Oxygen+Qt5 has inherited the spaciousness of breeze, which if you ask me it
does not make sense, i'd expect Oxygen+Qt5 and Oxygen+Qt4 to be the same
visually.
Cheers,
Albert
El Diumenge, 4 de gener de 2015, a les 17:14:45, Andrius da Costa Ribas va
escriure:
I refrain from calling win9x
Oxygen+Qt5 has inherited the spaciousness of breeze, which if you ask me it
does not make sense, i'd expect Oxygen+Qt5 and Oxygen+Qt4 to be the same
+1
--
Cheerio,
Ivan
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
Hi, there is some background context in review requests 115752 and 115210
(especially the last comment in this one) , but there was no final
conclusion, so this can be considered a workaround to keep coherent to what
was being done with KDE4 on Windows.
Regarding oxygen, we'd probably change it
On Saturday January 03 2015 11:53:48 Andrius da Costa Ribas wrote:
Regarding oxygen, we'd probably change it later into breeze.
My advice: don't, it's ugly and way too spacious ;)
Then again, oxygen5 is, too.
Oxygen works
fine (Qt fallbacks to ugly win9x when it's not available).
Not to
2015-01-03 11:04 GMT-03:00 René J.V. rjvber...@gmail.com:
On Saturday January 03 2015 11:53:48 Andrius da Costa Ribas wrote:
Regarding oxygen, we'd probably change it later into breeze.
My advice: don't, it's ugly and way too spacious ;)
Then again, oxygen5 is, too.
Oxygen works
fine (Qt
Hi
Interesting. Would you mind giving some context, arguments behind choices and
things like that?
Also, do I understand correctly that you set Oxygen as the default style? Does
it work correctly on Ms Windows?
On 28 Dec 2014, at 01:24, Andrius da Costa Ribas andrius...@gmail.com wrote:
In
In our Windows Emerge scripts QStandardPaths is already being patched for a
while:
http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=emerge.gita=blobh=e716bf675669139059a96db6be76cc3470487d64hb=b64cc189fa1918894653f185068e1786b31bd02ef=portage%2Flibs%2Fqt5%2Fqtbase%2Fqtbase-20130714.patch
2014-12-15 19:12 GMT-02:00
Hi David,
back to our discussion during this summer:
On 10 Jul 2014, at 11:57 , David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
Wrong approach. XDG is a freedesktop thing which doesn't apply to Mac.
This should be fixed the other way around:
1) finding out how Mac OS lets people configure the location for
