Re: [PATCH] Removes rediffall.sh

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Miguel Flores Silverio wrote: > After dicussing with Kernel Development team arrived to > the conclusion that this is an old script and not needed > anymore. > > Signed-off-by: Miguel Flores Silverio > --- >

Re: [PATCH] fast-build.sh rpmbuild combo for faster compilation

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Prarit Bhargava wrote: > On 06/10/2016 03:42 PM, Miguel Flores Silverio wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Miguel Flores Silverio >> --- >> scripts/fast-build.sh | 13 + >> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) >> create

Re: [PATCH] fast-build.sh rpmbuild combo for faster compilation

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Jarod Wilson <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 09:15:52PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Jarod Wilson <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: >> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 12:42:59PM -0700, Miguel Flore

Re: [PATCH] fast-build.sh rpmbuild combo for faster compilation

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 12:42:59PM -0700, Miguel Flores Silverio wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Miguel Flores Silverio >> --- >> scripts/fast-build.sh | 13 + >> 1 file changed, 13

F24 4.6.y rebase plans

Hi All, The upstream stable maintainers released kernels 4.5.7 and 4.6.2 yesterday. I thought I would send a brief word about how the rebase of F24 to 4.6.y will happen. We'll ship 4.5.7 as the final 4.5.y update and have that available as the 0-day update for the F24 release on June 14th.

Re: [PATCH] config: x86: stop pretending to be an Lguest guest

On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 4:54 AM, Paul Bolle <pebo...@tiscali.nl> wrote: > Hi Josh, > > On do, 2016-04-14 at 13:17 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: >> On do, 2016-04-14 at 07:09 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: >> > lguest is a toy, and one that doesn't work very well it seem

Re: possible debug config extension

On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote: > Hi. > > There could be really handy to have more debug options enabled in debug > kernel. Namely: > > CONFIG_PREEMPT=y That's not a debug option. > CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT=y > CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG=y This is already enabled. >

Re: [PATCH] config: arm64: Enable generic PCI host bridge

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Jeremy Linton wrote: > On 05/12/2016 02:59 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > > The ARM Juno development platform's PCIe is supported > by the generic PCI host driver. Enable it so that PCIe > attached peripherals work.

Re: secure boot and hibernation

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Josh Boyer <jwbo...@fedoraproject.org> > wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> >> wrote: >&

Re: secure boot and hibernation

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > Hi, > > Do Fedora kernels inhibit hibernation (linux suspend to disk) when > UEFI Secure Boot is enabled? I'm pretty sure the answer is yes but I'd Yes. Hibernation is not possible if SB is enabled. > rather not

Re: [BUG] There is a calltrace of cryptomgr_test whenbooting system.

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 1:35 AM, wyang wrote: > Hi folks, > > I am not sure if its righ to send BUG report to the ML, if not, please > correct me, and help me forward it to right ML. Bug reports are best submitted at https://bugzilla.redhat.com. That way they are tracked. >

Re: [PATCH] Remove all references to unknown Kconfig symbols

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Paul Bolle <pebo...@tiscali.nl> wrote: > On vr, 2016-04-15 at 10:35 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: >> I've applied the patch locally and it will be in the next rawhide >> build. Thanks again Paul. > > (I still hope to scan the comments one of

Re: [PATCH] Remove all references to unknown Kconfig symbols

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Adam Jackson <a...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2016-04-14 at 20:20 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > >> Thanks for this. I'm going to let Peter weigh in on the ARM options. >> The rest look fine (lol KDBUS), but I'll verify a few tomorrow. Wa

Re: [PATCH] Remove all references to unknown Kconfig symbols

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Paul Bolle wrote: > Reported-by: Paul Bolle > --- > 0) This is a rerun of https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ > kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/LC2TIYKPWNJNE2L34C26HAUMOUK4BBPK/ > on current master. > > 1)

Re: Fix compile issue with drivers/block/null_blk.c

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 4:00 PM, John Dulaney wrote: > From d6f1f292c3963c4f10fe0bf6de5fa79ff3e1ef30 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: John Dulaney > Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 03:44:35 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH] Patch to fix compile issue with

Re: Build break: "Upstream fix for stmmac driver regressions (AllWinner Gb NICs) until it lands upstream"

On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Josh Boyer <jwbo...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 8:03 AM, <notificati...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: >>> From bf70cee80d99f5d

Build break: "Upstream fix for stmmac driver regressions (AllWinner Gb NICs) until it lands upstream"

On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 8:03 AM, wrote: > From bf70cee80d99f5d7adb0e346fba06b006e080062 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Peter Robinson > Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 12:01:49 + > Subject: Upstream fix for stmmac driver regressions (AllWinner

Re: Disabling early microcode, because kernel does not support it. CONFIG_MICROCODE_[AMD|INTEL]_EARLY!=y

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 5:16 AM, Josh Boyer <jwbo...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:13 AM, Paul Bolle <pebo...@tiscali.nl> wrote: >>> On zo, 2016-03

Re: Disabling early microcode, because kernel does not support it. CONFIG_MICROCODE_[AMD|INTEL]_EARLY!=y

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:13 AM, Paul Bolle <pebo...@tiscali.nl> wrote: > On zo, 2016-03-06 at 22:02 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >> The functionality is not disabled in the kernel. It was merged into the >> main driver and the config options no longer exist. If you aren't

Re: our chat in #fedora-kernel

On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Corey Sheldon wrote: > Josh, > Adding the Fedora kernel list on CC. > Been updating my blog with news of the respins Southern_Gentlemen > (fas: jbwillia) makes when new kernels make it to updates, like > 4.4.2-301 did last night. >

Re: 4.4 rebase coming to F23 soon

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > Jóhann_B._Guðmundsson wrote: > >> Arguably the regression in 4.4 with drm/i915 that causes screen >> flickering in dual monitor setups needs to be looked at before this gets >> released since it will get

Re: Tweaks to kernel core modules filtering

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 2:37 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > Hi All, > > This is a small series of changes to the filtering of kernel modules from > core. Each patch is a mostly self contained subject like usb/drm/network > protocols. I split them out to separate patches just

Re: Tweaks to kernel core modules filtering

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Josh Boyer <jwbo...@fedoraproject.org> > wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 2:37 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi All, &g

Re: Tweaks to kernel core modules filtering

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: > > > On 01/15/2016 07:37 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> This is a small series of changes to the filtering of kernel modules from >> core. Each patch is a mostly self contained subject like

Re: Tweaks to kernel core modules filtering

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 03:01:34PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: > >>And since the kernel modular change was aimed to achieve the smallest as > >>well as the most flexible footprint I have to ask is there something > >>preventing putting every kernel module in it's own sub package ( >

Re: [PATCH] Disable deprecated rfkill-input driver

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > On 11-01-16 20:21, Josh Boyer wrote: >> >> On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Bastien Nocera <bnoc...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> From:

Re: [PATCH] Disable deprecated rfkill-input driver

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Bastien Nocera <had...@hadess.net> wrote: > On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 14:21 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Bastien Nocera <bnoc...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> > From: Bastien Nocera <had...@

Re: [PATCH] Disable deprecated rfkill-input driver

On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > From: Bastien Nocera > > As noted in https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/rfkill.txt > rfkill-input is deprecated, and rfkill keys are handled in user-space. That may be what the document says,

Re: Policy for driver backports?

