Toscano
On March
:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116037/
---
(Updated Feb. 25, 2014, 2:02 a.m.)
Review request for Documentation, KDE Frameworks, Luigi Toscano, Burkhard
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116979/#review53769
---
Ship it!
Well, nothing to say, thanks!
- Luigi Toscano
not sure this is
the correct solution, but I would prefer if someone with more knowledge of
QStandardPaths and Windows could speak up.
- Luigi Toscano
On March 24, 2014, 12:28 a.m., Andrius da Costa Ribas wrote
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117061/#review54133
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Luigi Toscano
On March 25, 2014, 5:44
Àlex Fiestas ha scritto:
Hi there
Today Aleix and I are starting to split kde-runtime so we have gone through
all the components again making sure that everything has a suitable
destination. The result is this [1] wiki.
Please, check that you are ok with the destination of each
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117106/diff/
Testing
---
It compiles, documentation is generated (also for other higher level
frameworks, tested with kio)
Thanks,
Luigi Toscano
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel
to
https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/2014-February/012182.html
Plus I've been a bit too busy to even reply to list mail. :-( Will try
and finish this up by the end of the week.
Luigi Toscano wrote:
Ping? Friday 28th is the tag date for beta1.
Kevin Ottens
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117106/#review54327
---
On March 27, 2014, 9:49 p.m., Luigi Toscano wrote
-meinproc5.8.docbook 7b4c535
src/customization/htdig_index.xsl 7aa9113
src/meinproc.cpp a7b2e07
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117106/diff/
Testing
---
It compiles, documentation is generated (also for other higher level
frameworks, tested with kio)
Thanks,
Luigi Toscano
On Friday 28 of March 2014 19:28:16 Yuri Chornoivan wrote:
Hi,
https://projects.kde.org/projects/frameworks/kcoreaddons/repository/revision
s/master/entry/src/lib/kaboutdata.cpp#L258
licenseShort = QCoreApplication::translate(KAboutLicense, @item license
(short name), GPL v2);
is
David Faure ha scritto:
On Friday 28 March 2014 21:27:05 Jonathan Riddell wrote:
Can you say if this is the right thing to do?
It'll mean the other files in kde-l10n-* also need renamed.
Yes.
I'm a bit confused now: what files are to be renamed? The ones in the SVN
repository under
On Tuesday 01 of April 2014 15:01:20 David Faure wrote:
but I can't fix it? ;)
I removed a very old obsolete method from kwindowsystem, then I noticed kwin
was still using it, but I can't push the fix?
[...]
To g...@git.kde.org:kde-workspace
! [remote rejected] master - master (hook
and the documentation:
Sonnet is Tier 1, KDocTools is Tier 2 (and even if it was Tier 1, the rule
would forbid its usage) :(
- Luigi Toscano
On April 2, 2014, 1:05 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply
: kdoctools
Description
---
- adapt to the split world, no references to SC
Diffs
-
src/man-template.docbook 6c2e995
src/template.docbook 3b5dc8a
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117341/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Luigi Toscano
1 - 100 of 1035 matches
Mail list logo
