On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 23:14:01 Dawit A wrote: > Well that is not entirely correct. We can definitely implement support for > private mode in the cookiejar itself easily. There are a couple of > approaches we can take. The difficult part has always been how to handle > the "private session" cookies in the cookie management dialogs. Anyhow, I > promised to try and implement this for 4.10, but I could not find the time. > Perhaps I will find some time during the upcoming holidays.
Is this the same issue that we can't set an empty cookiejar on the webview? This issue bit me a while ago when using kdewebkit for an oauth implementation, I need an empty cookiejar there because I don't want to authenticate an already logged in user. This didn't seem possible, and I think the problem still exists. afiestas ran into the same issue. Or maybe I'm confusing this? :) -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