Adding the kernel list on CC because this is a good question and there's no reason to not answer a broader number of people. On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > Other than the bug I filed, 4.3 is missing two things for full Dell Skylake > support: > > The

4.3 rebase in F23 updates-testing

Hello, The 4.3.3 kernel has been pushed to updates-testing for F23. As of right now, it has a +12 karma score. Given that it is a major release rebase, we're going to wait at least a few days to see how it fares. If you are so inclined, testing would be appreciated. As usual, please give

Re: F23 4.3 rebase plan

On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 5:36 AM, wrote: > Hi Josh, > > Any update on F23 kernel rebase to 4.3 now that the holiday period has > passed? I'm interested in Skylake GPU support. Should be rebased by the end of the week. There are a number of CVE fixes that need to go in

Re: [PATCH] Add PCI mode LPSS support on BYT

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > From: Bastien Nocera > > --- > config-x86-generic | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/config-x86-generic b/config-x86-generic > index 19daf7c..3de8d6c 100644 > ---

Re: [PATCH] Really enable SPI support for BayTrail/CherryTrail

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 9:03 AM, wrote: > From: Bastien Nocera > > e59c4109 enabled the SPI driver for those platforms, but didn't enable > any of the subsystems it needs, resulting in a no-op. > --- > config-x86-generic | 7 +++ > 1 file changed, 7

Re: [PATCH] Make GPIO pinctrl for CherryTrail builtin

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > From: Bastien Nocera > > As for the BayTrail one. > --- > config-x86-generic | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/config-x86-generic b/config-x86-generic > index

Re: [PATCH] Make GPIO pinctrl for CherryTrail builtin

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > - Original Message - >> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: >> > From: Bastien Nocera >> > >> > As for the BayTrail one. >> > --- >> >

Re: F23 4.3 rebase plan

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:31:03AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >> > Users' list and on Stack Exchange. It wasn't like a gigantic flood of >> > hundreds, but "more than one arou

Re: F23 4.3 rebase plan

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:50:27AM -0600, Justin Forbes wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Josh Boyer <jwbo...@fedoraproject.org> > wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:20:48AM -0600, Justin Forbes wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Josh Bo

Re: F23 4.3 rebase plan

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 03:55:47PM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > >> On 11/20/2015 04:13 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > >> >Hi All, > >> > > >> >Really no different from any of the last major version rebases we've > >> >done. We'll likely r

Re: F23 4.3 rebase plan

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:20:48AM -0600, Justin Forbes wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Josh Boyer <jwbo...@fedoraproject.org> > wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 03:55:47PM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > > Does it make sense to consider j

Re: F23 4.3 rebase plan

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 09:48:45AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >> It won't be submitted until January. We don't want to do a major rebase >> the week before most of us go away on

Re: F23 4.3 rebase plan

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:15:36AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >> Depends. Where are you seeing the requests and what for? I'm asking >> because I have seen a few, but the demand has

Re: Patch: BuildRequire openssl openssl-devel on %{ix86} x86_64

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Josh Boyer <jwbo...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis <fed...@leemhuis.info> > wrote: >> Lo! Consider applying below patch for rawhide and the stabilization >> branch. It fixes a build pro

Re: Patch: BuildRequire openssl openssl-devel on %{ix86} x86_64

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Lo! Consider applying below patch for rawhide and the stabilization > branch. It fixes a build problem in mock on %{ix86} x86_64 when setting > %signmodules to 0 in kernel.spec. The build fails because Linux since >

Re: Building Fedora kernel RPM in mock

On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote: > I am hitting this pesign issue when trying to (locally) build a custom > kernel RPM with mock: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283475 > > Is there any way to work around this before the pesign update

Re: Rawhide: Disabling early microcode, because kernel does not support it

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > why? AFAIR that was the solution for Haswell/TSX troubles disabled with > newer microcode > > [root@rawhide ~]# dracut -f > Disabling early microcode, because kernel does not support it. >

Re: Can't build kernel RPM with local (non-git) patch

On Nov 7, 2015 3:07 PM, "Peter Robinson" wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 7:59 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote: > > I just installed F23 (coming from F21) and encountered an irritating > > new behavior when trying to build a custom kernel RPM. > > > > Patch

