Suggestion: create an own framework for KGlobalAccel

2013-12-08 Thread Martin Graesslin
Hi,

at the moment KGlobalAccel is part of XmlGui which I consider semantically
wrong. Global shortcuts have nothing to do with XmlGui and there are quite
some examples for applications which need global shortcuts but do not use xml
gui (e.g. everything in the desktop shell).

My suggestion is to move the following source files into an own framework:
* kglobalaccel.cpp
* kglobalaccel.h
* kglobalaccel_p.h
* kglobalshortcutinfo.cpp
* kglobalshortcutinfo.h
* kglobalshortcutinfo_dbus.cpp
* kglobalshortcutinfo_p.h
* org.kde.kglobalaccel.Component.xml
* org.kde.KGlobalAccel.xml

From checking the source files this would become a tier1 framework as the
dependencies are:
* QtCore
* QtDBus
* QtWidgets
* QtX11Extras

Opinions?

Cheers
Martin

P.S. I blame Aurélien and his diagrams for this proposal. It made me look into
the dependencies of KWin and I had a wtf why are we linking sonnet? moment
and looked into what we used of XmlGui.

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel


Re: Review Request 114328: re-add customstyleelement suite to kstyle

2013-12-08 Thread Commit Hook

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114328/#review45342
---


This review has been submitted with commit 
278f2ed5630e21bba28c3433579405d372b7c89b by Hugo Pereira Da Costa to branch 
frameworks.

- Commit Hook


On Dec. 6, 2013, 2:43 p.m., Hugo Pereira Da Costa wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114328/
 ---
 
 (Updated Dec. 6, 2013, 2:43 p.m.)
 
 
 Review request for KDE Frameworks.
 
 
 Repository: kdelibs
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 re-add customstyleelement suite to kstyle
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   tier4/frameworkintegration/src/kstyle/kstyle.h 8a881f5 
   tier4/frameworkintegration/src/kstyle/kstyle.cpp 27d407e 
 
 Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114328/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 compiles, works, fix kde-workspace build
 also: will be used when moving oxygen from qcommonstyle back to kstyle (right 
 now we have a fork of some of the said methods)
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Hugo Pereira Da Costa
 


___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel


Re: Review Request 114328: re-add customstyleelement suite to kstyle

2013-12-08 Thread Hugo Pereira Da Costa

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114328/
---

(Updated Dec. 8, 2013, 10:24 a.m.)


Status
--

This change has been marked as submitted.


Review request for KDE Frameworks.


Repository: kdelibs


Description
---

re-add customstyleelement suite to kstyle


Diffs
-

  tier4/frameworkintegration/src/kstyle/kstyle.h 8a881f5 
  tier4/frameworkintegration/src/kstyle/kstyle.cpp 27d407e 

Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114328/diff/


Testing
---

compiles, works, fix kde-workspace build
also: will be used when moving oxygen from qcommonstyle back to kstyle (right 
now we have a fork of some of the said methods)


Thanks,

Hugo Pereira Da Costa

___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel


Re: Tier 3 depending between eachother

2013-12-08 Thread David Faure
On Saturday 07 December 2013 17:57:31 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
 Looking at Aurélien's graphs i see that there seem to be a few Tier 3 things
 depending on other Tier 3 things.

Yep, that's perfectly fine, it's the definition of tier3, see the first 
section in http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Policies.

 Why is that? And what's the difference between a Tier 3 thing that depends
 on another Tier 3 thing and a Tier 4 thing?

Tier4 is very special: it's for things that offer additional integration 
automatically (without providing an API, so more like plugins).
And for things which are deprecated and sit on top of everything else.

In other words: pure-KF5 applications shouldn't link to anything from tier4.

The API layer stops at tier3.

-- 
David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr
Working on KDE, in particular KDE Frameworks 5

___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel


Re: Tier 3 depending between eachother

2013-12-08 Thread Hugo Pereira Da Costa

On 12/08/2013 11:46 AM, David Faure wrote:

On Saturday 07 December 2013 17:57:31 Albert Astals Cid wrote:

Looking at Aurélien's graphs i see that there seem to be a few Tier 3 things
depending on other Tier 3 things.

Yep, that's perfectly fine, it's the definition of tier3, see the first
section in http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Policies.


Why is that? And what's the difference between a Tier 3 thing that depends
on another Tier 3 thing and a Tier 4 thing?

Tier4 is very special: it's for things that offer additional integration
automatically (without providing an API, so more like plugins).
And for things which are deprecated and sit on top of everything else.

In other words: pure-KF5 applications shouldn't link to anything from tier4.

mmm. What about kstyle then ? (tier4/frameworkintegration/src/kstyle)
used to make easier kf5 widget styles ? (hence definitly not a plugin)


The API layer stops at tier3.



___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel


Re: Suggestion: create an own framework for KGlobalAccel

2013-12-08 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Diumenge, 8 de desembre de 2013, a les 10:16:36, Martin Graesslin va 
escriure:
 Hi,
 
 at the moment KGlobalAccel is part of XmlGui which I consider semantically
 wrong. Global shortcuts have nothing to do with XmlGui and there are quite
 some examples for applications which need global shortcuts but do not use
 xml gui (e.g. everything in the desktop shell).
 
 My suggestion is to move the following source files into an own framework:
 * kglobalaccel.cpp
 * kglobalaccel.h
 * kglobalaccel_p.h
 * kglobalshortcutinfo.cpp
 * kglobalshortcutinfo.h
 * kglobalshortcutinfo_dbus.cpp
 * kglobalshortcutinfo_p.h
 * org.kde.kglobalaccel.Component.xml
 * org.kde.KGlobalAccel.xml
 
 From checking the source files this would become a tier1 framework as the
 dependencies are:
 * QtCore
 * QtDBus
 * QtWidgets
 * QtX11Extras
 
 Opinions?

Not an oposition but...

Is there no other tier1 framework where it would fit logically and dependency 
wise?

Sometimes I have the fear we might be splitting a bit too much (which can 
result in nightmare for release and package people amonsght otther stuff).

Cheers,
  Albert

 
 Cheers
 Martin
 
 P.S. I blame Aurélien and his diagrams for this proposal. It made me look
 into the dependencies of KWin and I had a wtf why are we linking sonnet?
 moment and looked into what we used of XmlGui.

___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel


Re: Suggestion: create an own framework for KGlobalAccel

2013-12-08 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Sunday 08 December 2013 10:16:36 Martin Graesslin wrote:
 Hi,
 
 at the moment KGlobalAccel is part of XmlGui which I consider semantically
 wrong. Global shortcuts have nothing to do with XmlGui and there are quite
 some examples for applications which need global shortcuts but do not use
 xml gui (e.g. everything in the desktop shell).
 
 My suggestion is to move the following source files into an own framework:
 * kglobalaccel.cpp
 * kglobalaccel.h
 * kglobalaccel_p.h
 * kglobalshortcutinfo.cpp
 * kglobalshortcutinfo.h
 * kglobalshortcutinfo_dbus.cpp
 * kglobalshortcutinfo_p.h
 * org.kde.kglobalaccel.Component.xml
 * org.kde.KGlobalAccel.xml
 
 From checking the source files this would become a tier1 framework as the
 dependencies are:
 * QtCore
 * QtDBus
 * QtWidgets
 * QtX11Extras
 
 Opinions?

It ended up in XmlGui because otherwise we would have a framework with a just 
a pair of public classes. Now I see where you come from from kwin point of 
view, so let's split it out after all.

Now the trick is that we're about to split (pending emptying the patch queue), 
so if you want it please make it happen in the next couple of days.

Regards.
-- 
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net

KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel


Re: Suggestion: create an own framework for KGlobalAccel

2013-12-08 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Sunday 08 December 2013 18:44:59 Martin Graesslin wrote:
 On Sunday 08 December 2013 18:04:45 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
  El Diumenge, 8 de desembre de 2013, a les 10:16:36, Martin Graesslin va
  
  escriure:
   Hi,
   
   at the moment KGlobalAccel is part of XmlGui which I consider
   semantically
   wrong. Global shortcuts have nothing to do with XmlGui and there are
   quite
   some examples for applications which need global shortcuts but do not
   use
   xml gui (e.g. everything in the desktop shell).
   
