Hi,
Till now I used LuaRocks with VC++ on Win32 and GCC on Linux. By now
VC++ is way too bloated to be an option for me (over 2GB), and I don't
where I can configure my compiler/tool environment.
I wish to use MinGW or Cygwin instead. Is there any way to make LR use
that instead?
Thanks!
__
Do you think it could be a good idea? I wish for a self-contained Lua
encryption package, but I'd rather have it on google code or github to
allow easy development (cloning/pushing changes; wiki) and user
feedback (issues list, etc.).
___
Kepler-Project
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Cosmin Apreutesei
wrote:
> I wish to use MinGW or Cygwin instead. Is there any way to make LR use
> that instead?
Fabio definitely managed to persuade LR to work with mingw, and cygwin
support has been there for a while.
So he is the one to specifically ask, it's
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Vadim Peretokin wrote:
> It seems the documentation folder is missing some pages?
>
i only sent the documentation i generated...the rest of the documentation is
the same that is on the cvs.
now that you mentioned it...i think that a small change mus be made on th
Have you tried luacrypto (if you don't mind the dependency on
OpenSSL's libcrypto)?
--
Fabio Mascarenhas
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Cosmin Apreutesei
wrote:
> Do you think it could be a good idea? I wish for a self-contained Lua
> encryption package, but I'd rather have it on google code
Pass the /MW switch to LuaRocks' INSTALL.BAT and it should install a
LuaRocks with mingw support. But notice that right now it is compiling
packages using the old MSVCRT.DLL, not the version that LuaBinaries
(and Lua for Windows) uses, so if you are using LuaBinaries/LfW some
packages compiled with
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Fabio Mascarenhas wrote:
> (and Lua for Windows) uses, so if you are using LuaBinaries/LfW some
> packages compiled with mingw may not work 100%...
I think Cosmin wants to use a pure mingw system, in which case
everything should be fine.
What would be the situati
Can you send the relevant part of your nginx/fastcgi/wsapi
configuration? It should work fine under debian (I tested under Ubuntu
myself).
To get similar performance from nginx/xavante you will need to run
more than one Xavante instance and load-balance your requests among
them, just like you do w