---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122680/
---
(Updated May 6, 2015, 1:19 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On May 3, 2015, 2:34 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
I'm confused, the title say Remove KAboutData and then goes and changes
i18n while breaking it?
I mean i18n handling is relatively easy, and we have pretty good
documentation at
On mai. 3, 2015, 12:34 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
I'm confused, the title say Remove KAboutData and then goes and changes
i18n while breaking it?
I mean i18n handling is relatively easy, and we have pretty good
documentation at
On May 3, 2015, 2:34 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
I'm confused, the title say Remove KAboutData and then goes and changes
i18n while breaking it?
I mean i18n handling is relatively easy, and we have pretty good
documentation at
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122680/#review79794
---
I'm confused, the title say Remove KAboutData and then goes
On March 2, 2015, 9:06 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
Ship It!
Luigi Toscano wrote:
Please fix the extracted pot so that it is called file_qt.pot.
(personally speaking, I would strongly suggest lxde to use ki18n, but
that's another discussion)
Luigi Toscano wrote:
On Mar. 2, 2015, 9:06 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
Ship It!
Please fix the extracted pot so that it is called file_qt.pot.
(personally speaking, I would strongly suggest lxde to use ki18n, but that's
another discussion)
- Luigi
---
On Mar. 2, 2015, 5:21 a.m., Jerome Leclanche wrote:
Should we be using ::tr here instead of not translating at all?
Jerome Leclanche wrote:
Consensus on IRC six days ago was that dropping translation altogether
was fine.
I can add some ::tr but it's arguable whether some of
On Mar. 2, 2015, 9:06 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
Ship It!
Luigi Toscano wrote:
Please fix the extracted pot so that it is called file_qt.pot.
(personally speaking, I would strongly suggest lxde to use ki18n, but
that's another discussion)
Sorry, there is also another
On Mar. 2, 2015, 9:06 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
Ship It!
Luigi Toscano wrote:
Please fix the extracted pot so that it is called file_qt.pot.
(personally speaking, I would strongly suggest lxde to use ki18n, but
that's another discussion)
Luigi Toscano wrote:
On mar. 2, 2015, 8:06 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
Ship It!
Luigi Toscano wrote:
Please fix the extracted pot so that it is called file_qt.pot.
(personally speaking, I would strongly suggest lxde to use ki18n, but
that's another discussion)
Luigi Toscano wrote:
On March 2, 2015, 8:06 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
Ship It!
Luigi Toscano wrote:
Please fix the extracted pot so that it is called file_qt.pot.
(personally speaking, I would strongly suggest lxde to use ki18n, but
that's another discussion)
Luigi Toscano wrote:
On March 2, 2015, 5:21 a.m., Jerome Leclanche wrote:
Should we be using ::tr here instead of not translating at all?
Jerome Leclanche wrote:
Consensus on IRC six days ago was that dropping translation altogether
was fine.
I can add some ::tr but it's arguable whether some of
On March 2, 2015, 9:06 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
Ship It!
Luigi Toscano wrote:
Please fix the extracted pot so that it is called file_qt.pot.
(personally speaking, I would strongly suggest lxde to use ki18n, but
that's another discussion)
Luigi Toscano wrote:
On Mar. 2, 2015, 9:06 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
Ship It!
Luigi Toscano wrote:
Please fix the extracted pot so that it is called file_qt.pot.
(personally speaking, I would strongly suggest lxde to use ki18n, but
that's another discussion)
Luigi Toscano wrote:
On March 2, 2015, 9:06 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
Ship It!
Luigi Toscano wrote:
Please fix the extracted pot so that it is called file_qt.pot.
(personally speaking, I would strongly suggest lxde to use ki18n, but
that's another discussion)
Luigi Toscano wrote:
On mar. 2, 2015, 8:06 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
Ship It!
Luigi Toscano wrote:
Please fix the extracted pot so that it is called file_qt.pot.
(personally speaking, I would strongly suggest lxde to use ki18n, but
that's another discussion)
Luigi Toscano wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122680/
---
(Updated March 2, 2015, 8:02 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122680/#review76863
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Martin Gräßlin
On March 2, 2015, 9:02
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122680/
---
(Updated March 2, 2015, 3:52 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks,
On Feb. 23, 2015, 11:23 a.m., Martin Klapetek wrote:
From the docs Currently, the values set here are shown by the About box
(see KAboutDialog), used by the bug report dialog (see KBugReport), and by
the help shown on command line (see KAboutData::setupCommandLine()).
So daemon has
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122680/#review76855
---
src/runtime/main.cpp
On March 2, 2015, 4:21 a.m., Jerome Leclanche wrote:
Should we be using ::tr here instead of not translating at all?
Consensus on IRC six days ago was that dropping translation altogether was fine.
I can add some ::tr but it's arguable whether some of those values should have
been translated
On March 2, 2015, 5:21 a.m., Jerome Leclanche wrote:
Should we be using ::tr here instead of not translating at all?
Jerome Leclanche wrote:
Consensus on IRC six days ago was that dropping translation altogether
was fine.
I can add some ::tr but it's arguable whether some of
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122680/
---
(Updated March 2, 2015, 7:11 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122680/#review76862
---
I think you have to bring back (un-delete) the Messages.sh
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122680/
---
(Updated Feb. 23, 2015, 10:34 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122680/#review76462
---
From the docs Currently, the values set here are shown by the
On Feb. 23, 2015, 12:23 p.m., Martin Klapetek wrote:
From the docs Currently, the values set here are shown by the About box
(see KAboutDialog), used by the bug report dialog (see KBugReport), and by
the help shown on command line (see KAboutData::setupCommandLine()).
So daemon has
On Feb. 23, 2015, 11:14 a.m., Jerome Leclanche wrote:
That said, you're removing 2 very small dependencies there...
See the lxqt issue (especially the last few comments). Plan is to remove more
dependencies one way or another, but these two are essentially free - and
although they are
On Feb. 23, 2015, 11:23 a.m., Martin Klapetek wrote:
From the docs Currently, the values set here are shown by the About box
(see KAboutDialog), used by the bug report dialog (see KBugReport), and by
the help shown on command line (see KAboutData::setupCommandLine()).
So daemon has
On Feb. 23, 2015, 11:23 a.m., Martin Klapetek wrote:
From the docs Currently, the values set here are shown by the About box
(see KAboutDialog), used by the bug report dialog (see KBugReport), and by
the help shown on command line (see KAboutData::setupCommandLine()).
So daemon has
On Feb. 23, 2015, 11:23 a.m., Martin Klapetek wrote:
From the docs Currently, the values set here are shown by the About box
(see KAboutDialog), used by the bug report dialog (see KBugReport), and by
the help shown on command line (see KAboutData::setupCommandLine()).
So daemon has
On Feb. 23, 2015, 12:23 p.m., Martin Klapetek wrote:
From the docs Currently, the values set here are shown by the About box
(see KAboutDialog), used by the bug report dialog (see KBugReport), and by
the help shown on command line (see KAboutData::setupCommandLine()).
So daemon has
On Feb. 23, 2015, 12:23 p.m., Martin Klapetek wrote:
From the docs Currently, the values set here are shown by the About box
(see KAboutDialog), used by the bug report dialog (see KBugReport), and by
the help shown on command line (see KAboutData::setupCommandLine()).
So daemon has
On Feb. 23, 2015, 12:23 p.m., Martin Klapetek wrote:
From the docs Currently, the values set here are shown by the About box
(see KAboutDialog), used by the bug report dialog (see KBugReport), and by
the help shown on command line (see KAboutData::setupCommandLine()).
So daemon has
36 matches
Mail list logo
