---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128968/
---
(Updated Sept. 22, 2016, 2:14 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128968/#review99396
---
Ship it!
Inviala!
- Luigi Toscano
On Set. 21, 2016, 11:
> On Set. 21, 2016, 12:38 p.m., Luigi Toscano wrote:
> > Would it make more sense to change meinproc5 to work like checkXML5 if
> > invoked with that name (hardlink, copy, etc, a-la busybox)?
>
> Ralf Habacker wrote:
> Sorry, I do not know the reasons why this tool has been created and has
> On Sept. 21, 2016, 12:38 nachm., Luigi Toscano wrote:
> > Would it make more sense to change meinproc5 to work like checkXML5 if
> > invoked with that name (hardlink, copy, etc, a-la busybox)?
>
> Ralf Habacker wrote:
> Sorry, I do not know the reasons why this tool has been created and h
> On Sept. 21, 2016, 12:38 p.m., Luigi Toscano wrote:
> > Would it make more sense to change meinproc5 to work like checkXML5 if
> > invoked with that name (hardlink, copy, etc, a-la busybox)?
>
> Ralf Habacker wrote:
> Sorry, I do not know the reasons why this tool has been created and has
> On Sept. 21, 2016, 12:38 nachm., Luigi Toscano wrote:
> > Would it make more sense to change meinproc5 to work like checkXML5 if
> > invoked with that name (hardlink, copy, etc, a-la busybox)?
Sorry, I do not know the reasons why this tool has been created and has not
been integrated into me
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128968/#review99350
---
Would it make more sense to change meinproc5 to work like che