Hi all,
Just to let everyone know, I'm taking over the role of maintainer for both
KConfig and KDNSSD. I'm most contactable at this email address (
matt...@mjdsystems.ca ). I'm usually idling on IRC with a nick of MJD, but
I'm not always watching IRC.
I'll do my best to watch over the
On February 6, 2014 12:12:18 PM Alex Merry wrote:
On 06/02/14 07:38, Matthew Dawson wrote:
I'll do my best to watch over the frameworks, but I'm not sure how much
I'll be able to push them forward in the near future. At the very least
I'll keep an eye on any review requests that come
On February 23, 2014 11:15:47 AM David Faure wrote:
Add sharedConfig() accessor, to avoid manipulating a raw KConfig * as
returned by config().
I had thought that when dealing with smart pointers, one should in general
always pass around the smart pointer and not the raw pointer behind it.
On Feb. 28, 2014, 3:41 p.m., Matthew Dawson wrote:
While I'm fine with the idea behind this optimization, I worry that this
implementation could create situations were a configuration change is not
picked up by the system. For instance, what happens if the user doesn't
immediately
::openConfig() is used
- Matthew Dawson
On March 10, 2014, 4:36 a.m., David Faure wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116689
On March 13, 2014, 3:54 p.m., Matthew Dawson wrote:
src/core/kcoreconfigskeleton.cpp, line 990
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116689/diff/1/?file=253151#file253151line990
Also, can you change the documentation for KCoreConfigSkeleton to
reflect this change? Specifically
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116689/#review52913
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Matthew Dawson
On March 13, 2014, 4
On Feb. 28, 2014, 3:41 p.m., Matthew Dawson wrote:
While I'm fine with the idea behind this optimization, I worry that this
implementation could create situations were a configuration change is not
picked up by the system. For instance, what happens if the user doesn't
immediately
On Feb. 28, 2014, 3:41 p.m., Matthew Dawson wrote:
While I'm fine with the idea behind this optimization, I worry that this
implementation could create situations were a configuration change is not
picked up by the system. For instance, what happens if the user doesn't
immediately
On Feb. 28, 2014, 3:41 p.m., Matthew Dawson wrote:
While I'm fine with the idea behind this optimization, I worry that this
implementation could create situations were a configuration change is not
picked up by the system. For instance, what happens if the user doesn't
immediately
this function, can you also kill this line please?
- Matthew Dawson
On March 16, 2014, 7:08 p.m., David Faure wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116845
On Feb. 28, 2014, 3:41 p.m., Matthew Dawson wrote:
While I'm fine with the idea behind this optimization, I worry that this
implementation could create situations were a configuration change is not
picked up by the system. For instance, what happens if the user doesn't
immediately
in as is. The rest can be done later. If
you prefer, I'll revert the DelayedParsing commit after you commit this.
- Matthew Dawson
On March 17, 2014, 7:17 p.m., David Faure wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit
.
Thanks,
Matthew Dawson
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117010/diff/
Testing
---
Unit tests continue to pass.
Thanks,
Matthew Dawson
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117486/#review55422
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Matthew Dawson
On April 10, 2014, 12
be made later.
- Matthew Dawson
On May 4, 2014, 2:32 p.m., David Faure wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117989
Hi all,
I was looking into my frameworks, to prepare them for the 5.0. One thing was
looking into was the deprecation defines. In KConfig, there are a couple of
defines to disable deprecated functions:
- KDE_NO_DEPRECATED
- KCONFIGCORE_NO_DEPRECATED
- KCONFIGGUI_NO_DEPRECATED
Where
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118039/#review58433
---
Ship it!
Excellent. Thanks for the patch!
- Matthew Dawson
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118332/#review58506
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Matthew Dawson
On May 26, 2014, 2:38
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118339/#review58533
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Matthew Dawson
On May 26, 2014, 11:36
b4733648fd53ebd681694f185cc5b23f51dfd3f9
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118340/diff/
Testing
---
Visually inspected install directories. Seems to remove only what is necessary.
Thanks,
Matthew Dawson
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
On May 27, 2014 07:53:03 AM Marko Käning wrote:
On 27 May 2014, at 07:29 , Ben Cooksley bcooks...@kde.org wrote:
Please try the following syntax instead.
Note that I recommend you override this in
config/build/darwin-mavericks.cfg instead to ensure all CMake projects
on OS X are affected
On May 27, 2014 04:03:03 PM Mark Gaiser wrote:
I looked at this issue and it is introduced by commit:
5f4dc2973f10cd44b2c70680fee72dd8fc545d2f in kconfig.
Belonging to this review request:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118039/ It removes readCheck and
writeCheck.
I don't know what the
.
Thanks,
Matthew Dawson
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118340/#review58731
---
On May 27, 2014, 1:27 a.m., Matthew Dawson wrote
/#review58733
---
On May 27, 2014, 1:27 a.m., Matthew Dawson wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118340
---
Visually inspected install directories. Seems to remove only what is necessary.
Thanks,
Matthew Dawson
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
/
Testing
---
Visually inspected install directories. Seems to remove only what is necessary.
Thanks,
Matthew Dawson
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
the daemon itself is causing the issue.
Thanks,
Matthew Dawson
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
1dd9e7fc44a367165fedc2e7760c8b524ecd210e
src/kconfig_compiler/kconfig_compiler.cpp
28b151c579c2c40e118b3b738a1e6ac81e461b3e
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118489/diff/
Testing
---
Unit tests still pass, regardless of whether or not deprecated features are
enabled.
Thanks,
Matthew Dawson
,
Matthew Dawson
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118490/#review59066
---
On June 3, 2014, 2:59 a.m., Matthew Dawson wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118489/#review59060
---
On June 3, 2014, 2:34 a.m., Matthew Dawson wrote:
---
This is an automatically
., Matthew Dawson wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118458/
---
(Updated June 1, 2014, 5:03 p.m.)
Review
tests all pass now with gamin. Using FAM, one test fails as described
above, but I've confirmed the daemon itself is causing the issue.
Thanks,
Matthew Dawson
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org
and Matthew Dawson.
Changes
---
New version, taking into account all comments. I'd appreciate it if someone
can have a quick look over the comment to verify it makes sense.
Summary (updated)
-
Properly mark ServiceBrowser::isRunning as deprecated.
Repository: kdnssd
marked as submitted.
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Matthew Dawson.
Repository: kdnssd
Description
---
Properly mark ServiceBrowser::isRunning as deprecated.
Fix the @deprecated notation to be correct. Also, make the function a simple
inline function that always returns false
pass now with gamin. Using FAM, one test fails as described
above, but I've confirmed the daemon itself is causing the issue.
Thanks,
Matthew Dawson
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman
pass now with gamin. Using FAM, one test fails as described
above, but I've confirmed the daemon itself is causing the issue.
Thanks,
Matthew Dawson
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman
://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118564/#comment41428
Just to be safe, can you please save + restore the previous default?
- Matthew Dawson
On June 6, 2014, 7:43 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit
---
Unit tests all pass on all four backends (FAM only tested against gamin)
Thanks,
Matthew Dawson
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
7da1fdba8cd1a2e6a7d5bf9cef999d50b44ebf99
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118612/diff/
Testing
---
Unit tests all pass on all four backends (FAM only tested against gamin)
Thanks,
Matthew Dawson
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde
On June 7, 2014, 12:33 a.m., Matthew Dawson wrote:
autotests/kconfigtest.cpp, line 930
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118564/diff/3/?file=279334#file279334line930
Similarly, can you just change the config object's locale to something
(en seems fine here) instead of changing
/#comment41675
Whitespace
- Matthew Dawson
On June 11, 2014, 2:54 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118564
7da1fdba8cd1a2e6a7d5bf9cef999d50b44ebf99
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118612/diff/
Testing
---
Unit tests all pass on all four backends (FAM only tested against gamin)
Thanks,
Matthew Dawson
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118612/diff/
Testing
---
Unit tests all pass on all four backends (FAM only tested against gamin)
Thanks,
Matthew Dawson
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman
be
GlobalSharedConfigList? Why not just put the logic in globalSharedConfigList?
src/core/ksharedconfig.cpp
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118739/#comment42038
Can you also please document the new behaviour of openConfig, that each
instance is thread specific?
- Matthew Dawson
On June 14
.
src/core/kconfigdata.h
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118692/#comment42056
Another Q_NULLPTR
src/core/kconfigini.cpp
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118692/#comment42057
Another Q_NULLPTR.
- Matthew Dawson
On June 16, 2014, 4:26 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote
On June 18, 2014, 3:04 a.m., Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
i don't see that you are proactively excluding the @modifier. it would seem
that it's effectively part of the country, and the test works only because
it's expected to fall back to de instead of de_AT anyway.
there is another
On June 17, 2014, 12:50 p.m., Matthew Dawson wrote:
src/core/ksharedconfig.cpp, line 52
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118739/diff/1/?file=28#file28line52
Why create a template function here, when the T must be
GlobalSharedConfigList? Why not just put the logic
On June 17, 2014, 6:50 p.m., Matthew Dawson wrote:
autotests/kdesktopfiletest.cpp, line 88
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118692/diff/2-3/?file=280487#file280487line88
Please add a test for both:
- when both the country/language match and a modifier is included
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118692/#review60621
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Matthew Dawson
On June 20, 2014, 4:56
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118739/#review60681
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Matthew Dawson
On June 21, 2014, 5:37
to be mainly an optimization to ensure the config is not
unnecessarily deleted, I think it makes sense to still run this on alternate
threads.
- Matthew Dawson
On June 27, 2014, 6:31 p.m., David Faure wrote
On June 28, 2014, 11:31 p.m., Matthew Dawson wrote:
I'm not sure about moving the warning about immutable files to only happen
on the main thread, as it is possible that an application may use it
KSharedConfig on an alternate thread only.
As this is mainly an optimization, I think
patch, feel free to commit
it once fixed.
src/core/ksharedconfig.cpp
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118985/#comment42692
Whitespace.
- Matthew Dawson
On June 29, 2014, 9:55 a.m., David Faure wrote
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119074/#review61417
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Matthew Dawson
On July 1, 2014, 2:35
On July 7, 2014 11:39:38 PM David Faure wrote:
On Monday 05 May 2014 13:14:07 Alex Merry wrote:
On 05/05/14 07:27, Matthew Dawson wrote:
Hi all,
I was looking into my frameworks, to prepare them for the 5.0. One
thing
was looking into was the deprecation defines. In KConfig
On July 8, 2014 11:20:37 AM David Faure wrote:
I have a patch sitting in review for kconfig.
What's the RR number? I can't see it in my k-f-d folder.
118489. It already has comments on it, with the decision that policy needs to
be figured out before it is pushed.
I'm waiting on a
On July 8, 2014 10:50:18 PM David Faure wrote:
I agree. I figured the first step was to come up with a draft policy and
post to the list for comments, and as I said I'm trying to get a new
contributer to help (they have lots of experience writing documents, and
have a strong technical
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119577/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Matthew Dawson.
Bugs: 337979
---
On Aug. 2, 2014, 1:07 p.m., Matthew Dawson wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119577
marked as submitted.
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Matthew Dawson.
Bugs: 337979
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=337979
Repository: kconfig
Description
---
Allow translations to have context again.
Switch to using QT_TRANSLATE_NOOP3 so that context information can
(or other
interested parties) to watch their framework's comments, to be on the look out
for any interesting conversation? Users may make comments about the API's that
would be good to follow up on.
Thanks for looking into this!
- Matthew Dawson
On Aug. 29, 2014, 10:16 a.m., Denis
a KConfig or a KConfigGroup and be able
load/persist its settings would be good.
