more obvious that the value is relative to the non-dimmed brightness.
Sebastian Kügler wrote:
Just set the minimum brightness to 1 instead of 0. We're generally not
adding config options for this kind of things.
Danny Baumann wrote:
That doesn't help though, as with intel-backlight 1
On March 31, 2013, 4:14 p.m., Àlex Fiestas wrote:
To be honest I don't like adding yet another configuration option by
default, a configuration option that apparently is needed only in some
systems.
There is no other alternative than this?
Danny Baumann wrote:
Well, I don't
more obvious that the value is relative to the non-dimmed brightness.
Sebastian Kügler wrote:
Just set the minimum brightness to 1 instead of 0. We're generally not
adding config options for this kind of things.
Danny Baumann wrote:
That doesn't help though, as with intel-backlight 1
more obvious that the value is relative to the non-dimmed brightness.
Sebastian Kügler wrote:
Just set the minimum brightness to 1 instead of 0. We're generally not
adding config options for this kind of things.
Danny Baumann wrote:
That doesn't help though, as with intel-backlight 1
more obvious that the value is relative to the non-dimmed brightness.
Sebastian Kügler wrote:
Just set the minimum brightness to 1 instead of 0. We're generally not
adding config options for this kind of things.
Danny Baumann wrote:
That doesn't help though, as with intel-backlight 1
more obvious that the value is relative to the non-dimmed brightness.
Sebastian Kügler wrote:
Just set the minimum brightness to 1 instead of 0. We're generally not
adding config options for this kind of things.
Danny Baumann wrote:
That doesn't help though, as with intel-backlight 1
On April 2, 2013, 2:58 p.m., Oliver Henshaw wrote:
powerdevil/daemon/actions/bundled/dimdisplay.cpp, lines 53-62
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109792/diff/1/?file=125986#file125986line53
Resolving bug #304696 is good, in my eyes. I'd like affirmation from
Dario though.
Hi David,
On Monday, March 25, 2013 01:30:17 David Baum wrote:
because I'm new to this mailing list I want to introduce myself. I'm a 24
years old student from Germany, interested in C++, software tests and
generative programming. I'm using KDE since several years and now I'm
trying to
Hi Vasily,
On Thursday, March 21, 2013 22:59:46 Vasily Fomin wrote:
The question is: what do you think about this feature? should we have it?
It depends on what the hardware offers, so can't be made to work in KDE's
power management code.
Cheers,
--
sebas
http://www.kde.org |
Hi,
In the plasma team, while working on the frameworks port, we run into
unexpected changes quite often. In most cases, something in
kdelibs[frameworks] or in e-c-m changed, and we only find out the hard way,
and then have to sift through git logs, patches, cmake files etc. to sort it
out
On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 19:32:44 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
here's a really short summary of the current state of the buildsystem in
kdelibs.
kdeqtstaging, all libraries in tier1/ and all libraries in tier2/ can be
built as part of kdelibs, or each one separately stand-alone.
So,
On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 13:08:13 Marco Martin wrote:
Hi all,
there are at the moment some problems linking to the kde4support library
from plasma-framework (yes, we'll eventually port out of it, but one thing
at a time ;)
in the cmake i do
find_package(kde4support REQUIRED)
and
On Thursday, February 28, 2013 13:24:26 Yuri Chornoivan wrote:
On February 28th, 2013, 1:02 p.m. UTC, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
The names are getting too long this way, and will not look good in the KCM.
That is their primary usecase, and there it is clear they they belong in
the Power
On Thursday, February 28, 2013 00:10:01 Valentin Rusu wrote:
On Wednesday 27 February 2013 22:02:52 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
I just pushed a change to kdelibs, which renames the libraries in tier1/
and tier2/ to CamelCase, e.g. we have now libKCoreAddons.so etc.
Along with that
On Monday, February 25, 2013 17:38:09 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
in kexportplugin.h there is this:
#pragma message(K_EXPORT_PLUGIN is defined as a hack here, for compat. Port
to new plugin system (QT_PLUGIN_METADATA) instead.)
this was introduced in the first revision of this file (58606a42).
