Re: [kdenlive] kdenlive Digest, Vol 20, Issue 13

version, testing for > bugfix > > > as soon as they get out (16.04 branch for the moment), and stable for > > > releases (downloads not more than every month) > > > > > > > > > How relevant are PPA's now that Snap is launched? > > > >

Re: [kdenlive] New Arch Linux AUR package

Not a problem, and my pleasure. (The package is more there because I am too lazy to type out all the commands every time, but if you enjoy using them, all the better) For your information, if you look into the PKGBUILD file, there is a line commented out that says #(debug,!strip) If you

Re: [kdenlive] kdenlive Digest, Vol 20, Issue 13

ferent > > distros. A packaging guideline should be established. > > > > > > > > - site: I have no time for this; maybe I should handle the installation > > part? (want to look at Flatpak!) > > > > > >

Re: [kdenlive] kdenlive Digest, Vol 20, Issue 13

; > -- >> > > >> > > Message: 1 >> > > Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 17:52:20 -0300 >> > > From: farid abdelnour <snd.no...@gmail.com> <

Re: [kdenlive] kdenlive Digest, Vol 20, Issue 13

and stable for > > > releases (downloads not more than every month) > > > > > > > > > How relevant are PPA's now that Snap is launched? > > > > > > > > > > > > - Movit: just seen on forum that th

Re: [kdenlive] New Arch Linux AUR package

hi evert, thanks for the arch packages. 2016-06-18 15:19 GMT-03:00 Evert Vorster : > Hi there... > > Just for the information of people using Arch linux, and have the > kdenlive-git package from AUR installed. > > There is now a new package, kdenlive-release-git available. >

Re: [kdenlive] Kdenlive release cycles

:) 3x times a year, correct!  Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: tsdg...@yahoo.es Datum: 18.06.2016 20:43 (GMT+01:00) An: Harald Albrecht , kdenlive@kde.org Betreff: Re: [kdenlive] Kdenlive release cycles Next will be 16.08 not 16.10, we're not Ubuntu. 

Re: [kdenlive] New Arch Linux AUR package

On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 8:19 PM, Evert Vorster wrote: > Hi there... > > Just for the information of people using Arch linux, and have the > kdenlive-git package from AUR installed. > > There is now a new package, kdenlive-release-git available. > This package will track the

Re: [kdenlive] kdenlive Digest, Vol 20, Issue 13

Can we please stay on topic, discussion functionality, not politics? Personally, for this list I'm interested in Kdenlive's progress and not someones political views, whatever these are, and if they match mine or not. So: please stop politics and tin foil hat conspiracies. Not doing so

Re: [kdenlive] kdenlive Digest, Vol 20, Issue 13

xed for 16.08. We need to > offer > > a similar interface experience across all platforms and between different > > distros. A packaging guideline should be established. > > > > > > > > - site: I have no time for this; maybe I should handle the ins

Re: [kdenlive] Kdenlive release cycles

Hmm, I have indeed been mistaken. Applications 16.04 has also had quite a few backports lately. It's been so quiet in the other branches of kdenlive for a long time that I have actually pulled my Arch-git packages for them, leaving only the one tracking master. I might have to reconsider and

Re: [kdenlive] Kdenlive release cycles

I think the releases strategy should change, to allow professional users to report bug reports in a "stable" production environment: Mark at least one "supported" version as other projects do (LTS~ESR) and backport released bugfixes that concerns to that version. I know this implies to maintain a

Re: [kdenlive] Kdenlive release cycles

Hi there, Narcis. There really is just one main developer in Kdenlive, and it's not his full time job, it's a hobby. So, unless there is something seriously wrong with the latest released version of kdenlive, all the development effort goes into the next release. The latest release will be

Re: [kdenlive] Kdenlive release cycles

Hi there, Narcis. There is only one branch of Kdenlive, and releases are synchronized with KDE. After a release, new features are added, and then before a release some time is spent sorting out bugs. Kind regards, Evert On 18 June 2016 at 17:00, Narcis Garcia wrote: >

Re: [kdenlive] R: Re: kdenlive Digest, Vol 20, Issue 11

established. > > > > > > > > - site: I have no time for this; maybe I should handle the installation > > part? (want to look at Flatpak!) > > > > > > Yes,please join in :) > > > > What are your views? Snap,

[kdenlive] Kdenlive release cycles

How does work Kdenlive's versioning and stabilization? Are there some kind of "major", "LTS" or "stable" versions that are feature-frozen and focused about updates for bug fixing? Thanks. ___ kdenlive mailing list kdenlive@kde.org

[kdenlive] R: Re: kdenlive Digest, Vol 20, Issue 11

e D u B o r d > ❯ Filmmaker, Screenwriter, Director, 3D Animator, Dreamer. > > YouTube <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_32AyzBmFl_AXJ8mqOeAfw> | > Google+ <https://plus.google.com/+JDRichards/posts> | Twitter > <https://twitter.com/JesseDuBord> > > ___