On Feb. 13, 2014, 4:28 a.m., Rex Dieter wrote:
fyi, http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/menu-spec-latest.html ,
supporting vendor prefixes are not only a good idea, but is strongly
encouraged. ... it is recommended that providers of desktop-files ensure
that all desktop-file
On Feb. 13, 2014, 4:28 a.m., Rex Dieter wrote:
fyi, http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/menu-spec-latest.html ,
supporting vendor prefixes are not only a good idea, but is strongly
encouraged. ... it is recommended that providers of desktop-files ensure
that all desktop-file
On Feb. 13, 2014, 4:28 a.m., Rex Dieter wrote:
fyi, http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/menu-spec-latest.html ,
supporting vendor prefixes are not only a good idea, but is strongly
encouraged. ... it is recommended that providers of desktop-files ensure
that all desktop-file
On Feb. 13, 2014, 4:28 a.m., Rex Dieter wrote:
fyi, http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/menu-spec-latest.html ,
supporting vendor prefixes are not only a good idea, but is strongly
encouraged. ... it is recommended that providers of desktop-files ensure
that all desktop-file
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115683/#review49647
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115683/
---
(Updated Feb. 12, 2014, 10:37 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115683/#review49689
---
fyi,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115683/
---
Review request for Build System, Extra Cmake Modules, KDE Frameworks, and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115683/#review49616
---
Ship it!
I would say it makes sense, I don't know about any