   My suggestion is to move the following source files into an own
   framework:
   * kglobalaccel.cpp
   * kglobalaccel.h
   * kglobalaccel_p.h
   * kglobalshortcutinfo.cpp
   * kglobalshortcutinfo.h
   * kglobalshortcutinfo_dbus.cpp
   * kglobalshortcutinfo_p.h
   * org.kde.kglobalaccel.Component.xml
   * org.kde.KGlobalAccel.xml
   
   From checking the source files this would become a tier1 framework as
   the
   dependencies are:
   * QtCore
   * QtDBus
   * QtWidgets
   * QtX11Extras
   
   Opinions?
  
  Not an oposition but...
  
  Is there no other tier1 framework where it would fit logically and
  dependency wise?
 
 Probably Kevin or David can better comment on it. For me the only somewhat
 fitting framework would be KWidgetsAddons, but I don't know whether it would
 be OK to have more dependencies in that framework. WidgetsAddons only
 depends on Widgets, but GlobalAccel also needs DBus and X11Extras.

KWidgetsAddons doesn't fit indeed. It has to keep depending on QtWidgets only.
 
Cheers.
-- 
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net

KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel


Re: Review Request 114185: Provide our own KFontDialog

2013-12-08 Thread Aleix Pol Gonzalez

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114185/
---

(Updated Dec. 8, 2013, 5:50 p.m.)


Status
--

This change has been discarded.


Review request for KDE Frameworks.


Repository: kdelibs


Description
---

To brighten a bit further the e-mail I just sent to kde-framewo...@kde.org, 
here I'm making the PlatformTheme to use our KFontDialog, that now it's 
residing in KDE4Support.

I'd say this should result in a new module created, since we don't want to 
depend on KDE4Support, although I can see how we don't want to maintain an ABI 
on those classes, so forking is an option too.


Diffs
-

  tier4/frameworkintegration/CMakeLists.txt 02b3563 
  tier4/frameworkintegration/autotests/CMakeLists.txt f126859 
  tier4/frameworkintegration/src/platformtheme/CMakeLists.txt 5d95c8a 
  tier4/frameworkintegration/src/platformtheme/kdeplatformfontdialoghelper.h 
PRE-CREATION 
  tier4/frameworkintegration/src/platformtheme/kdeplatformfontdialoghelper.cpp 
PRE-CREATION 
  tier4/frameworkintegration/src/platformtheme/kdeplatformtheme.h 69f1f44 
  tier4/frameworkintegration/src/platformtheme/kdeplatformtheme.cpp 010eed4 

Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114185/diff/


Testing
---

Works with the kfontrequestertest.


Thanks,

Aleix Pol Gonzalez

___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel


Re: Review Request 114187: KFormat - Add new KFormat class

2013-12-08 Thread Kevin Ottens


 On Dec. 4, 2013, 7:32 p.m., Kevin Ottens wrote:
  Any chance for an update addressing the comments raised?

John, please update ASAP, it's one of the patch we're waiting for to split.


- Kevin


---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114187/#review45135
---


On Nov. 28, 2013, 8 p.m., John Layt wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114187/
 ---
 
 (Updated Nov. 28, 2013, 8 p.m.)
 
 
 Review request for KDE Frameworks, Albert Astals Cid, David Faure, and Kevin 
 Ottens.
 
 
 Repository: kdelibs
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 KFormat - Add new KFormat class
 
 KLocale offers a number of extra formatting options not yet available
 in Qt.  The KFormat class adds these options to KCoreAddons:
 
 * formatByteSize()
 * formatDuration()
 * formatDecimalDuration()
 * formatSpelloutDuration()
 * formatRelativeDate()
 * formatRelativeDateTime()
 
 The KFormat class can be initialised with any QLocale to use in the
 date and number formatting, or the default locale can be easily
 accessed via KFormat():
 
   QString result = KFormat().formatDuration(1000);
 
 
 
 There's a few things that need looking at here.  The main one is the 
 translation stuff because I had to convert from using ki18n to tr and it may 
 have lost something in the process.  In particular it looks like we'll 
 actually need an en_US translation done to get the plurals right?  If we 
 can't make tr() work for these we'll have to move the class into  k18n.  The 
 second is to look at the formatting options provided and decide if they are 
 actually useful to have.  The third is to confirm that the design is OK, I 
 did think about making these simple static methods with an extra parm for 
 QLocale, but I think this approach offers more future flexibility, and 
 writing KFormat().formatDuration() is just as convenient as 
 KFormat::formatDuration().
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   tier1/kcoreaddons/autotests/CMakeLists.txt 
 c8043576181e7d06663195d017be930d0bdcbde9 
   tier1/kcoreaddons/autotests/kformattest.h PRE-CREATION 
   tier1/kcoreaddons/autotests/kformattest.cpp PRE-CREATION 
   tier1/kcoreaddons/src/lib/CMakeLists.txt 
 638525f7b719bcd0bc1dfdf94debd51296521334 
   tier1/kcoreaddons/src/lib/util/kformat.h PRE-CREATION 
   tier1/kcoreaddons/src/lib/util/kformat.cpp PRE-CREATION 
   tier1/kcoreaddons/src/lib/util/kformatprivate.cpp PRE-CREATION 
   tier1/kcoreaddons/src/lib/util/kformatprivate_p.h PRE-CREATION 
 
 Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114187/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 Autotests copied from KLocale tests and improved.
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 John Layt
 


___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel


Preparing for the split

2013-12-08 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello everyone,

It is now really time to gear up toward the split. So from now on please don't 
create any new patches for the frameworks branch of kdelibs and put all effort 
and priority toward getting the existing open patches in reviewboard properly 
reviewed and pushed. We have to move fast if we want to keep our promise of a 
technology preview in December.

There will be only one exception to this no new patches rule, and that's for 
the patches about the libraries rename started by Martin. Please help him get 
this work completed as soon as possible.

We're almost here, we just need to get all brains focused. Let's make it 
happen!

Thanks for your attention.
Regards.
-- 
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net

KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel


Re: Review Request 114182: Add Kf5 prefix for libs, eg. libKf5Foo

2013-12-08 Thread Kevin Ottens

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114182/#review45360
---

Ship it!


The moves are still not easily reviewable (thank you reviewboard...). But it 
looks mostly good. Let's get it in.

- Kevin Ottens


On Dec. 5, 2013, 5:58 p.m., Martin Klapetek wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114182/
 ---
 
 (Updated Dec. 5, 2013, 5:58 p.m.)
 
 
 Review request for KDE Frameworks.
 
 
 Repository: kdelibs
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 This is just one framework - KConfig - if this is the proper way to do this, 
 I'll update this review with all frameworks updated to this.
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   tier1/itemviews/tests/CMakeLists.txt 4ddf5d8 
   tier1/itemviews/src/CMakeLists.txt bad773c 
   tier1/itemviews/autotests/CMakeLists.txt 0219900 
   tier1/itemviews/KF5ItemViewsConfig.cmake.in PRE-CREATION 
   tier1/itemviews/ItemViewsConfig.cmake.in 1956453 
   tier1/itemviews/CMakeLists.txt 1bdadac 
   tier1/itemmodels/src/CMakeLists.txt 86b48cf 
   tier1/itemmodels/autotests/proxymodeltestapp/CMakeLists.txt 525c9f3 
   tier1/itemmodels/autotests/CMakeLists.txt 03daf70 
   tier1/itemmodels/KF5ItemModelsConfig.cmake.in PRE-CREATION 
   tier1/itemmodels/ItemModelsConfig.cmake.in 4ac98f3 
   tier1/itemmodels/CMakeLists.txt d0be692 
   tier1/karchive/CMakeLists.txt f0d12ac 
   tier1/karchive/KArchiveConfig.cmake.in 40fa614 
   tier1/karchive/KF5ArchiveConfig.cmake.in PRE-CREATION 
   tier1/karchive/autotests/CMakeLists.txt a2cfabe 
   tier1/karchive/examples/helloworld/CMakeLists.txt 2e90094 
   tier1/karchive/examples/tarlocalfiles/CMakeLists.txt b855caf 
   tier1/karchive/src/CMakeLists.txt 767140a 
   tier1/karchive/tests/CMakeLists.txt d804cd2 
   tier1/kcodecs/CMakeLists.txt a8217d0 
   tier1/kcodecs/KCodecsConfig.cmake.in ea632ce 
   tier1/kcodecs/KF5CodecsConfig.cmake.in PRE-CREATION 
   tier1/kcodecs/autotests/CMakeLists.txt bf393f8 
   tier1/kcodecs/src/CMakeLists.txt 152bc8e 
   tier1/kconfig/CMakeLists.txt af91aa2 
   tier1/kconfig/KConfigConfig.cmake.in 5d9d7eb 
   tier1/kconfig/KConfigMacros.cmake ec354a9 
   tier1/kconfig/KF5ConfigConfig.cmake.in PRE-CREATION 
   tier1/kconfig/KF5ConfigMacros.cmake PRE-CREATION 
   tier1/kconfig/autotests/CMakeLists.txt cc2626b 
   tier1/kconfig/autotests/kconfig_compiler/CMakeLists.txt 184ab17 
   tier1/kconfig/src/core/CMakeLists.txt c8a4842 
   tier1/kconfig/src/gui/CMakeLists.txt b677d03 
   tier1/kconfig/src/kconf_update/CMakeLists.txt 69668bc 
   tier1/kconfig/src/kconfig_compiler/CMakeLists.txt 19d86d4 
   tier1/kcoreaddons/CMakeLists.txt 5d2b4a8 
   tier1/kcoreaddons/KCoreAddonsConfig.cmake.in a53be5f 
   tier1/kcoreaddons/KF5CoreAddonsConfig.cmake.in PRE-CREATION 
   tier1/kcoreaddons/autotests/CMakeLists.txt c804357 
   tier1/kcoreaddons/src/lib/CMakeLists.txt 638525f 
   tier1/kcoreaddons/tests/CMakeLists.txt c79d0ba 
   tier1/kdbusaddons/CMakeLists.txt 78cc443 
   tier1/kdbusaddons/KDBusAddonsConfig.cmake.in 27a6060 
   tier1/kdbusaddons/KF5DBusAddonsConfig.cmake.in PRE-CREATION 
   tier1/kdbusaddons/autotests/CMakeLists.txt 92c9151 
   tier1/kdbusaddons/src/CMakeLists.txt 71dc290 
   tier1/kdbusaddons/tests/CMakeLists.txt 684fee3 
   tier1/kguiaddons/CMakeLists.txt b3f378d 
   tier1/kguiaddons/KF5GuiAddonsConfig.cmake.in PRE-CREATION 
   tier1/kguiaddons/KGuiAddonsConfig.cmake.in 83e4c91 
   tier1/kguiaddons/autotests/CMakeLists.txt 2e4a6bb 
   tier1/kguiaddons/src/CMakeLists.txt ca94f4b 
   tier1/kguiaddons/tests/CMakeLists.txt 754b460 
   tier1/kidletime/CMakeLists.txt 61ba25b 
   tier1/kidletime/KF5IdleTimeConfig.cmake.in PRE-CREATION 
   tier1/kidletime/KIdleTimeConfig.cmake.in ace9e8a 
   tier1/kidletime/examples/CMakeLists.txt c88a6c3 
   tier1/kidletime/src/CMakeLists.txt 44a1f3f 
   tier1/kjs/CMakeLists.txt ab27a14 
   tier1/kjs/KF5JSConfig.cmake.in PRE-CREATION 
   tier1/kjs/KJSConfig.cmake.in 8c4ff9e 
   tier1/kjs/autotests/CMakeLists.txt 206c17a 
   tier1/kjs/src/kjs/CMakeLists.txt b63d92f 
   tier1/kjs/src/kjs/api/CMakeLists.txt dadf39c 
   tier1/kjs/tests/CMakeLists.txt 9388a70 
   tier1/kplotting/CMakeLists.txt f8e53ff 
   tier1/kplotting/KF5PlottingConfig.cmake.in PRE-CREATION 
   tier1/kplotting/KPlottingConfig.cmake.in 42d4fae 
   tier1/kplotting/autotests/CMakeLists.txt cc03ea4 
   tier1/kplotting/examples/CMakeLists.txt 7c8ab7e 
   tier1/kplotting/src/CMakeLists.txt 59e7d09 
   tier1/kwidgetsaddons/CMakeLists.txt 570630b 
   tier1/kwidgetsaddons/KF5WidgetsAddonsConfig.cmake.in PRE-CREATION 
   tier1/kwidgetsaddons/KWidgetsAddonsConfig.cmake.in 98dbc46 
   tier1/kwidgetsaddons/autotests/CMakeLists.txt 1f6b69f 
   tier1/kwidgetsaddons/src/CMakeLists.txt 0333f3a 
   

Re: Review Request 114333: Add KF5 prefix for tier2

2013-12-08 Thread Kevin Ottens

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114333/#review45361
---

Ship it!


Ship It!

- Kevin Ottens


On Dec. 6, 2013, 2:01 p.m., Martin Klapetek wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114333/
 ---
 
 (Updated Dec. 6, 2013, 2:01 p.m.)
 
 
 Review request for KDE Frameworks.
 
 
 Repository: kdelibs
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 Adds KF5 prefix to all tier2 frameworks
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   tier2/dnssd/CMakeLists.txt 542de05 
   tier2/dnssd/KDNSSDConfig.cmake.in 8678ccf 
   tier2/dnssd/src/CMakeLists.txt ec20b9d 
   tier2/kauth/CMakeLists.txt b01da0c 
   tier2/kauth/KAuthConfig.cmake.in 3bc86e3 
   tier2/kauth/autotests/CMakeLists.txt e973789 
   tier2/kauth/cmake/KAuthMacros.cmake 4cdf3ab 
   tier2/kauth/src/CMakeLists.txt c9ad99f 
   tier2/kauth/src/ConfigureChecks.cmake a2441d9 
   tier2/kcompletion/CMakeLists.txt 040f8d6 
   tier2/kcompletion/KCompletionConfig.cmake.in 528e9a9 
   tier2/kcompletion/KF5CompletionConfig.cmake.in PRE-CREATION 
   tier2/kcompletion/autotests/CMakeLists.txt 884db91 
   tier2/kcompletion/src/CMakeLists.txt 2f0a068 
   tier2/kcompletion/tests/CMakeLists.txt 1aeb870 
   tier2/kcrash/CMakeLists.txt 3267d8d 
   tier2/kcrash/KCrashConfig.cmake.in 417209a 
   tier2/kcrash/KF5CrashConfig.cmake.in PRE-CREATION 
   tier2/kcrash/src/CMakeLists.txt 5e91142 
   tier2/kdoctools/CMakeLists.txt 88e0e1a 
   tier2/kdoctools/KDocToolsConfig.cmake.in 9eb8706 
   tier2/kdoctools/KDocToolsMacros.cmake 191a2c5 
   tier2/kdoctools/KF5DocToolsConfig.cmake.in PRE-CREATION 
   tier2/kdoctools/KF5DocToolsMacros.cmake PRE-CREATION 
   tier2/kdoctools/src/CMakeLists.txt 3f77da0 
   tier2/ki18n/CMakeLists.txt ff8ec84 
   tier2/ki18n/KF5I18nConfig.cmake.in PRE-CREATION 
   tier2/ki18n/KI18nConfig.cmake.in e307f56 
   tier2/ki18n/autotests/CMakeLists.txt 1abb03a 
   tier2/ki18n/cmake/KF5I18NMacros.cmake PRE-CREATION 
   tier2/ki18n/cmake/KI18NMacros.cmake d82514e 
   tier2/ki18n/cmake/kf5i18nuic.cmake PRE-CREATION 
   tier2/ki18n/cmake/ki18nuic.cmake efcd0ae 
   tier2/ki18n/src/CMakeLists.txt 6534937 
   tier2/kjobwidgets/CMakeLists.txt 6759617 
   tier2/kjobwidgets/KF5JobWidgetsConfig.cmake.in PRE-CREATION 
   tier2/kjobwidgets/KJobWidgetsConfig.cmake.in 8ca5e9d 
   tier2/kjobwidgets/autotests/CMakeLists.txt d290a7b 
   tier2/kjobwidgets/src/CMakeLists.txt 032df16 
   tier2/kjobwidgets/tests/CMakeLists.txt b453512 
   tier2/knotifications/CMakeLists.txt 4f71b2e 
   tier2/knotifications/KF5NotificationsConfig.cmake.in PRE-CREATION 
   tier2/knotifications/KNotificationsConfig.cmake.in 0054854 
   tier2/knotifications/autotests/CMakeLists.txt cf59af5 
   tier2/knotifications/src/CMakeLists.txt 3011a3d 
   tier2/knotifications/tests/CMakeLists.txt 01c566a 
   tier2/kwallet/CMakeLists.txt 0cf9a55 
   tier2/kwallet/KF5WalletConfig.cmake.in PRE-CREATION 
   tier2/kwallet/KWalletConfig.cmake.in ca11594 
   tier2/kwallet/autotests/CMakeLists.txt ef707c1 
   tier2/kwallet/src/CMakeLists.txt 206dd69 
   tier2/kwallet/tests/CMakeLists.txt ea1562a 
 
 Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114333/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Martin Klapetek
 


___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel


Jenkins build became unstable: kdelibs_frameworks_qt5 #1831

2013-12-08 Thread KDE CI System
See http://build.kde.org/job/kdelibs_frameworks_qt5/1831/changes

___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel


Review Request 114356: Move KGlobalAccel from XmlGui into an own tier1 framework

2013-12-08 Thread Martin Gräßlin

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114356/
---

Review request for KDE Frameworks and Martin Klapetek.


Repository: kdelibs


Description
---

New framework needs DBus, Widgets and (optionally) X11Extras as dependencies.

@MartinK: how should we organize the renaming? I'm still using the old naming 
scheme. So should I adjust or should we use your scripts after pulling this one 
in?


Diffs
-

  tier1/CMakeLists.txt 450ca57 
  tier1/kglobalaccel/CMakeLists.txt PRE-CREATION 
  tier1/kglobalaccel/KGlobalAccelConfig.cmake.in PRE-CREATION 
  tier1/kglobalaccel/autotests/CMakeLists.txt PRE-CREATION 
  tier1/kglobalaccel/autotests/kglobalshortcuttest.h PRE-CREATION 
  tier1/kglobalaccel/autotests/kglobalshortcuttest.cpp PRE-CREATION 
  tier1/kglobalaccel/src/CMakeLists.txt PRE-CREATION 
  tier1/kglobalaccel/src/config-kglobalaccel.h.cmake PRE-CREATION 
  tier1/kglobalaccel/src/kglobalaccel.h PRE-CREATION 
  tier1/kglobalaccel/src/kglobalaccel.cpp PRE-CREATION 
  tier1/kglobalaccel/src/kglobalaccel_p.h PRE-CREATION 
  tier1/kglobalaccel/src/kglobalshortcutinfo.h PRE-CREATION 
  tier1/kglobalaccel/src/kglobalshortcutinfo.cpp PRE-CREATION 
  tier1/kglobalaccel/src/kglobalshortcutinfo_dbus.cpp PRE-CREATION 
  tier1/kglobalaccel/src/kglobalshortcutinfo_p.h PRE-CREATION 
  tier1/kglobalaccel/src/org.kde.KGlobalAccel.xml PRE-CREATION 
  tier1/kglobalaccel/src/org.kde.kglobalaccel.Component.xml PRE-CREATION 
  tier3/xmlgui/CMakeLists.txt 75593fb 
  tier3/xmlgui/autotests/CMakeLists.txt 6546ac7 
  tier3/xmlgui/autotests/kglobalshortcuttest.h d8e0024 
  tier3/xmlgui/autotests/kglobalshortcuttest.cpp 453920b 
  tier3/xmlgui/src/CMakeLists.txt 31621e2 
  tier3/xmlgui/src/kactioncollection.cpp 0266069 
  tier3/xmlgui/src/kglobalaccel.h 57482ad 
  tier3/xmlgui/src/kglobalaccel.cpp 77ce993 
  tier3/xmlgui/src/kglobalaccel_p.h 50f271f 
  tier3/xmlgui/src/kglobalshortcutinfo.h 0920f01 
  tier3/xmlgui/src/kglobalshortcutinfo.cpp d2ca948 
  tier3/xmlgui/src/kglobalshortcutinfo_dbus.cpp f49bd9d 
  tier3/xmlgui/src/kglobalshortcutinfo_p.h dd2dd2d 
  tier3/xmlgui/src/kkeysequencewidget.cpp 2148ce0 
  tier3/xmlgui/src/kshortcutseditor.cpp 3e917d2 
  tier3/xmlgui/src/kshortcutseditoritem.cpp e7257a6 
  tier3/xmlgui/src/kxmlguifactory.cpp 510d2ea 
  tier3/xmlgui/src/org.kde.KGlobalAccel.xml 8746551 
  tier3/xmlgui/src/org.kde.kglobalaccel.Component.xml ec21201 
  tier4/kde4support/CMakeLists.txt cb73b46 
  tier4/kde4support/src/CMakeLists.txt 39298b9 
  tier4/khtml/CMakeLists.txt c937f38 
  tier4/khtml/src/CMakeLists.txt 00243fb 

Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114356/diff/


Testing
---


Thanks,

Martin Gräßlin

___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel