---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116866/#review53309
---
src/ConfigureChecks.cmake
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116768/#review53310
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116768/
---
(Updated March 18, 2014, 10:32 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
See http://build.kde.org/job/krunner_master_qt5/36/
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
On March 17, 2014, 4:28 p.m., Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
src/lib/util/kuser.h, line 216
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116798/diff/4/?file=254169#file254169line216
I know the review has already been submitted, but shouldn't this be
const KUserId uid instead of KUserId uid?
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115918/#review53313
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115918/
---
(Updated March 18, 2014, 12:17 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116699/#review53314
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116699/
---
(Updated March 18, 2014, 12:19 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On March 17, 2014, 4:28 p.m., Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
src/lib/util/kuser.h, line 216
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116798/diff/4/?file=254169#file254169line216
I know the review has already been submitted, but shouldn't this be
const KUserId uid instead of KUserId uid?
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014, at 15:09, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dilluns, 17 de març de 2014, a les 08:25:59, Aurélien Gâteau va
escriure:
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014, at 8:52, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Divendres, 14 de març de 2014, a les 03:48:49, Aurélien Gâteau va
escriure:
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 4:36 AM, Markus Slopianka kamika...@gmx.de wrote:
On Monday 17 March 2014 18:15:09 Kevin Ottens wrote:
Now, the last point... What else do we want to move from KDE Frameworks
to
KDE Porting Aids? Aleix and Aaron proposed the following content for KDE
Porting Aids:
Hi,
I started working on how to handle Qt based translations, and make it as
simple as possible to work with for framework maintainers as well as
framework users.
I picked KBookmarks as my guinea pig and got to the point where
kbookmarkdialogtest shows a translated dialog.
Here is how it
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014, at 5:37, Aleix Pol wrote:
Maybe coming up with the list of modules now is not the most useful
thing now.
Can we maybe agree that we want an extra value in the framework.yaml
file indicating the maturity of the project?
+1
Aurélien
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Aurélien Gâteau agat...@kde.org wrote:
Hi,
I started working on how to handle Qt based translations, and make it as
simple as possible to work with for framework maintainers as well as
framework users.
I picked KBookmarks as my guinea pig and got to the
On Tuesday 18 March 2014 14:20:53 Aleix Pol wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Aurélien Gâteau agat...@kde.org wrote:
Hi,
I started working on how to handle Qt based translations, and make it as
simple as possible to work with for framework maintainers as well as
framework users.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116873/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kinit
Description
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Alex Merry alex.me...@kde.org wrote:
On 17/03/14 11:57, Alex Merry wrote:
On 15/03/14 19:04, Aleix Pol wrote:
I do agree that having an emoticons set together with kemoticons can be
very helpful and simplify the usage of the module. Also, it doesn't
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014, at 6:20, Aleix Pol wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Aurélien Gâteau [1]agat...@kde.org
wrote:
Hi,
I started working on how to handle Qt based translations, and make it
as
simple as possible to work with for framework maintainers as well as
framework users.
I
Hello everyone,
This is the minutes of the Week 12 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on
#kde-devel at 4pm Paris time.
Were present: afiestas, agateau, alexmerry, apol, dfaure, mck182, mgraesslin,
notmart, PovAddict, Riddell, svuorela, tosky and myself.
* afiestas reminds everybody to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116876/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kemoticons
Description
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Aurélien Gâteau agat...@kde.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014, at 6:20, Aleix Pol wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Aurélien Gâteau agat...@kde.org wrote:
Hi,
I started working on how to handle Qt based translations, and make it as
simple as
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014, at 9:07, Aleix Pol wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Aurélien Gâteau [1]agat...@kde.org
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014, at 6:20, Aleix Pol wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Aurélien Gâteau [2]agat...@kde.org
wrote:
Hi,
I started working on how to handle Qt
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116786/#review53343
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116786/
---
(Updated March 18, 2014, 4:56 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116866/
---
(Updated March 18, 2014, 10:25 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116866/#review53347
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Alex Merry
On March 18, 2014, 5:25
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116866/#review53348
---
src/kguiaddons_config.h.cmake
On March 18, 2014, 10:47 a.m., Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
src/kguiaddons_config.h.cmake, line 2
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116866/diff/3/?file=255187#file255187line2
Do these copyright lines really apply to this new file? I think you
should include just your own name (since
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116866/
---
(Updated March 18, 2014, 10:51 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
Hello,
On Monday 17 March 2014 22:53:25 Mario Fux KDE ML wrote:
Am Montag, 17. März 2014, 18.15:09 schrieb Kevin Ottens:
Porting Aids:
* kde4support (obvious);
Just that it doesn't get forgotten I'd like to second Aarons (or who it was)
proposal to rename kde4support to kdelibs4support
On Monday 17 March 2014 20:14:24 John Layt wrote:
On 17 March 2014 18:15, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote:
I think that list makes sense. Is there anyone who couldn't sleep at night
if those were in KDE Porting Aids?