Re: kdbus module being removed from Rawhide

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Paul Moore <pmo...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thursday, October 29, 2015 07:36:13 PM Josh Boyer wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> We will be removing the kdbus driver from Rawhide kernels before the >> 4.3 final release upstream. Realistically,

Re: NumaChip APIC support

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote: > On 09/25/2015 05:58 AM, Daniel J Blueman wrote: >> Hi Fedora kernel team, >> >> What possibility is there of enabling CONFIG_X86_NUMACHIP in the >> Fedora kernel, given it's been enabled in the CentOS Plus and Ubuntu >>

Re: [PATCH] run ldconfig against kernel-tools-libs not kernel-tools

On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > --- > kernel.spec | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel.spec b/kernel.spec > index d2de44c..df65aab 100644 > --- a/kernel.spec > +++ b/kernel.spec > @@ -1781,10 +1781,10

Re: [PATCH] Enable CHECKPOINT_RESTORE on power64le for CRIU feature

On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 08:21:22PM +0300, Andrey Wagin wrote: > 2015-09-04 20:15 GMT+03:00 Josh Boyer <jwbo...@fedoraproject.org>: > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Andrey Wagin <ava...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> 2015-09-04 20:00 GMT+03:00 Josh Boyer <jwbo...@fedora

Re: [PATCH] Enable CHECKPOINT_RESTORE on arm and aarch64 for CRIU feature

On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 09:47:46AM +0300, Andrey Vagin wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040486 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146995 > > Cc: a...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Signed-off-by: Andrey Vagin Applied and pushed out. It will be in

Re: [PATCH] Enable CHECKPOINT_RESTORE on power64le for CRIU feature

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Andrey Vagin wrote: > Signed-off-by: Andrey Vagin > --- > config-powerpc64le | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/config-powerpc64le b/config-powerpc64le > index 48c8c0d..7d9f3fc 100644 > ---

Re: [PATCH] Enable CHECKPOINT_RESTORE on power64le for CRIU feature

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Andrey Wagin <ava...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2015-09-04 20:00 GMT+03:00 Josh Boyer <jwbo...@fedoraproject.org>: >> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Andrey Vagin <ava...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Andrey Vagin <ava...@open

Re: kernel.git branch f21/22 - Fix iscsi issue (rhbz 1253789) - Missing ApplyPatch line in kernel.spec

On Aug 17, 2015 1:16 PM, Donavan Lance tusklah...@gmail.com wrote: In the f21 and f22 branch the ApplyPatch line is missing for: #rhbz 1253789 Patch510: iSCSI-let-session-recovery_tmo-sysfs-writes-persist.patch I'm not sure if this was intentional or an oversight due to the new way patches

Re: [PATCH] kexec/uefi: copy secure boot flag in boot params across kexec reboot

On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 3:41 AM, Dave Young dyo...@redhat.com wrote: Kexec reboot in case secure boot enabled does not keep the secure boot mode in new kernel, so later one can load unsigned kernel via legacy kexec_load. Hm. Wasn't there code being written so that one could disable legacy kexec

Re: [PATCH] Add 10-yama-ptrace.conf (rhbz 1209492)

On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Paul Moore pmo...@redhat.com wrote: On Saturday, August 01, 2015 10:08:14 PM Mark Wielaard wrote: On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 03:49:18PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 09:39 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Mark Wielaard

Re: [kernel/f21] Make sure acpi brightness_switch is disabled (like forever in Fedora)

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, On 29-07-15 17:06, Josh Boyer wrote: On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote: Hi Josh, On 07/28

Re: failed to build kernel from kernel-4.2.0-0.rc3.git3.1.fc23.src.rpm

On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Masami Ichikawa masami...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I tried to rebuild kernel from kernel-4.2.0-0.rc3.git3.1.fc23.src.rpm but I got following error. Applying: lib/cpumask: Make CPUMASK_OFFSTACK usable without debug dependency Applying: amd-xgbe-a0: Add support

Re: kernel panics 4.0.8-300.fc22.x86_64

On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 3:52 AM, Lance Lassetter lancelasset...@gmail.com wrote: I haven't debugged yet but I'm getting kernel panics on reboot of 4.0.8-300. The machine is a 2008 manufactured Dell XPS 625 (one of the first Dell Alienware machines). Please file a bug in bugzilla. Include

Re: kdbus and Fedora

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com wrote: On 24.06.2015 17:17, Josh Boyer wrote: On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On (Wed) 06 May 2015 [11:45:38

Re: kdbus and Fedora

On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 10:32:53 -0400 Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote: I just pushed this to git and started a build. It will be in rawhide tomorrow with the 4.2.0-0.rc1.git2.1 kernel. (I was waiting for rc1 before

Re: [PATCH] Add 10-yama-ptrace.conf (rhbz 1209492)

On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Mark Wielaard m...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 16:56 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 09:11 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Mark Wielaard m...@redhat.com wrote: We don't ship any other sysctl files

Re: minor updates for ARM and Power

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Just some small cleanups and updates for ARM* and Power. Had to fixup Subject on 3/3, but no big deal. Committed locally and it will go out with the next build. josh ___

Re: why are these drivers missing from the Fedora kernel?

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Ranjan Maitra maitra.mbox.igno...@inbox.com wrote: Hi, I posted this earlier but did not get a response, so here's hoping that someone who notices has more suggestions. Most likely because what you've written doesn't make a whole lot of sense. Your email

Re: Initial aarch64 config updates for 4.2

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Below are a few minor updates for aarch64 in 4.2, didn't want to send too many in fear of getting the process screwed up. Feedback welcomne :) They look great. I was initially surprised to see an added changelog in

Re: why are these drivers missing from the Fedora kernel?

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Ranjan Maitra maitra.mbox.igno...@inbox.com wrote: Hi, Thank you. I am sorry that my previous e-mail was not clear. -Original Message- From: jwbo...@fedoraproject.org Sent: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 08:34:27 -0400 To: maitra.mbox.igno...@inbox.com Subject:

Re: Fedora kernel git tree and package maintenance

On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Hi All, The kernel team has been running an exploded git tree since Flock last year. This has been mostly a nice to have, but several people have commented on how useful it is for them when debugging issues, etc

Re: [PATCH] Add 10-yama-ptrace.conf (rhbz 1209492)

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:04 AM, Mark Wielaard m...@redhat.com wrote: This fixes the yama bug #1209492 but lets administrators still add extra restrictions if desired. This patch should apply as is against both f22 and master. --- 10-yama-ptrace.conf | 30 ++

Fedora kernel git tree and package maintenance

Hi All, The kernel team has been running an exploded git tree since Flock last year. This has been mostly a nice to have, but several people have commented on how useful it is for them when debugging issues, etc. Having the exploded sources with the patches we carry included lets them easily see

Re: kernel 4.1-rc7 deadlock

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Morten Stevens mstev...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Hi Josh, Could you please add this patch to the 4.1-rc8 kernel for rawhide? https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/14/169 Done. I'd been watching that thread as well. As an aside, it is better to send such requests to

Re: sizeof - kernel modules

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 1:45 PM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 7:38 PM, poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote: # du -hs /lib/modules/4.0.5-300.fc22.i686/ | awk '{print $1}' 42M kernel-modules-4.0.5-300.fc22.i686.rpm ... 17M

Re: OSSEC Alert - annun10 - Level 13 - Non standard syslog message (size too large).

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Lance Lassetter lancelasset...@gmail.com wrote: Just upgraded to FC22. And spamd crashes alot. Please report a bug in bugzilla against the spamassassin component. I don't see how anything here is related to the kernel. josh

Re: Backporting vmmouse kernel support to Fedora-22 kernel ?

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote: See above, I think that if I push out xorg-x11-drv-vmmouse 3.0.99 as a F-22 update, and you add a Conflicts for older versions to the kernel spec that we are then good to go. Josh, how are we going to move forward

[PATCH] Drop compile-fixes and upstream-reverts patches

We very very rarely use these. The last time compile-fixes.patch was used was over 3 years ago. The upstream-reverts.patch has literally never been used since Fedora switched to git. We tend to apply the reverts as stand-alone patches anyway, and compile fixes are generally better as

Re: Backporting vmmouse kernel support to Fedora-22 kernel ?

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, On 15-05-15 15:09, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 15-05-15 14:56, Josh Boyer wrote: On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 5:04 AM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote: Hi Josh, Throwing kernel@ on CC. I'm mailing

Re: Backporting vmmouse kernel support to Fedora-22 kernel ?

On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 5:04 AM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote: Hi Josh, Throwing kernel@ on CC. I'm mailing you because of: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214474 Rather then hacking around the problem discussed there (and then at one point in time needing to remove

Re: [PATCH] kernel.spec: no more files in /boot

On May 8, 2015 11:38 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote: On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 10:08:56PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 04:29:11PM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote: Hmm. If don't know off the top of my head if Fedora cloud images have a separate

Re: [PATCH] kernel.spec: no more files in /boot

On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 1:22 PM, har...@redhat.com wrote: From: Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com This patch is to install everything to /lib/modules/$KERNEL_VERSION and only have %ghost files for /boot files. Installation in %posttrans with kernel-install should work already. F20: systemd =

Re: [PATCH] kernel.spec: no more files in /boot

On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 10:29:36AM -0400, Don Zickus wrote: On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 11:34:41AM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote: Meh, not in CC and not subscribed to kernel-list. Anyway... On 04.05.2015 19:57, Tom Callaway wrote: On 05/04/2015 01:49 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: So if I

Re: kdbus and Fedora

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On (Wed) 06 May 2015 [11:45:38], Harald Hoyer wrote: One possibility is to enable kdbus by default until alpha phase. The problem with that is all systemd testing is useless once we're out of Alpha. Similar things

Re: kdbus and Fedora

On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com wrote: On 05.05.2015 19:50, Josh Boyer wrote: Hi All, Harald and I were recently talking about kdbus and how it plays into Fedora. Right now, the kernel-playground COPR is carrying the kdbus patches, but that isn't widely used

kdbus and Fedora

Hi All, Harald and I were recently talking about kdbus and how it plays into Fedora. Right now, the kernel-playground COPR is carrying the kdbus patches, but that isn't widely used and isn't included in a broad test base. Obviously our distribution is heavily entwined with D-Bus and we were

Re: [PATCH] kernel.spec: no more files in /boot

On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 07:32:39PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 04.05.2015 um 19:22 schrieb har...@redhat.com: From: Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com This patch is to install everything to /lib/modules/$KERNEL_VERSION and only have %ghost files for /boot files. Installation in

Re: Toshiba backlight patch for Fedora kernels

On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 5:18 AM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote: Hi Josh, I've a patch for the Toshiba ACPI kernel driver fixing backlight issues on various models, it fixes these 2 bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206036

Re: [PATCH] enable mvebu on the lpae kernel. it has LPAE, there is boards that can have more than 4GiB ram. anaconda defaults to installing LPAE when the hardware supports it, so any install today wil

On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote: Signed-off-by: Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- config-armv7 | 51 --- config-armv7-generic | 51 +++

Re: 4.0 final, 4.1 merge window, and us

On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 08:44:20AM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 16.04.2015 14:12, Josh Boyer wrote: On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 6:17 AM, James Harrison jamesaharriso...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: I took the src RPM from rawhide and compiled

Re: [fedora-arm] RFE: Enable CONFIG_R8188EU (from staging) in Fedora (ARM) kernels

On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, The usb wifi modules supported by CONFIG_R8188EU (from staging) are used on quite a few Allwinner ARM boards which we now support, can the (staging) driver for these be enabled please? If not in general, then at

Re: ntfs kernel module

On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Jeff Sadowski jeff.sadow...@gmail.com wrote: I was wondering why only ntfs-3g method of mounting ntfs partitions is all that is supported? If the ntfs kernel module was build then it would be all that should be needed to boot from an ntfs partition. We don't

Re: ntfs kernel module

On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Jeff Sadowski jeff.sadow...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 5:36 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Jeff Sadowski jeff.sadow...@gmail.com wrote: I was wondering why only ntfs-3g method of mounting ntfs

i686 kernel bug priority plan

Hello Fellow Contributors! Our kernel team has been adrift in bugs roughly forever. The time we spend on triage is time we don't get to spend fixing substantial bugs on hardware lots of people are using, especially new/emergent hardware. We have spoken previously about the difficulty of kernel

Re: i686 kernel bug priority plan

On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:30 AM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Hello Fellow Contributors! [...] It's possible down the road that, if there is no community interest in i686, the project might look at other options

Fwd: [kernel] Add patch to fix aarch64 KVM bug with module loading (rhbz 1194366).

Please fast-forward merge this change to the f22 branch and push that out. josh -- Forwarded message -- From: Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@fedoraproject.org Date: Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:26 PM Subject: [kernel] Add patch to fix aarch64 KVM bug with module loading (rhbz 1194366). To:

kernel 4.0-rc1

Hi All, The upstream kernel bumped the major version to 4.0-rc1 yesterday. Barring any unforeseen local test failures, the 4.0-rc1 build should land in the f22/rawhide composes tomorrow. The koji builds will be available a bit later today. Most of the userspace issues around the major version

Re: rpmbuild of rawhide kernel fails.

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Paul Bolle pebo...@tiscali.nl wrote: On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 11:54 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: I'm trying to build a rawhide kernel (kernel-3.20.0-0.rc0.git7.1.fc23.src.rpm) with rpmbuild -bb --target x86_64 kernel.spec and I'm getting the following error +

Re: [kernel] Minor updates for ARMv7/ARM64

+- Minor updates for ARMv7/ARM64 + * Mon Feb 16 2015 Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org - 3.20.0-0.rc0.git6.1 - Linux v3.19-6676-g1fa185ebcbce ___ kernel mailing list kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo

Linux v3.20 plans

Hi All, If you've been watching rawhide the past couple of days, you've seen that the kernel has started moving to the 3.20 merge window kernels. At the moment, rawhide and the f22 branch will remain in-sync. Things have, so far, gone fairly smoothly in local testing. Feedback from others would

Re: Trouble cross compiling for powerpc

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Paul Bolle pebo...@tiscali.nl wrote: On Fri, 2015-01-30 at 08:14 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Paul Bolle pebo...@tiscali.nl wrote: I'm having trouble cross compiling on an up-to-date x64_64 F20 machine. make CROSS_COMPILE

Re: Trouble cross compiling for powerpc

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Paul Bolle pebo...@tiscali.nl wrote: I'm having trouble cross compiling on an up-to-date x64_64 F20 machine. make CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc64-linux-gnu- ARCH=powerpc drivers/dma/ppc4xx/adma.o CHK include/config/kernel.release CHK

Re: Enable Baytrail devices in kernel builds

On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com wrote: Hey, This driver, as discussed here: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.input/35190 got merged last year. It's the driver for buttons integrated in Baytrail tablets, and should make power and volume buttons

Re: [PATCH] build fix 3.18.2-200.fc21(ppc, s390, aarch64)

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Jakub Cajka jca...@redhat.com wrote: Hello, in attachment is build fix(I'm not sure if kernel spec file formatting, patch numbering... is correct). Consists of upstream commit

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >