Re: KDE/Qt Flatpak SDK/Runtime

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Matthias Kuhn wrote: > On 11/16/2016 04:02 PM, Aleix Pol wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Matthias Kuhn wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm a developer of QGIS [1] which makes heavy use of Qt libraries. I was >>> very

Re: KDE/Qt Flatpak SDK/Runtime

On 11/16/2016 04:02 PM, Aleix Pol wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Matthias Kuhn wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm a developer of QGIS [1] which makes heavy use of Qt libraries. I was >> very happy to see the work on a KDE flatpak repository which already >> packages Qt [2].

Re: KDE/Qt Flatpak SDK/Runtime

On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Matthias Kuhn wrote: > Hi, > > I'm a developer of QGIS [1] which makes heavy use of Qt libraries. I was > very happy to see the work on a KDE flatpak repository which already > packages Qt [2]. > > I have recently been looking into a couple

Re: KDE/Qt Flatpak SDK/Runtime

On Dienstag, 15. November 2016 18:00:34 CET Aleix Pol wrote: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Matthias Kuhn wrote: > > I would like to see how much pyqt increases the size of the (not yet > optimized) runtime. I agree it can be interesting, but I'm not sure by > how much.

Re: KDE/Qt Flatpak SDK/Runtime

On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Matthias Kuhn wrote: > Hi Aleix, > > Thanks for the quick feedback > > On 11/15/2016 12:44 AM, Aleix Pol wrote: >> Hi Matthias, >> Really happy to see there's interest! >> >> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Matthias Kuhn

Re: KDE/Qt Flatpak SDK/Runtime

Hi Aleix, Thanks for the quick feedback On 11/15/2016 12:44 AM, Aleix Pol wrote: > Hi Matthias, > Really happy to see there's interest! > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Matthias Kuhn wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm a developer of QGIS [1] which makes heavy use of Qt libraries.

Re: KDE/Qt Flatpak SDK/Runtime

Hi Matthias, Really happy to see there's interest! On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Matthias Kuhn wrote: > Hi, > > I'm a developer of QGIS [1] which makes heavy use of Qt libraries. I was > very happy to see the work on a KDE flatpak repository which already > packages Qt

Re: KDE/Qt Flatpak SDK/Runtime

Hi Jan, I agree that not everything should be in there. That's why I didn't list dependencies like postgres, proj4, geos, gdal and many more. The main goal I have here is to minimize the maintenance overhead by finding the best way to generalize runtimes. E.g. QtLocation is a core Qt module, so

Re: KDE/Qt Flatpak SDK/Runtime

Hi Jan, I agree that not everything should be in there. That's why I didn't list dependencies like postgres, proj4, geos, gdal and many more. The main goal I have here is to minimize the maintenance overhead by finding the best way to generalize runtimes. E.g. QtLocation is a core Qt module, so

Re: KDE/Qt Flatpak SDK/Runtime

Hi, if you add your additional dependencies which are not in KDE's flatpak runtime currently, then I guess it won't have any difference for your users. They will either have to download a runtime requiring more space or an app bundle/repo requiring extra space due to QtLocation, QCA and so on.

KDE/Qt Flatpak SDK/Runtime

Hi, I'm a developer of QGIS [1] which makes heavy use of Qt libraries. I was very happy to see the work on a KDE flatpak repository which already packages Qt [2]. I have recently been looking into a couple of different approaches to ship app bundles and flatpak sounds like a very interesting