Hi there,
have a small glitch with icon loading on frameworks. If I understand
correctly, the migration path for KIcon is QIcon::fromTheme, right?
Unfortunately this is giving me empty results, which might be caused by
QIcon::themeName() giving me empty string. If I configure the theme
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 14:10:56 Ben Cooksley wrote:
I do have some reservations as to the name of quite a few of those
repositories however as they are very generic - and thus tread on common
namespace. Suggestions are welcome.
In case anyone wonders, here's the full list of frameworks:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 9:37 PM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 14:10:56 Ben Cooksley wrote:
I do have some reservations as to the name of quite a few of those
repositories however as they are very generic - and thus tread on common
namespace. Suggestions are
[: Aleix Pol :]
FWIW, how could this have worked before? :/
There was an initial patch, then some weeks of hiatus and discussion, and
then it was committed very recently as a stop-gap measure. Probably
something got lost in the process.
--
Chusslove Illich (Часлав Илић)
signature.asc
/karchive contains the itemviews data
karchive$ ls
autotests CMakeLists.txt COPYING COPYING.LIB KF5ItemViewsConfig.cmake.in
Mainpage.dox src tests
it installs the following files:
/opt/qt5/include/KF5/itemviews_export.h
/opt/qt5/include/KF5/itemviews_version.h
Hi Treeve,
It seems that I may have mis-pushed this repository.
I have now adjusted it's contents with what is supposed to be the KArchive
repository - can you please check?
Thanks,
Ben
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 21:40:48 Ben Cooksley wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 9:37 PM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 14:10:56 Ben Cooksley wrote:
I do have some reservations as to the name of quite a few of those
repositories however as they are very
On 17/12/13 08:37, David Faure wrote:
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 14:10:56 Ben Cooksley wrote:
I do have some reservations as to the name of quite a few of those
repositories however as they are very generic - and thus tread on common
namespace. Suggestions are welcome.
In case anyone
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 18:17:59 +0100, Kevin Ottens wrote:
Hello,
On Monday 16 December 2013 15:16:42 Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
Do you want us to add ourselves as contacts in the table or do you
plan to
fill it later? If the former, I would assign myself to Get the
dependency
graph generator script
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Alex Merry k...@randomguy3.me.uk wrote:
On 17/12/13 08:37, David Faure wrote:
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 14:10:56 Ben Cooksley wrote:
I do have some reservations as to the name of quite a few of those
repositories however as they are very generic - and
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 22:37:09 Ben Cooksley wrote:
Hi Treeve,
It seems that I may have mis-pushed this repository.
I have now adjusted it's contents with what is supposed to be the KArchive
repository - can you please check?
Thanks,
Ben
fixed now, and kio also builds against it
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114496/#review45848
---
Ship it!
This should go in before the split, since it affects
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:59 PM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 21:40:48 Ben Cooksley wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 9:37 PM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 14:10:56 Ben Cooksley wrote:
I do have some reservations as to the
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 11:17:35 +0100, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 18:17:59 +0100, Kevin Ottens wrote:
Regarding the split: what is going to happen to the frameworks
branch of the
kdelibs repository after the split? Is it going to be removed or is
it
going to stay there with the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114496/#review45853
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114496/
---
(Updated Dec. 17, 2013, 10:35 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
See http://build.kde.org/job/kdelibs_frameworks_qt5/1870/changes
Changes:
[faure] Rename kdewidgets to kdesignerplugin
--
[...truncated 304 lines...]
-- Looking for include file sys/time.h - found
-- Looking for include file arpa/nameser_compat.h
--
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 23:27:39 Ben Cooksley wrote:
Other than apidox, I was also concerned about frameworkintegration,
itemmodels, itemviews and dnssd. The rest of the names are quite
descriptive as to what they contain and are fine.
Yeah, itemmodels and itemviews often come up as not
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114502/
---
(Updated Dec. 17, 2013, 10:42 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114502/#review45854
---
This review has been submitted with commit
See http://build.kde.org/job/kdelibs_frameworks_qt5/1871/changes
Changes:
[agateau] KDE4_ENABLE_EXCEPTIONS = KDE_ENABLE_EXCEPTIONS
[agateau] Fix line endings
--
[...truncated 303 lines...]
-- Looking for include file sys/time.h - found
-- Looking for
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:39 AM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 23:27:39 Ben Cooksley wrote:
Other than apidox, I was also concerned about frameworkintegration,
itemmodels, itemviews and dnssd. The rest of the names are quite
descriptive as to what they
On Dec. 17, 2013, 10:35 a.m., Commit Hook wrote:
This review has been submitted with commit
dea0dcccb922e528a1c2f2a2bd3a102cf756d3e9 by David Faure on behalf of Alex
Merry to branch frameworks.
Thanks!
- Alex
---
This is an
On Dec. 15, 2013, 9:22 p.m., Kevin Ottens wrote:
It is in fact intended that way as kguiaddons isn't supposed to include
stuff coming from kcoreaddons (yeah I know it's slightly convoluted in that
particular case).
Albert Astals Cid wrote:
So basically we have a header that when
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 23:27:39 Ben Cooksley wrote:
Other than apidox, I was also concerned about frameworkintegration,
itemmodels, itemviews and dnssd.
Let's rename the repos to kitemmodels, kitemviews and kdnssd,
this will be in line with karchive and most others (this doesn't change the
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 13:25:02 +0100, David Faure wrote:
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 23:27:39 Ben Cooksley wrote:
Other than apidox, I was also concerned about frameworkintegration,
itemmodels, itemviews and dnssd.
Let's rename the repos to kitemmodels, kitemviews and kdnssd,
this will be in
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Michal Humpula michal.hump...@seznam.czwrote:
Hi there,
have a small glitch with icon loading on frameworks. If I understand
correctly, the migration path for KIcon is QIcon::fromTheme, right?
Unfortunately this is giving me empty results, which might be
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114512/#review45866
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- David Faure
On Dec. 16, 2013, 9:13
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114512/
---
(Updated Dec. 17, 2013, 2:52 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114512/#review45868
---
This review has been submitted with commit
On Dec. 17, 2013, 2:50 p.m., David Faure wrote:
Ship It!
Except I can't, because of Ben's push blocking :-)
- Alex
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114512/#review45866
On 17/12/13 12:57, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
I guess the question is - what does this module actually bring. I
assume, a consistent look-n-feel for KDE-produced api docs, right?
Yes. It also goes a bit further by doing things like generating menus
in the sidebar and handling cross-doxygen
Thanks Aleix! The KDE_FULL_SESSION=true fixed the thing:)
Would be nice to add it to the list of variables in Runtime setup section at
http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Building. I've completely missed it in
Running unit tests one:)
Cheers
Michal
On Tuesday 17 of December 2013 14:56:46 Aleix
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114518/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kdelibs
Description
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 14:52:56 Alex Merry wrote:
Except I can't, because of Ben's push blocking :-)
Aurélien, Kévin and I have superpowers :)
Stuff that needs moving between frameworks, or renaming actual frameworks, is
a lot easier to handle before splitting, so we're doing that today,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114518/#review45870
---
tier4/kde4support/KF5KDE4SupportConfig.cmake.in:60 also need a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114518/
---
(Updated Dec. 17, 2013, 4:10 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114518/
---
(Updated Dec. 17, 2013, 4:29 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
On 17/12/13 15:26, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 14:54:44 +, Alex Merry wrote:
On 17/12/13 12:57, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
I guess the question is - what does this module actually bring. I
assume, a consistent look-n-feel for KDE-produced api docs, right?
Yes. It also goes a
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 14:54:44 +, Alex Merry wrote:
On 17/12/13 12:57, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
I guess the question is - what does this module actually bring. I
assume, a consistent look-n-feel for KDE-produced api docs, right?
Yes. It also goes a bit further by doing things like generating
On 17/12/13 15:31, Alex Merry wrote:
On 17/12/13 15:26, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 14:54:44 +, Alex Merry wrote:
On 17/12/13 12:57, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
I guess the question is - what does this module actually bring. I
assume, a consistent look-n-feel for KDE-produced
On Monday 16 December 2013 23:30:15 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Monday, December 16, 2013 19:30:25 Martin Graesslin wrote:
On Monday 16 December 2013 19:01:25 David Edmundson wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Martin Graesslin mgraess...@kde.org
On Monday 16 December 2013
On Dec. 15, 2013, 9:22 p.m., Kevin Ottens wrote:
It is in fact intended that way as kguiaddons isn't supposed to include
stuff coming from kcoreaddons (yeah I know it's slightly convoluted in that
particular case).
Albert Astals Cid wrote:
So basically we have a header that when
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 11:32:46 Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 11:17:35 +0100, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 18:17:59 +0100, Kevin Ottens wrote:
Regarding the split: what is going to happen to the frameworks
branch of the
kdelibs repository after the split?
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114521/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kdelibs
Description
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114522/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kdelibs
Description
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114518/
---
(Updated Dec. 17, 2013, 5:57 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114521/#review45876
---
tier2/dnssd/src/CMakeLists.txt
On Dec. 15, 2013, 9:22 p.m., Kevin Ottens wrote:
It is in fact intended that way as kguiaddons isn't supposed to include
stuff coming from kcoreaddons (yeah I know it's slightly convoluted in that
particular case).
Albert Astals Cid wrote:
So basically we have a header that when
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114521/
---
(Updated Dec. 17, 2013, 7:11 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
On Dec. 17, 2013, 6:14 p.m., Christophe Giboudeaux wrote:
tier2/dnssd/src/CMakeLists.txt, line 85
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114521/diff/1/?file=226373#file226373line85
dnssd or kdnssd for headers ? (same thing line 89)
If you choose the later, the camelcased
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114522/
---
(Updated Dec. 17, 2013, 7:21 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114521/
---
(Updated Dec. 17, 2013, 7 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114522/#review45886
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Christophe Giboudeaux
On Dec. 17,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114521/#review45884
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Christophe Giboudeaux
On Dec. 17,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114522/#review45887
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114521/#review45885
---
This review has been submitted with commit
See http://build.kde.org/job/plasma-framework_master_qt5/970/changes
Changes:
[sebas] constness++
--
[...truncated 320 lines...]
Generating units.moc
On Dec. 15, 2013, 9:22 p.m., Kevin Ottens wrote:
It is in fact intended that way as kguiaddons isn't supposed to include
stuff coming from kcoreaddons (yeah I know it's slightly convoluted in that
particular case).
Albert Astals Cid wrote:
So basically we have a header that when
See http://build.kde.org/job/plasma-framework_master_qt5/971/changes
Changes:
[sebas] Fix borders in dialog depending on location
--
[...truncated 320 lines...]
See http://build.kde.org/job/plasma-framework_master_qt5/972/changes
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Martin Klapetek martin.klape...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:39 AM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 23:27:39 Ben Cooksley wrote:
Other than apidox, I was also concerned about frameworkintegration,
itemmodels,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114524/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kdelibs
Description
63 matches
Mail list logo
