Re: Solaris pam-krb5 client and MIT krb5 KDC on Linux (Eliot Lebsack)

2004-07-30 Thread Henry B. Hotz
] Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 5:55 PM To: Eliot Lebsack Subject: Re: Solaris pam-krb5 client and MIT krb5 KDC on Linux (Eliot Lebsack) You still haven't told me what happens when you try a kinit as a non-root user on your Solaris 8 machine. That was step one of the debugging procedure I gave you

RE: Solaris pam-krb5 client and MIT krb5 KDC on Linux (Eliot Lebsack)

2004-07-29 Thread Eliot Lebsack
for your attention on this issue. Regards, Eliot -Original Message- From: Henry B. Hotz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 5:55 PM To: Eliot Lebsack Subject: Re: Solaris pam-krb5 client and MIT krb5 KDC on Linux (Eliot Lebsack) You still haven't told me what

RE: Solaris pam-krb5 client and MIT krb5 KDC on Linux (Eliot Lebsack)

2004-07-29 Thread Eliot Lebsack
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eliot Lebsack Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 9:51 PM To: 'Henry B. Hotz' Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Solaris pam-krb5 client and MIT krb5 KDC on Linux (Eliot Lebsack) Henry, I just managed to get it working. It turns out

RE: Solaris pam-krb5 client and MIT krb5 KDC on Linux (Eliot Lebsack)

2004-07-28 Thread Eliot Lebsack
] The MITRE CorporationBedford, MA -Original Message- From: Henry B. Hotz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 3:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Eliot Lebsack Subject: Re: Solaris pam-krb5 client and MIT krb5 KDC on Linux (Eliot Lebsack

RE: Solaris pam-krb5 client and MIT krb5 KDC on Linux (Eliot Lebsack)

2004-07-28 Thread Eliot Lebsack
: Solaris pam-krb5 client and MIT krb5 KDC on Linux (Eliot Lebsack) Hi! Try commenting out pam_dhkeys.so from your pam.conf - if you have it. If it doesn't solve the problem, put pam in debug mode, adding something like: auth.debug /etc/pam_debug to your /etc/syslog.conf, and sending

Re: Solaris pam-krb5 client and MIT krb5 KDC on Linux (Eliot Lebsack)

2004-07-28 Thread Henry B. Hotz
: Solaris pam-krb5 client and MIT krb5 KDC on Linux (Eliot Lebsack) Right, that's the problem. You need to set -rw-r--r-- (644) for krb5.conf. Those permissions are correct for krb5.keytab. Both should be root owned. On Jul 26, 2004, at 1:05 PM, Eliot Lebsack wrote: Henry, Just checked

RE: Solaris pam-krb5 client and MIT krb5 KDC on Linux (Eliot Lebsack)

2004-07-27 Thread Eliot Lebsack
CorporationBedford, MA -Original Message- From: Henry B. Hotz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 6:20 PM To: Eliot Lebsack Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Solaris pam-krb5 client and MIT krb5 KDC on Linux (Eliot Lebsack) Right, that's the problem. You

Re: Solaris pam-krb5 client and MIT krb5 KDC on Linux (Eliot Lebsack)

2004-07-27 Thread Douglas E. Engert
Bedford, MA -Original Message- From: Henry B. Hotz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 6:20 PM To: Eliot Lebsack Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Solaris pam-krb5 client and MIT krb5 KDC on Linux (Eliot Lebsack) Right, that's the problem. You need to set -rw

Re: Solaris pam-krb5 client and MIT krb5 KDC on Linux (Eliot Lebsack)

2004-07-27 Thread Henry B. Hotz
Bedford, MA -Original Message- From: Henry B. Hotz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 6:20 PM To: Eliot Lebsack Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Solaris pam-krb5 client and MIT krb5 KDC on Linux (Eliot Lebsack) Right, that's the problem. You need

Re: Solaris pam-krb5 client and MIT krb5 KDC on Linux (Eliot Lebsack)

2004-07-26 Thread Henry B. Hotz
If it works as root, but not as a user, then it sounds like a permissions problem. Is /etc/krb5/krb5.conf world-readable? On Jul 26, 2004, at 9:00 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:55:02 -0400 From: Eliot Lebsack [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Solaris

RE: Solaris pam-krb5 client and MIT krb5 KDC on Linux (Eliot Lebsack)

2004-07-26 Thread Eliot Lebsack
Communications Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] The MITRE CorporationBedford, MA -Original Message- From: Henry B. Hotz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 3:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Eliot Lebsack Subject: Re: Solaris pam-krb5 client and MIT krb5 KDC

RE: Solaris pam-krb5 client and MIT krb5 KDC on Linux (Eliot Lebsack)

2004-07-26 Thread Kevin L. Mitchell
On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 16:05, Eliot Lebsack wrote: Just checked - the permissions are -rw--- (0600). Just checked what? Your krb5.conf? If so, then that's your problem. As Henry told you: If it works as root, but not as a user, then it sounds like a permissions problem. Is

RE: Solaris pam-krb5 client and MIT krb5 KDC on Linux (Eliot Lebsack)

2004-07-26 Thread Eliot Lebsack
Bedford, MA -Original Message- From: Kevin L. Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 4:23 PM To: Eliot Lebsack Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Solaris pam-krb5 client and MIT krb5 KDC on Linux (Eliot Lebsack) On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 16:05, Eliot Lebsack wrote: Just

RE: Solaris pam-krb5 client and MIT krb5 KDC on Linux (Eliot Lebsack)

2004-07-26 Thread Kevin L. Mitchell
On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 16:47, Eliot Lebsack wrote: I changed the permissions to -rw-r--r-- (chmod +r) for /etc/krb5/krb5.conf, and still get the same behavior. What are the permissions on the /etc/krb5 directory? (Should be 0755...) -- Kevin L. Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc

RE: Solaris pam-krb5 client and MIT krb5 KDC on Linux (Eliot Lebsack)

2004-07-26 Thread Eliot Lebsack
: Kevin L. Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 4:55 PM To: Eliot Lebsack Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Solaris pam-krb5 client and MIT krb5 KDC on Linux (Eliot Lebsack) On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 16:47, Eliot Lebsack wrote: I changed the permissions to -rw-r--r

Re: Solaris pam-krb5 client and MIT krb5 KDC on Linux (Eliot Lebsack)

2004-07-26 Thread Henry B. Hotz
-Original Message- From: Henry B. Hotz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 3:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Eliot Lebsack Subject: Re: Solaris pam-krb5 client and MIT krb5 KDC on Linux (Eliot Lebsack) If it works as root, but not as a user, then it sounds like a permissions