On Feb. 21, 2014, 6:29 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote:
I understand Ivan point of view. Now I'm wondering about something: Are we
sure the situation will be the same in the future for a 5 to 6 transition?
I don't think we can be 100% sure and so we might want to start versioning
to be
On Friday, 2014-02-21, 08:30:02, Kevin Ottens wrote:
Hello,
On Thursday 20 February 2014 20:03:20 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
I ran into an interesting situation the other day with libkactivities: it
uses KDBusConnectionPool to create connections in a thread-safe manner.
KDBusConnectionPool
On Feb. 21, 2014, 6:29 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote:
I understand Ivan point of view. Now I'm wondering about something: Are we
sure the situation will be the same in the future for a 5 to 6 transition?
I don't think we can be 100% sure and so we might want to start versioning
to be
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115827/#review50455
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kevin Ottens
On Feb. 21, 2014, 7:35
On Friday, February 21, 2014 08:30:02 Kevin Ottens wrote:
Hello,
On Thursday 20 February 2014 20:03:20 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
I ran into an interesting situation the other day with libkactivities: it
uses KDBusConnectionPool to create connections in a thread-safe manner.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115827/
---
(Updated Feb. 21, 2014, 10:23 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115827/#review50456
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115908/
---
(Updated Feb. 21, 2014, 10:28 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115908/#review50457
---
This review has been submitted with commit
On Feb. 20, 2014, 10:46 a.m., Alex Merry wrote:
Can you describe the problem this fixes? Are the tests directly using
these libraries somehow?
Adrián Chaves Fernández wrote:
If I build with these steps:
mkdir -p build cd build
cmake ../kxmlgui-4.96.0 \
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115742/#review50460
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Alex Merry
On Feb. 20, 2014, 4:27
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115775/#review50461
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115816/#review50462
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115816/
---
(Updated Feb. 21, 2014, 11:19 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115896/#review50464
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115896/#review50465
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115896/
---
(Updated Feb. 21, 2014, 11:21 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115896/#review50463
---
This review has been submitted with commit
Hi,
Going through the information we have in kde-runtime [1] we found there are
two subdirectories related to localization (localization and l10n) that we
couldn't find a correct place to move to.
Can anybody give us a hand and help us figure those out?
- localization: has plenty of information
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115207/
---
(Updated Feb. 21, 2014, 12:26 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115932/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Martin Gräßlin.
Repository:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115207/#review50466
---
src/lib/kaboutdata.h
Hi ...
So, the next fun thing I’ve run into is desktoptojson. Currently in Sprinter
I’m just hand writing the json files for the plugins. However, in its TODO file
is this:
* Metadata
* localization/i18n in plugin metadata (name, description)
* license
* author information (name,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115932/#review50468
---
the approach looks good to me, just two small requests:
*
Aaron J. SeigoOn Friday, February 21, 2014 13:41:29 wrote:
What are the plans for i18n in desktoptojson? It currently does not catch
any translations in the .desktop file.
actually, i think it might be worse than “does not catch any translations”: if
it does what i suspect it does, it takes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115840/
---
(Updated Feb. 21, 2014, 12:56 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115840/#review50469
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115207/
---
(Updated Feb. 21, 2014, 2:03 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
On Friday, February 21, 2014 13:57:07 Kevin Krammer wrote:
If we want to be able to parse .desktop files without KConfig, we need a
desktop file parser.
valuable to know, indeed. thanks for sharing your experience, saves me some
effort.
The Razor-Qt and LxQt people might have one already.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115909/#review50475
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Sebastian Kügler
On Feb. 20, 2014,
On Feb. 21, 2014, 7:35 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote:
autotests/kconfigtest.cpp, line 219
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115875/diff/1/?file=244867#file244867line219
Hm we're loosing the test mode for QStandardPaths, I don't think that's
desirable.
It is done inside
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115936/
---
(Updated Feb. 21, 2014, 4:58 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and
32 matches
Mail list logo
