✅ PASS: Test report for kernel 5.14.14-200.fc34 (fedora-34)

2021-10-20 Thread CKI Project
Hello, We ran automated tests on the following kernel build: Kernel package: kernel-5.14.14-200.fc34 Task URL: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=77572151 The results of these automated tests are provided below. Overall result: PASSED Tests: OK

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/0] Enable bpf selftests build again

2021-10-20 Thread Herton R. Krzesinski (via Email Bridge)
From: Herton R. Krzesinski on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1435#note_709444857 Acked-by: Herton R. Krzesinski (via approve button) ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/0] Enable bpf selftests build again

2021-10-20 Thread Justin M. Forbes (via Email Bridge)
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1435#note_709420265 Acked-by: Justin M. Forbes (via approve button) ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email

[OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/0] Enable bpf selftests build again

2021-10-20 Thread Jiri Olsa (via Email Bridge)
From: Jiri Olsa on gitlab.com Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1435 NOTE: Truncated patchset since committer email 'jo...@kernel.org' does not match the submitter's GitLab public email address 'jo...@redhat.com'. Fixes to enable bpf selftest rpm

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2] redhat/configs: create a separate config for gcov options

2021-10-20 Thread Justin M. Forbes (via Email Bridge)
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1433#note_709390882 I am generally okay with this approach. As a separate MR from someone, it might be interesting to have the config scripts actually do a full check, but instead of error, just print

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2] redhat/configs: create a separate config for gcov options

2021-10-20 Thread Don Zickus (via Email Bridge)
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1433#note_709380590 @jstancek - interesting approach. I am open to this latest change. We might be able to use something similar for -rt and/or -auto and future variants. @jmflinuxtx - any thoughts on this

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2] redhat/configs: create a separate config for gcov options

2021-10-20 Thread Don Zickus (via Email Bridge)
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1433#note_709358307 Just an FYI, the CKI team is looking to heavily use gcov as part of the testing process. In fact, this might be required for us to get certified for Functional Safety Linux in Auto. So

[OS-BUILD PATCHv2] redhat/configs: create a separate config for gcov options

2021-10-20 Thread Jan Stancek (via Email Bridge)
From: Jan Stancek redhat/configs: create a separate config for gcov options Use existing config infrastructure to build and validate gcov-enabled configs. Meaning for each arch we also apply GCOV options on top and validate it. From same options dir (kgcov) build also partial config, which

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat: relax configchecks for gcov build

2021-10-20 Thread Jan Stancek (via Email Bridge)
From: Jan Stancek on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1433#note_709281351 > I am not sure if that hides other things that should be enabled It does, but gcov was always best-effort kind of feature. It's not built by default in ARK or RHEL. So I didn't think