On Sunday, February 24, 2013 11:33:50 todd rme wrote:
Although I will not be able to mentor, I have come up with a few
possible ideas for GSOC fitting with this year's polish existing
things theme. They may or may not be appropriate or even desirable,
so feel free to ignore any or all of
On Tuesday, February 26, 2013 14:40:18 Lydia Pintscher wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org wrote:
On Sunday, February 24, 2013 11:33:50 todd rme wrote:
Although I will not be able to mentor, I have come up with a few
possible ideas for GSOC fitting
On Monday, February 18, 2013 20:37:20 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Right.
But AFAIK we always tried to say that there will be no KDE 5...
As Sebas confirms in his email.
And if we'll call it KDE 5 anyway, then why not just use kde5 in names
instead of kf5, which doesn't have the well-known kde
On Saturday, February 16, 2013 10:49:11 Kevin Ottens wrote:
On Saturday 16 February 2013 10:31:38 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Hi,
AFAIK KDE based on KDE frameworks will not be KDE 5, but still KDE4.
So... I noticed that we install some things to directories containing
kf5,
Hi,
As you know, I'm working on porting the Plasma imports to Plasma2. As we've
made good progress, maybe time to give a status update:
* PlasmaCore - Mostly done
Missing are Dialog and ToolTip, which probably need a reimplemention
* QtExtras - Done
Even better: all seems to work fine
*
be available to the general public (after all, being able
to see the battery is also only one keystroke away)
- Sebastian Kügler
On Feb. 10, 2013, 10:54 p.m., Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit
On Feb. 14, 2013, 2:03 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
I'm not happy with it, UI-wise, for the following reasons:
- the OSD is an indicator of the user changing a setting, not a status
display
- the feature is entirely hidden, meaning that nobody will know it, notice
it, and use
On Tuesday, February 12, 2013 02:42:04 rahul bhola wrote:
i am interested in this project.We could even add the functionality of
matrix algebra and make it similar to matlab or octave. Please send me the
download link to this.
I don't know which link you mean, but you can download source code
Hi,
I've just pushed a change to plasma-frameworks which introduces a change to
the installation path for your QtQuick2 imports, moving it under
$PREFIX/lib/qml basically. (They previously went into $PREFIX/qml, which is a
bit ugly.) It also means you have to update extra-cmake-modules.
This
[adding frameworks list, slipped out]
On Monday, February 11, 2013 10:49:08 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Sunday, February 10, 2013 14:33:49 Thiago Macieira wrote:
On domingo, 10 de fevereiro de 2013 21.22.05, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
Apparently not. I've looked at where the example imports
On Monday, February 11, 2013 17:43:01 Stephen Kelly wrote:
Sebastian Kügler wrote:
What do you need it for, exactly?
To find out where Qt will look for QtQuick2 imports (that's
$ARCHDATADIR/qml, defaulting to $PREFIX/qml, which leads to /usr/qml).
I'd like to be able to install
On Sunday, February 10, 2013 14:33:49 Thiago Macieira wrote:
On domingo, 10 de fevereiro de 2013 21.22.05, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
Apparently not. I've looked at where the example imports from the Qt
codebase install these things, and that is indeed $PREFIX/qml, not inside
the plugin
[adding frameworks list, slipped out]
On Monday, February 11, 2013 10:49:08 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Sunday, February 10, 2013 14:33:49 Thiago Macieira wrote:
On domingo, 10 de fevereiro de 2013 21.22.05, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
Apparently not. I've looked at where the example imports
On Monday, February 11, 2013 17:03:55 Stephen Kelly wrote:
Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Sunday, February 10, 2013 14:33:49 Thiago Macieira wrote:
On domingo, 10 de fevereiro de 2013 21.22.05, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
Apparently not. I've looked at where the example imports from the Qt
On Monday, February 11, 2013 17:43:01 Stephen Kelly wrote:
Sebastian Kügler wrote:
What do you need it for, exactly?
To find out where Qt will look for QtQuick2 imports (that's
$ARCHDATADIR/qml, defaulting to $PREFIX/qml, which leads to /usr/qml).
I'd like to be able to install
: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108889/diff/
Testing
---
Used it in plasma-framework, functions as expected.
