El dimarts, 26 d’abril de 2022, a les 18:13:50 (CEST), Paul Brown va escriure:
> On Tuesday, 26 April 2022 13:46:42 CEST Zeke Williams wrote:
> > I'm thinking if I ever struck rich (wishful thinking) I would heavily
> > fund KDE. If I was in a hypothetical scenario able to provide more
> > funding
On Tuesday, 26 April 2022 13:46:42 CEST Zeke Williams wrote:
> I'm thinking if I ever struck rich (wishful thinking) I would heavily
> fund KDE. If I was in a hypothetical scenario able to provide more
> funding to kdenlive and KDE in general, would the possibility of
> making natron an official
I'm thinking if I ever struck rich (wishful thinking) I would heavily
fund KDE. If I was in a hypothetical scenario able to provide more
funding to kdenlive and KDE in general, would the possibility of
making natron an official KDE program be up for consideration? Because
natron really needs more
On Saturday, 9 April 2022 09:05:44 CEST Narcis Garcia wrote:
> I think it's not necessary TO BE if it can TO USE.
> Kdenlive projects could dialog with other projects to compatibilize
> formats, exports and APIs; and this to allow software be called each other.
>
> Not always is needed to
I think it's not necessary TO BE if it can TO USE.
Kdenlive projects could dialog with other projects to compatibilize
formats, exports and APIs; and this to allow software be called each other.
Not always is needed to reinvent the wheel but to improve each
specialized wheel to run vehicle as
Hey there Zeke.
I am a long time user/tester of Kdenlive, and I certainly won't mind more
functionality in Kdenlive.
However, people are used to their workflows, and are resistant to change,
which is something to keep in mind when extending functionality of any
program. So, if what you have in
