Re: Review Request 113196: kdirwatch: include correct header for time_t and ino_t.

2013-10-12 Thread David Faure
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113196/#review41573 --- Ship it! So time_t does exist on Windows? Very interesting, I

Re: Review Request 113196: kdirwatch: include correct header for time_t and ino_t.

2013-10-12 Thread Commit Hook
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113196/#review41623 --- This review has been submitted with commit

Re: Review Request 113196: kdirwatch: include correct header for time_t and ino_t.

2013-10-12 Thread Nicolás Alvarez
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113196/ --- (Updated Oct. 13, 2013, 3:19 a.m.) Status -- This change has been

Re: Review Request 113196: kdirwatch: include correct header for time_t and ino_t.

2013-10-11 Thread Nicolás Alvarez
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113196/ --- (Updated Oct. 11, 2013, 2:25 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks.