Re: LGPL for Breeze QStyle and qtquickcontrols?

On Monday, June 6, 2016 1:29:51 PM CEST Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > On 6 June 2016 at 13:04, Martin Graesslin wrote: > > On Monday, June 6, 2016 12:17:11 PM CEST Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > > On 30 May 2016 at 17:11, Michael Pyne wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 30,

Re: LGPL for Breeze QStyle and qtquickcontrols?

On 6 June 2016 at 13:04, Martin Graesslin wrote: > On Monday, June 6, 2016 12:17:11 PM CEST Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > On 30 May 2016 at 17:11, Michael Pyne wrote: > > > On Mon, May 30, 2016 14:42:43 Martin Graesslin wrote: > > > > On Saturday, May 28, 2016

Re: LGPL for Breeze QStyle and qtquickcontrols?

On Monday, June 6, 2016 12:17:11 PM CEST Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > On 30 May 2016 at 17:11, Michael Pyne wrote: > > On Mon, May 30, 2016 14:42:43 Martin Graesslin wrote: > > > On Saturday, May 28, 2016 11:24:52 PM CEST Michael Pyne wrote: > > > > On Sat, May 28, 2016 14:53:54

Re: LGPL for Breeze QStyle and qtquickcontrols?

On 06/06/2016 12:17 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: On 30 May 2016 at 17:11, Michael Pyne > wrote: On Mon, May 30, 2016 14:42:43 Martin Graesslin wrote: > On Saturday, May 28, 2016 11:24:52 PM CEST Michael Pyne wrote: > > On Sat, May 28, 2016

Re: LGPL for Breeze QStyle and qtquickcontrols?

On 30 May 2016 at 17:11, Michael Pyne wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2016 14:42:43 Martin Graesslin wrote: > > On Saturday, May 28, 2016 11:24:52 PM CEST Michael Pyne wrote: > > > On Sat, May 28, 2016 14:53:54 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > > > All in all, If nobody just noted an issue

Re: LGPL for Breeze QStyle and qtquickcontrols?

On Mon, May 30, 2016 14:42:43 Martin Graesslin wrote: > On Saturday, May 28, 2016 11:24:52 PM CEST Michael Pyne wrote: > > On Sat, May 28, 2016 14:53:54 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > > All in all, If nobody just noted an issue with the licensing above maybe > > > nobody tried to place/distribute a

Re: LGPL for Breeze QStyle and qtquickcontrols?

On Saturday, May 28, 2016 11:24:52 PM CEST Michael Pyne wrote: > On Sat, May 28, 2016 14:53:54 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > All in all, If nobody just noted an issue with the licensing above maybe > > nobody tried to place/distribute a non-GPL software on top of Plasma? That > > would be the worst

Re: LGPL for Breeze QStyle and qtquickcontrols?

On 05/30/2016 12:33 AM, Aleix Pol wrote: On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Martin Graesslin wrote: On Sunday, May 22, 2016 12:22:28 AM CEST Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: So we, in KDE, lack LGPL style code for our de-facto official look and feel. This is the crucial point.

Re: LGPL for Breeze QStyle and qtquickcontrols?

On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Martin Graesslin wrote: > On Sunday, May 22, 2016 12:22:28 AM CEST Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: >> So we, in KDE, lack LGPL style code for our de-facto official look and feel. > > This is the crucial point. Breeze is not the de-facto official look

Re: LGPL for Breeze QStyle and qtquickcontrols?

On Sat, May 28, 2016 14:53:54 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > All in all, If nobody just noted an issue with the licensing above maybe > nobody tried to place/distribute a non-GPL software on top of Plasma? That > would be the worst news of all to me. > > Please speak up someone else because it's a

Re: LGPL for Breeze QStyle and qtquickcontrols?

On 23 May 2016 at 09:38, Martin Graesslin wrote: > On Sunday, May 22, 2016 12:22:28 AM CEST Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > So we, in KDE, lack LGPL style code for our de-facto official look and > feel. > > This is the crucial point. Breeze is not the de-facto official look and >

Re: LGPL for Breeze QStyle and qtquickcontrols?

On Sunday, May 22, 2016 12:22:28 AM CEST Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > So we, in KDE, lack LGPL style code for our de-facto official look and feel. This is the crucial point. Breeze is not the de-facto official look and feel of KDE. It's the look and feel of Plasma. Applications shouldn't use it.

Re: LGPL for Breeze QStyle and qtquickcontrols?

On 18 May 2016 at 17:51, Martin Graesslin wrote: > On Wednesday, May 18, 2016 12:41:49 PM CEST Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > On 17 May 2016 at 20:38, Martin Graesslin wrote: > > > On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 6:23:10 PM CEST Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > > > > If

Re: LGPL for Breeze QStyle and qtquickcontrols?

On Wednesday, May 18, 2016 12:41:49 PM CEST Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > On 17 May 2016 at 20:38, Martin Graesslin wrote: > > On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 6:23:10 PM CEST Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > > > If you show me why it needs to be a framework and I agree with it, > > > > I

Re: LGPL for Breeze QStyle and qtquickcontrols?

On 17 May 2016 at 20:38, Martin Graesslin wrote: > On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 6:23:10 PM CEST Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > > If you show me why it needs to be a framework and I agree with it, > > > I might be willing to consider to allow to relicense the code I wrote > for > > >

Re: LGPL for Breeze QStyle and qtquickcontrols?

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Hugo Pereira Da Costa wrote: > On 05/18/2016 11:13 AM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > > > On 17 May 2016 at 20:48, Hugo Pereira Da Costa > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> [snip] >>> >>> >>> Architecturally,

Re: LGPL for Breeze QStyle and qtquickcontrols?

On 17 May 2016 at 20:48, Hugo Pereira Da Costa < hugo.pereira.da.co...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > [snip] > >> >> ​Architecturally, the eventual solution would be that breeze.git becomes >> layered, and routines beyond what QStyle defines are provided by an LGPL >> lib. It worked with libOxygen

Re: LGPL for Breeze QStyle and qtquickcontrols?

Hi, [snip] ​Architecturally, the eventual solution would be that breeze.git becomes layered, and routines beyond what QStyle defines are provided by an LGPL lib. It worked with libOxygen that is LGPL. The reason for liboxygen was that part of Oxygen was also used by KWin decoration. We fixed

Re: LGPL for Breeze QStyle and qtquickcontrols?

On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 6:23:10 PM CEST Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > If you show me why it needs to be a framework and I agree with it, > > I might be willing to consider to allow to relicense the code I wrote for > > it. > > There's no request to make it framework from me. LGPLing Breeze does

Re: LGPL for Breeze QStyle and qtquickcontrols?

On 17 May 2016 at 15:02, Martin Graesslin wrote: > On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 2:21:43 PM CEST Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > On 9 May 2016 at 07:53, Martin Graesslin wrote: > > > On Saturday, May 7, 2016 10:10:50 PM CEST Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > > > Hi, > >

Re: LGPL for Breeze QStyle and qtquickcontrols?

On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 2:21:43 PM CEST Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > On 9 May 2016 at 07:53, Martin Graesslin wrote: > > On Saturday, May 7, 2016 10:10:50 PM CEST Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > > Hi, > > > Is relicensing Breeze QStyle to LGPL from GPL for possible and > > > >

Re: LGPL for Breeze QStyle and qtquickcontrols?

On 9 May 2016 at 07:53, Martin Graesslin wrote: > On Saturday, May 7, 2016 10:10:50 PM CEST Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > Hi, > > Is relicensing Breeze QStyle to LGPL from GPL for possible and > acceptable? > > I've found cases when bits of the code beyond QStyle/KStyle API

Re: LGPL for Breeze QStyle and qtquickcontrols?

On Monday, 9 May 2016, Martin Graesslin wrote: > On Saturday, May 7, 2016 10:10:50 PM CEST Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: >> Hi, >> Is relicensing Breeze QStyle to LGPL from GPL for possible and acceptable? >> I've found cases when bits of the code beyond QStyle/KStyle API need >> to

Re: LGPL for Breeze QStyle and qtquickcontrols?

On Saturday, May 7, 2016 10:10:50 PM CEST Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > Hi, > Is relicensing Breeze QStyle to LGPL from GPL for possible and acceptable? > I've found cases when bits of the code beyond QStyle/KStyle API need > to be reused. One example is: custom widgets. > If we're considering Breeze