Thanks,
Sebastian Kügler
Hi Alexander,
On Sunday, February 10, 2013 19:28:19 Alexander Rössler wrote:
I'm interested in adding my application to the KDE project and to mentor
some students during GSoC. The application is PhyxCalc (http://qt-
apps.org/content/show.php/PhyxCalc?content=149140
). I think I have already
-
kde-modules/KDEInstallDirs.cmake ea132e6
Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108889/diff/
Testing
---
Used it in plasma-framework, functions as expected.
Thanks,
Sebastian Kügler
imports in it anymore).
Diffs
-
kde-modules/KDEInstallDirs.cmake ea132e6
Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108889/diff/
Testing
---
Used it in plasma-framework, functions as expected.
Thanks,
Sebastian Kügler
---
On Feb. 10, 2013, 3:37 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108889
Hey all,
So we still want to have Plasma and Solid sprints this spring, time to make
some arrangements for that.
I've talked to our potential sponsor, and they said they could host also a
larger group, so combining two sprints would probably work (but not be
necessary, if we decide so). The
On Thursday, January 24, 2013 22:48:00 Mark wrote:
In my project is need to create thumbnails of files and am using
PreviewJob for that right now. It works fine, no issue there, but i
have a slightly different workflow that doesn't seem to fit the
PreviewJob class.
My flow should go as
/#comment19891
brackets
plasma/generic/applets/systemtray/ui/autohide.ui
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108570/#comment19893
necessary to add width and height here?
- Sebastian Kügler
On Jan. 24, 2013, 5:34 a.m., Sandro Andrade wrote
On Wednesday, January 23, 2013 08:33:55 Till Adam wrote:
That was me, it seems, please accept my apologies. I was under the imression
that commit to 4.10, merge 4.10 into master is the recommended work flow.
If I understand correctly the problem was that I committed to a 4.10 that
had just
On Saturday, January 19, 2013 20:03:08 ravindra rakshit wrote:
can anyone suggest how can i gain authentication for the following link-
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/private/kde-devel/attachments/20130119/c9cc78d5
/attachment.html
Subscribing to the list would work.
The email you link is
On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 19:43:32 Christian Esken wrote:
I did not expect that this patched would be pushed into KDE4.10, as we are
past release candidate 2 already. Is this really well tested, especially
with theme changes, font changes and so on?
My emails say, that it's only gone into
On Tuesday, January 01, 2013 17:41:19 József Makay wrote:
Guys, I would like give only an design idea for KDE project. The layout is
good for mobiles and tablets touch screens. Furthermore it pick up the
competition with rival (Unity, Gnome 3, Metro). So the question: Would you
work with me
On Tuesday, January 01, 2013 15:39:27 Ben Cooksley wrote:
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 3:31 AM, Antonis Tsiapaliokas kok...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
We would like to inform you that all the above issues of the plasmate has
been fixed.
Can someone move it to extragear?
Which project(s)
On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 23:14:01 Dawit A wrote:
Well that is not entirely correct. We can definitely implement support for
private mode in the cookiejar itself easily. There are a couple of
approaches we can take. The difficult part has always been how to handle
the private session
anyway stuff, makes the
code much cleaner. I haven't tested it, but it *looks* good to me. 4.9, 4.10
and master branches, please.
- Sebastian Kügler
On Dec. 19, 2012, 1:46 p.m., Sebastian Gottfried wrote:
---
This is an automatically
Hi Ayudh,
On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 19:11:03 Ayudh Das wrote:
I am a CS undergrad student from India. I want to get involved with kde as a
developer. I particularly love ownClown and want to contribute to the
mentioned project. I am an average programmer and I am willing to learn
anything
On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 20:18:50 Ayudh Das wrote:
Thank you Sebastian for the response. I am going through the code and the
blogs you suggested and will be very happy to help.
Cool. :)
Feel free to post any questions to the owncloud list, I'm reading it almost
daily.
Cheers,
--
sebas
On Monday, December 10, 2012 00:30:57 Jörg Ehrichs wrote:
So if I get your ok for the current status I'll tell the admins to
move this to extragear first.
I'm happy with the explanations, you have my OK. :)
Thanks for being patient about this, I hope it will just prevent us from being
bitten
On Tuesday, December 11, 2012 20:42:33 Lisa Vitolo wrote:
What do you mean by mergeable with 4.10?
A patch or branch that cleanly applies against 4.10 (so the master branch in
most repositories right now).
--
sebas
http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
Hi all,
Marco and I have been working on libplasma2 in the frameworks branch. The past
days have produced the following changes:
kdelibs/plasma is now only built on top of Qt
was: kdelibs/plasma is not built at all on Qt5, as well as the kdeclarative
library. We discussed this, and decided
Hi Jörg,
On Tuesday, December 04, 2012 14:17:33 Jörg Ehrichs wrote:
This sounds a bit like you're ignoring most of the feedback you got.
No didn't ignore any reviews. I've changed/implemented each and every
suggestion/review I've got.
Sorry, I think I came over a bit disrespectful for your
Hi,
On Sunday, December 02, 2012 21:05:08 Jörg Ehrichs wrote:
So it's been a while and I've changed most part of what was
suggested. (thanks for the hints again)
The program changed its name to Nepomuk-WebMiner for better
indication what it actually does and it respects the users privacy as
On Tuesday, November 20, 2012 22:06:01 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
Please take 3 minutes out of your busy schedules, have a look at our
feature plan and update the entries you are aware of that are done (even
if it's not your name next to it, quality of the document counts, not names
in editing
On Tuesday, November 20, 2012 22:16:36 Martin Klapetek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org wrote:
On Tuesday, November 20, 2012 22:06:01 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
Please take 3 minutes out of your busy schedules, have a look at our
feature plan and update
Hi everybody,
Please take 3 minutes out of your busy schedules, have a look at our feature
plan and update the entries you are aware of that are done (even if it's not
your name next to it, quality of the document counts, not names in editing
history).
On Tuesday, November 20, 2012 22:06:01 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
Please take 3 minutes out of your busy schedules, have a look at our
feature plan and update the entries you are aware of that are done (even
if it's not your name next to it, quality of the document counts, not names
in editing
On Tuesday, November 20, 2012 22:16:36 Martin Klapetek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org wrote:
On Tuesday, November 20, 2012 22:06:01 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
Please take 3 minutes out of your busy schedules, have a look at our
feature plan and update
Hi Jörg,
On Tuesday, November 06, 2012 11:19:26 Jörg Ehrichs wrote:
2012/10/31 Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org
But I assume this is something the packagers have to split.
That would be almost making sure that it will hit users. In general, never
assume something's going to be fixed
On Sunday, November 04, 2012 09:34:03 Andriy Rysin wrote:
* or we should rebase feature branch on master and then generate the
review diff?
That should work.
--
sebas
http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
On Friday, November 02, 2012 09:24:02 Ben Cooksley wrote:
The following also appears to have failed to send a email requesting review:
- Stackfolder Plasma Applet (stackfolder)
We're reviewing it right now, so I suppose it won't skip the next step after
that (i.e. the move).
Thanks for the
On Friday, November 02, 2012 09:24:02 Ben Cooksley wrote:
The following also appears to have failed to send a email requesting review:
- Stackfolder Plasma Applet (stackfolder)
We're reviewing it right now, so I suppose it won't skip the next step after
that (i.e. the move).
Thanks for the
On Tuesday, October 30, 2012 23:11:57 Jörg Ehrichs wrote:
today I've moved my metadata extractor into KDE Review [1].
As kde-libs is frozen till kf5 I like to get this into extragear/base
(unless anyone has a better idea where to put this).
This doesn't look like it's kdelibs material anyway,
Hi Jörg,
On Wednesday, October 31, 2012 19:59:52 Jörg Ehrichs wrote:
2012/10/31 Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org:
This doesn't look like it's kdelibs material anyway, so it's not affected
by the kdelibs freeze.
The only reason to put in into kde-libs is the fact, that all other
Nepomuk
On Thursday, October 25, 2012 20:00:25 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
not automatically, no. but QActions are QObjects, so you can attach to their
signals in the QML.