- Matthew Dawson
On Aug. 29, 2014, 5:42 p.m., Martin Klapetek wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https
On Aug. 31, 2014, 12:57 a.m., Matthew Dawson wrote:
Thanks for taking a look at this. It appears KConfigBase isn't available
on api.kde.org as it isn't documented, as kapidox hides such classes by
default. As KConfigBase is used outside of KConfig, I'd prefer if
KConfigBase gained
On Aug. 31, 2014, 12:57 a.m., Matthew Dawson wrote:
Thanks for taking a look at this. It appears KConfigBase isn't available
on api.kde.org as it isn't documented, as kapidox hides such classes by
default. As KConfigBase is used outside of KConfig, I'd prefer if
KConfigBase gained
On Sept. 8, 2014, 6:22 p.m., Ben Cooksley wrote:
What is the status of this? Is there anything blocking it being shipped and
made available on api.kde.org?
Denis Steckelmacher wrote:
It works locally, so I'm just waiting for a ship-it or other comments :-)
Aleix Pol Gonzalez
On Aug. 31, 2014, 12:57 a.m., Matthew Dawson wrote:
Thanks for taking a look at this. It appears KConfigBase isn't available
on api.kde.org as it isn't documented, as kapidox hides such classes by
default. As KConfigBase is used outside of KConfig, I'd prefer if
KConfigBase gained
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119991/#review66315
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Matthew Dawson
On Aug. 29, 2014, 10
wrote:
Let's see if we can get this discussed in the KF5 BoF today.
Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
I kind of forgot... :(
Anyway, +1 for me. If there are no reasons to keep postponing it, I'd say
let's just do this.
Matthew Dawson wrote:
The only issue I see
On September 12, 2014 03:19:13 AM Ben Cooksley wrote:
On Sept. 8, 2014, 10:22 p.m., Ben Cooksley wrote:
Matthew Dawson wrote:
I don't think upstream would be happy with the patch, as it hijacks
the moderator emails (which should link to the admin page) to send
out
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120283/#review66958
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Matthew Dawson
On Sept. 19, 2014, 7
On September 18, 2014 01:15:51 PM Aleix Pol wrote:
Hi Ivan,
I've just learned that the KActivities framework is not co-installable with
kdelibs4.
Are you sure about this? I just double checked, and my distribution (Gentoo)
has both installed right now, in the same prefix. And I'm running
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121272/#review71044
---
Ship it!
Thanks! Will push shortly.
- Matthew Dawson
On November 28, 2014 01:16:02 PM Jonathan Riddell wrote:
At Kubuntu we're trying to work out if we want kcoreaddons to build-dep on
FAM.
FAM isn't used if inotify is available and kdelibs never built against FAM.
But we had this bug report about FAM being needed for NFS
) and
Matthew Dawson.
Bugs: 1164383
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1164383
Repository: kconfig
Description
---
As requested in bug #1164383, this adds a new standard shortcut
for adding bookmarks for web pages.
BUG: 1164383
I'm not sure if this is the best approach
, Localization and Translation (l10n) and
Matthew Dawson.
Changes
---
Copy+paste error on bug number.
Bugs: 341279
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341279
Repository: kconfig
Description
---
As requested in bug #1164383, this adds a new standard shortcut
for adding bookmarks
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121372/#review71585
---
On Dec. 6, 2014, 3:49 p.m., Matthew Dawson wrote
On Jan. 23, 2015, 8:43 a.m., Vishesh Handa wrote:
I'm not against this, but I am curious as to why this is being done.
I would think that packagers should be building the tests and running them
on their platform and make sure everything passes. We have a strict policy
that all
tests must always pass.
Matthew Dawson wrote:
This is mostly useful on source based distributions (specifically, this
patch comes from Gentoo). While in general running tests everywhere would be
great, source distro users may not have the cpu time to compile/run tests.
Also, some test
tests must always pass.
Matthew Dawson wrote:
This is mostly useful on source based distributions (specifically, this
patch comes from Gentoo). While in general running tests everywhere would be
great, source distro users may not have the cpu time to compile/run tests.
Also, some test
tests must always pass.
Matthew Dawson wrote:
This is mostly useful on source based distributions (specifically, this
patch comes from Gentoo). While in general running tests everywhere would be
great, source distro users may not have the cpu time to compile/run tests.
Also, some test
stay empty.
Maybe add another conditional checking its empty in this if statement, and
if it still is add some random value?
- Matthew Dawson
On Jan. 23, 2015, 5:39 p.m., David Faure wrote:
---
This is an automatically
?
Otherwise, everything looked go to me.
autotests/ksharedconfig_in_global_object.cpp
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122232/#comment51847
Line to comment out. For the final version this should work without this
line.
- Matthew Dawson
On Jan. 26, 2015, 3:11 a.m., David Faure wrote
. 27, 2015, 3:10 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Matthew Dawson.
Repository: kconfig
Description
---
kconfig_in_global_object.cpp comes from kdelibs4support
(after porting to Q_GLOBAL_STATIC)
ksharedconfig_in_global_object.cpp is new (but works with kdelibs4
the read call.
Matthew Dawson wrote:
The read call was removed to avoid changing the KCoreConfigSekleton
during the save call, as it wasn't documented as doing that and may surprise
some people that flushing their changes may load other unrelated changes. I
would prefer to keep
the unit test refactoring
out to a separate commit just before the bug fix commit? If not, just push it
as is.
- Matthew Dawson
On Jan. 6, 2015, 5:41 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail
On February 14, 2015 11:16:42 AM David Faure wrote:
This is rather a behavior-incompatible change (and another one to revert).
So, to avoid the packagers killing me for updating 5.7 two days *after* the
supposed public release day (*), I would rather make a 5.7.1 kconfig release
with this
On February 5, 2015 08:49:16 PM Marco Martin wrote:
Hi all,
I was investigating this bug..
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id43583
but after digging and digging, it looks like more and more an issue in
KConfig..
basically if there is a config file in a system-wide location (to give
Hi all,
If it is not too late to sneak an extra patch into KConfig's 5.7 release,
could commit 9eee15917e01a89d937d1cba2eebbe9d65daeb72 (
http://commits.kde.org/kconfig/9eee15917e01a89d937d1cba2eebbe9d65daeb72 ) be
added in?
This change reverts a SIC, which will break updating of
On Jan. 27, 2015, 3:55 p.m., Matthew Dawson wrote:
Unforunately, this cause test system failures in the the
kconfigskeletontest test suite. I'm not sure why this should create issues
there.
However, I have a partial solution that avoids creating a full
KSharedConfig. Instead
cc17ef6e3f3c0db3c4597105b32320f0aeb52b0f
autotests/kstyle_unittest.cpp e0e0046100acc195b1a3c36bbbe67e5861d7b7ee
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121908/diff/
Testing
---
Executing the test suite locally now succeeds.
Thanks,
Matthew Dawson
e0e0046100acc195b1a3c36bbbe67e5861d7b7ee
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121908/diff/
Testing
---
Executing the test suite locally now succeeds.
Thanks,
Matthew Dawson
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman
:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121838/
---
(Updated Jan. 4, 2015, 11:04 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Matthew Dawson.
Repository: kconfig
On March 21, 2015 04:00:11 PM Mathias Kraus wrote:
===
KConfig config(QLatin1String(kminesrc));
config.reparseConfiguration();
===
Sorry, my suggestion of using reparseConfiguration wasn't clear. I meant
using it against the global KSharedConfig, not a newly created KConfig.
On March 21, 2015 04:29:25 PM Mathias Kraus wrote:
Am Samstag, 21. März 2015, 11:06:02 schrieb Matthew Dawson:
On March 21, 2015 04:00:11 PM Mathias Kraus wrote:
===
KConfig config(QLatin1String(kminesrc));
config.reparseConfiguration();
===
Sorry, my suggestion
On March 22, 2015 06:19:46 PM David Faure wrote:
On Saturday 21 March 2015 23:53:07 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Too late for KDE Applications 15.04 though now that i think, so maybe we
actually have to suggest everybody using the migrator to add those extra
lines?
OK, that means:
---
On March 3, 2015 10:59:21 PM Mathias Kraus wrote:
Hi,
I noticed a problem with the data migration in the kdegames transition from
kdelibs4 to kf5 and Albert Astals Cid suggested to ask frameworks devel for
advice.
In short, when the migration is run after the QCoreApplication is created,
1 - 100 of 171 matches
Mail list logo