+1 to this strategy, although some bikeshedding on the portingaids
name
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116879/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kcoreaddons
Description
Hello,
On Tuesday 18 March 2014 13:37:01 Aleix Pol wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 4:36 AM, Markus Slopianka kamika...@gmx.de wrote:
On Monday 17 March 2014 18:15:09 Kevin Ottens wrote:
Now, the last point... What else do we want to move from KDE Frameworks
to
KDE Porting Aids?
Hi all,
as I mentioned in the last couple of tuesday meetings, in Plasma we have
several QML plugins that don't depend from Plasma at all, but are bound just
to either Qt or just one framework (should ideally become the way to use the
framework from QML)
what we currently have is:
* dirmodel:
On Monday 17 March 2014 18:15:09 Kevin Ottens wrote:
Now, the last point... What else do we want to move from KDE Frameworks to
KDE Porting Aids? Aleix and Aaron proposed the following content for KDE
Porting Aids:
* kde4support (obvious);
* khtml (planned for a long time);
* kjs
On Tuesday 18 March 2014 13:37:01 Aleix Pol wrote:
Can we maybe agree that we want an extra value in the framework.yaml file
indicating the maturity of the project?
It's not about maturity, it's about security. QtWebKit is no longer maintained
by Digia and I am not aware that anybody stepped
On Tuesday 18 March 2014 19:37:59 Marco Martin wrote:
what we currently have is:
* dirmodel: is a binding to kdirmodel - KIO? (i would probably not release
it yet but waiting to have folderview done so needed features are more
clear)
Would make sense in a KIO import indeed.
* draganddrop Qt
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 5:20 AM, Alex Merry alex.me...@kde.org wrote:
On 17/03/14 19:35, Shivam Makkar wrote:
also I want to know how can i start kded5
when I run command
kded5
or
kdeinit5
i get
kded5(16341)/(default) QXcbSessionManager::QXcbSessionManager: Qt:
Session
On Tuesday 18 March 2014, Kevin Ottens wrote:
It could be replaced with
QGuiApplication::styleHints()-startDragDistance(). It would then have the
same dependencies than QtExtraComponents (delta KIconThemes) and could be
merged there.
Removed qwidgets dependency.
The problem i see in
Hi,
getting an existing directory is still broken with current frameworks
integration. A call of:
QString dir = QFileDialog::getExistingDirectory();
results in this image: http://wstaw.org/m/2014/03/18/plasma-desktopdF1903.png
Whereas what you actually want is this:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116881/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kcoreaddons
Description
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116881/
---
(Updated March 18, 2014, 9:14 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116883/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kcoreaddons
Description
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116883/
---
(Updated March 18, 2014, 10:20 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116879/#review53369
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Alexander Richardson
On March 18,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116848/#review53370
---
Prefixing the signal with QT_MOC_COMPAT should do the trick,
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote:
Hello,
Hi,
On Monday 17 March 2014 22:53:25 Mario Fux KDE ML wrote:
Am Montag, 17. März 2014, 18.15:09 schrieb Kevin Ottens:
Porting Aids:
* kde4support (obvious);
Just that it doesn't get forgotten I'd like to second
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116747/#review53374
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116747/
---
(Updated March 18, 2014, 10:25 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116792/
---
(Updated March 18, 2014, 10:28 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116792/#review53375
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116684/#review53376
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116684/
---
(Updated March 18, 2014, 10:32 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116886/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kcompletion
Description
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116886/
---
(Updated March 18, 2014, 11:01 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116887/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kcompletion
Description
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116886/#review53379
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Aleix Pol Gonzalez
On March 18, 2014,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116879/
---
(Updated March 19, 2014, 1:47 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116879/#review53380
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116883/#review53382
---
A couple questions, one of which needs resolved, but looks
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116881/#review53383
---
I think I'd argue against bothering with getgrouplist at all
62 matches
Mail list logo
