> On Oct. 16, 2016, 4:12 p.m., Tobias Berner wrote:
> > I'm kind of unsure if this is right. Yes, the tests run now, but isn't the
> > issue rather in the way kpty works (or fails to work on FreeBSD)?
>
> Gleb Popov wrote:
> From what i've understood, this boils down to
>
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129197/#review100148
---
autotests/kptyprocesstest.cpp (line 123)
> On Oct. 16, 2016, 1:12 p.m., Tobias Berner wrote:
> > I'm kind of unsure if this is right. Yes, the tests run now, but isn't the
> > issue rather in the way kpty works (or fails to work on FreeBSD)?
>
> Gleb Popov wrote:
> From what i've understood, this boils down to
>
> On Oct. 16, 2016, 4:12 p.m., Tobias Berner wrote:
> > I'm kind of unsure if this is right. Yes, the tests run now, but isn't the
> > issue rather in the way kpty works (or fails to work on FreeBSD)?
>From what i've understood, this boils down to
>`KPtyDevicePrivate::_k_canRead()` method in
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129197/#review100039
---
I'm kind of unsure if this is right. Yes, the tests run
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129197/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks, Adriaan de Groot, Tobias Berner, Oswald