And it's quite wonky, for example offering a list of QActions
(QDeclarativeListProperty or QList, even with the payload casted to
://git.reviewboard.kde.org//r/106755/#scomment101
This tooltip looks really odd and out of place this way.:/
- Sebastian Kügler
On Oct. 12, 2012, 9:41 a.m., Jonathan Marten wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http
On Friday, October 12, 2012 13:42:35 Lamarque Vieira Souza wrote:
This tooltip looks really odd and out of place this way.:/
The transparency effect does not look good here. I would like to know how to
disable it too, there is this bug against the QML shutdown dialog with the
same problem:
On Wednesday, October 10, 2012 15:46:08 Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
I didn’t touch that code at all. The previous version also didn’t enable
them in such case. If you could point me to a signal that is emitted when
such an event occurs, I could come up with something.
I think that's really a corner
On Wednesday, October 10, 2012 14:46:34 Dario Freddi wrote:
Hence, the fact that batteryCount == 0 might also mean that the battery is
simply unplugged,
As far as I know, it's the battery bays that are counted. Unplug your batter,
and it still will be counted. (For thinkpads that can have a
Hi Sivan,
On Monday, October 08, 2012 15:37:14 Sivan Greenberg wrote:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org wrote:
- If you need something infrastructure, the KDE sysadmin team can help
you.
Right, so code repository will be needed as soon as I finish the
mobile
On Wednesday, October 03, 2012 20:44:39 Hakan Bayindir wrote:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/2690/#review10971
I also disagree with the patch. Syncing a file system is expensive and
degrades performance. Also, latest KDE releases have an implicit please
wait, I'm writing your data to your
://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106670/#comment15666
I don't see a reason to tell the user to unplug.
- Sebastian Kügler
On Oct. 1, 2012, 1:37 p.m., Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http
On Sunday, June 17, 2012 03:44:04 Inge Wallin wrote:
As far as I could understand from the above the main ideas are:
- Splitting the SC into 3 parts
- Shortening the release cycles significantly.
Only the first one is subject of this proposal.
The length of the release cycles is an
On Monday, June 18, 2012 00:26:13 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
* Need more people to do the tarball packaging/releasing (since if you
propose to release that often you can't expect the same person to be doing
packages almost weekly or byweekly given the release dates won't probably
align)
On Monday, June 18, 2012 11:52:46 Myriam Schweingruber wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org wrote:
On Saturday, June 16, 2012 08:18:05 Maksim Orlovich wrote:
...
What continuous integration and automated testing? How many apps have
any?
That's
On Monday, June 18, 2012 19:21:29 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
know the current state of the release and commit new features or new
strings when we are frozen, and that's with just one release schedule, i
can imagine the mess with N different release schedules
Always summer in trunk. As
On Saturday, June 16, 2012 08:18:05 Maksim Orlovich wrote:
How do you reconcile this proposal with our current troubles in 4.8.4,
where you need certain particular combinations of two sets of
libraries for things not to blow up? Your proposal increases the
number of combinations in wide use,
On Sunday, June 10, 2012 01:22:03 Kevin Kofler wrote:
On Sunday 10 June 2012, Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
Why not start now and make the next kdelibs 4.8.5? Releasing a kdelibs
4.9 will just add to the confusion of how kdelibs development is
working.
Because having a kdelibs version different
On Monday, June 11, 2012 16:25:17 Scott Kitterman wrote:
Currently my About KDE says:
Platform Version 4.8.3 (4.8.3)
Once kdelibs versioning is desynchronized from the rest of the platform,
what version is it?
At least application-version and underlying-platform-version might (or might
Kevin,
On Saturday, June 09, 2012 23:20:16 Kevin Kofler wrote:
you are hurting everyone else trying to package Plasma Active.
You should start considering that we're actually creating the thing. If we had
promised you it was fit for general consumption by any distro packager, you
might have
On Saturday, June 09, 2012 11:58:44 Kevin Kofler wrote:
Yes, it's stupid, but it's how the kdelibs maintainers want things to be.
:-(
There's a difference between I don't follow the reasoning or I don't think
the maintainer's reasons are valid and stupid.
Please be more respectful, or go
Please note, that these (this issue, and the two others reported by Albert to
k-c-d) are not just random reports, but problems Albert found while preparing
the beta1 packages. These issues are very annoying, yet we didn't consider
them showstoppers for the 4.9 beta1, but they might become
Hi,
Here's a braindump of the ones I know.
On Tuesday, May 22, 2012 09:48:49 Myriam Schweingruber wrote:
akademy-sponsoring
Private since financial data / sponsoring is being discussed.
akademy-talks
Discussions among the programme committee are traditionally private among that
committee.
On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 16:07:48 Myriam Schweingruber wrote:
So IMHO these lists should be visible in the mailiman/listinfo, with a
description. There already is a lot of criticism about hidden mailing
lists with unknown agendas among the KDE community, a minimum of
transparency about what
On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 17:39:52 Myriam Schweingruber wrote:
I am a moderator for several mailing lists, some of these for the fsfe
and those have most likely an equal amount of spam traffic than KDE
lists. Worse even for the 3 mailing lists I moderate in the *ubuntu
space, it sometimes
On Sunday, May 13, 2012 12:20:00 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
You probably don't have any bit of user mentallity left in your head,
I think everybody is served better by discussions that do not engage in
personal attacks. Let us please try to keep it respectful and technical, and
avoid ad-hominem
On May 9, 2012, 6:30 p.m., Mark Gaiser wrote:
Ehh optional perhaps?
I've seen forms behave like this before and back then when i first saw it i
tried to delete the text.. Which obviously didn't happen. The text just
disappears as soon as i start typing. I kinda dislike that behavior.
optional, but please not by default. This is just my opinion and i
don't maintain plasma components (nor anything in KDE for that matter).
You'd have to wait for a reply from some of the plasma component
maintainers to get a final word on this.
Sebastian Kügler wrote:
This just fixes
or let me know so I'll do it
for you.
- Sebastian Kügler
On May 9, 2012, 4:41 p.m., Sebastian Gottfried wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104893
On Thursday, May 03, 2012 19:52:55 Andre Heinecke wrote:
Btw. nepomuk based file search is not going to be an option for company
networks for a long time or ever. Imagine the Upgrade, every user indexes
everything for themself,.. Afaik The semantic desktop as it is currently
designed is for
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104821/s/554/
Thanks,
Sebastian Kügler
On Thursday, May 03, 2012 19:35:00 Mark Gaiser wrote:
Let me first say that i have absolutely nothing to say about this. I do have
an opinion about this though. I would not like this. If i'm searching i
just want to search and certainly don't get a dialog just to confirm my
search.
Others
for bookmarks
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104821/s/554/
Thanks,
Sebastian Kügler
true, so it isn't caught by the
m_loadedOk guard.) If anyone has suggestions how to handle these kinds of
silent failures, they would be most welcome :)
Thanks,
Sebastian Kügler
://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104821/s/554/
Thanks,
Sebastian Kügler
On Thursday, April 05, 2012 00:32:19 Mike Dean wrote:
As an electrical engineer, I find this idea sound. With a low sampling
rate, such as 0.5 Hz (once every 2 seconds), the additional power draw
should be negligible. 1/60th Hz is far too slow to produce enough quality
for users to
.
Or am I missing something here?
- Sebastian Kügler
On March 26, 2012, 6:04 p.m., Lamarque Vieira Souza wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104417
, that shouldn't be
necessary in the first place.
- Sebastian Kügler
On March 26, 2012, 6:04 p.m., Lamarque Vieira Souza wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104417
Hey Łukasz,
On Monday, January 23, 2012 17:40:00 Łukasz Spas wrote:
I've got an idea of new KDE project (if this idea was already discussed
somewhere here - I'm sorry, just ignore this message).
I would like to implement library which will allow you to run KDE
applications on one machine
On Tuesday, January 17, 2012 05:17:25 Dario Freddi wrote:
this mail comes after a certain discussion on how to handle screen
inhibition. At the moment, the aforementioned function leads to an
inhibition of DPMS features and brightness handling - I propose to
change that to include also
On Wednesday, January 11, 2012 17:47:00 Shaun Reich wrote:
Prompting motion for making Qt 4.8 a hard dependency for KDE
4.9/master. Currently kde-baseapps/plasma/folderview does not build
against 4.7 due to an (albeit minor) api usage.
Not sure how other areas in KDE fair against this, most
701 - 800 of 880 matches
Mail list logo
