Re: libmm-qt/libnm-qt as KF5

Hi, On Wednesday 09 of April 2014 07:20 Kevin Ottens wrote: > Hello, > > On Tuesday 08 April 2014 19:51:05 Lamarque Souza wrote: > > I understood that, I just do not know all the other things we need to do > > > > to make NMQt/MMQt part of KF5. And yes, I agree in making NMQt/MMQt part > > of >

Re: libmm-qt/libnm-qt as KF5

Hello, On Tuesday 08 April 2014 19:51:05 Lamarque Souza wrote: > I understood that, I just do not know all the other things we need to do > to make NMQt/MMQt part of KF5. And yes, I agree in making NMQt/MMQt part of > KF5. The other doubt I still have is where _kde_add_platform_definitions > is

Re: Review Request 117437: KUser: Make guessHomeDir compatible with Windows XP

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117437/ --- (Updated April 9, 2014, 2:28 a.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 117437: KUser: Make guessHomeDir compatible with Windows XP

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117437/#review55246 --- This review has been submitted with commit 1941535715298ecd2e

Re: Review Request 117132: Use QLocale for figuring out what languages we're translated into

> On April 7, 2014, 3:27 p.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: > > So what do we do with that one? Afaik Chusslove said drop, I have no clue tbh, haven't had time to invest on i18n/kf5 and don't forsee i'll have much :/ - Albert --- This is an aut

Re: libmm-qt/libnm-qt as KF5

Hi, I understood that, I just do not know all the other things we need to do to make NMQt/MMQt part of KF5. And yes, I agree in making NMQt/MMQt part of KF5. The other doubt I still have is where _kde_add_platform_definitions is defined. By what I could figure out it is not in ECM, so something

Re: Review Request 117437: KUser: Make guessHomeDir compatible with Windows XP

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117437/#review55244 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Alexander Richardson On April 8, 2014,

Review Request 117440: Make sure that common licenses are accessed throught help:/ protocol

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117440/ --- Review request for Documentation and KDE Frameworks. Repository: kdoctool

Re: Review Request 116881: Fix KUser::groups() and KUser::groupNames() on UNIX

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116881/#review55243 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Michael Pyne On April 8, 2014, 8:30 a.

Review Request 117437: KUser: Make guessHomeDir compatible with Windows XP

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117437/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: kcoreaddons Description

Re: Review Request 117435: Import KDirSelectDialog + use it if QFileDialog requests dirs only

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117435/ --- (Updated April 8, 2014, 6:14 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks. C

Re: Kioslave repos

On Tuesday 08 April 2014 17:09:53 Aleix Pol wrote: > Right, I updated the runtime splitting wiki page with this [1], by delaying > to the futurible maintainer of the kio-extras the decision of what > kioslaves to deprecate. Good move. Pushed me toward looking a bit closer to this page, as obvious

Re: Review Request 117016: Allow overriding DrKonqi lookup directories by PATH

> On March 24, 2014, 3:41 p.m., Alex Merry wrote: > > The correct solution is to get drkonqi merged into kcrash (see > > http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Epics/New_Runtime_Organization). > > Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote: > Agreed. If somebody has the time, it would be interesting to figure o

Re: Kioslave repos

On Tuesday 08 April 2014 14:31:51 Alex Merry wrote: > Well, I would say: discard them or include them. I know Albert was > pushing not to get rid of code that still technically works, but I think > you either have to go that route and put it in > kioslaves/kio-extras/whatever (so that it will hope

Re: Kioslave repos

On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Alex Merry wrote: > On 08/04/14 12:21, Aleix Pol wrote: > > Given that premise, would you suggest having kurifilter-plugins in this > > repository as well? > > > > We can have a kio-extras repository with KIO::everything in it. > > That seems reasonable to me. > >

Re: Review Request 117435: Import KDirSelectDialog + use it if QFileDialog requests dirs only

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117435/#review55229 --- autotests/CMakeLists.txt

KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w15

Hello everyone, This is the minutes of the Week 15 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. Were present: agateau, apol, mck182, notmart, tosky and myself. * agateau put more work on translation support for Qt-based frameworks; * he fixed string extraction from

Re: Kioslave repos

On Tuesday 08 April 2014 14:31:51 Alex Merry wrote: > On 08/04/14 14:02, Àlex Fiestas wrote: > > I personally do not want to have those not of interest or unmaintained > > kiosalves around, I do not want to maintain them, I do not want distros to > > ship them by default (which will happen for thos

Re: Kioslave repos

On 08/04/14 14:02, Àlex Fiestas wrote: > I personally do not want to have those not of interest or unmaintained > kiosalves around, I do not want to maintain them, I do not want distros to > ship them by default (which will happen for those distros that will pacakge > the entire repository) etc.

Re: Status of the KDE Runtime module splitting

On Tuesday 08 April 2014 07:52:24 Kevin Ottens wrote: > I agree there's one repository too many. But that's clearly workspace stuff > to me. We discussed this a few weeks back and decided that we do not want those ioslaves in kde-workspace, we are not going to maintain them and we do not care of

Re: Kioslave repos

On Monday 07 April 2014 23:27:33 Alex Merry wrote: > Aleix wanted a separate thread for this, so here it is. > > The current runtime splitting plan says that ioslaves should be in three > places: core ones (file, http, etc) in kio, other useful ones (archive, > bookmarks, etc) in "kioslaves", and

Review Request 117435: Import KDirSelectDialog + use it if QFileDialog requests dirs only

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117435/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: frameworkintegration Des

Re: Kioslave repos

On 08/04/14 12:21, Aleix Pol wrote: > Given that premise, would you suggest having kurifilter-plugins in this > repository as well? > > We can have a kio-extras repository with KIO::everything in it. That seems reasonable to me. Alex ___ Kde-framework

Re: Kioslave repos

On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Alex Merry wrote: > Aleix wanted a separate thread for this, so here it is. > > The current runtime splitting plan says that ioslaves should be in three > places: core ones (file, http, etc) in kio, other useful ones (archive, > bookmarks, etc) in "kioslaves", and

Re: Kioslave repos

On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Kevin Ottens wrote: > Hello, > > On Tuesday 08 April 2014 12:30:44 Aleix Pol wrote: > > The rationale is that we should never need to pull a Plasma Workspace to > > get an _application_ running. > > I'd argue the application is broken if that happens. :-) > > A re

Re: Kioslave repos

Hello, On Tuesday 08 April 2014 12:30:44 Aleix Pol wrote: > The rationale is that we should never need to pull a Plasma Workspace to > get an _application_ running. I'd argue the application is broken if that happens. :-) A regular application should only need KDE Frameworks and eventually other

Build failed in Jenkins: kdelibs4support_master_qt5 #114

See -- Started by user Ben Cooksley Building remotely on LinuxSlave - 3 (PACKAGER LINBUILDER) in workspace Running Prebuild steps [kdelibs4s

Build failed in Jenkins: kdelibs4support_master_qt5 #113

See -- Started by user Ben Cooksley Building remotely on LinuxSlave - 3 (PACKAGER LINBUILDER) in workspace Running Prebuild steps [kdelibs4s

Re: Kioslave repos

On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Kevin Ottens wrote: > Hello, > > On Monday 07 April 2014 23:27:33 Alex Merry wrote: > > Aleix wanted a separate thread for this, so here it is. > > > > The current runtime splitting plan says that ioslaves should be in three > > places: core ones (file, http, etc)

Re: kde4support => kdelibs4support[Was: Re: Releasing Deprecated modules and Tier 4 Definition]

On Tuesday 08 April 2014 22:25:48 Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Hello, > > Hi all, > > > On Thursday 03 April 2014 09:50:24 Jos Poortvliet wrote: > >> On Wednesday 19 March 2014 10:41:15 Ben Cooksley wrote: > >> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:15 AM, K

Re: kde4support => kdelibs4support[Was: Re: Releasing Deprecated modules and Tier 4 Definition]

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Kevin Ottens wrote: > Hello, Hi all, > > On Thursday 03 April 2014 09:50:24 Jos Poortvliet wrote: >> On Wednesday 19 March 2014 10:41:15 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Kevin Ottens wrote: >> > > Hello, >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > > On Monda

Re: [kinit] /: Revert "Replace GPL proctitle code with BSD-licensed code from OpenSSH"

On 08/04/14 11:09, Alex Merry wrote: > Git commit b15084d9316e34462c2508051c6ac89bcf8d77ee by Alex Merry. > Committed on 08/04/2014 at 10:06. > Pushed by alexmerry into branch 'master'. > > Revert "Replace GPL proctitle code with BSD-licensed code from OpenSSH" > > This reverts commit 8d13c18a4e4

Re: Status of the KDE Runtime module splitting

On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Kevin Ottens wrote: > Hello, > > On Monday 07 April 2014 18:57:25 Aleix Pol wrote: > > We started the discussion of splitting some time where we somewhat agreed > > on a splitting plan [1]. I've been working during the last week on it, > and > > decided I'd send an

Re: Review Request 116881: Fix KUser::groups() and KUser::groupNames() on UNIX

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116881/ --- (Updated April 8, 2014, 10:30 a.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks.